{"id":17516,"date":"2026-02-10T08:35:33","date_gmt":"2026-02-10T07:35:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/hosting-vergleich-kritik-unbrauchbar-serveranalyse-hub\/"},"modified":"2026-02-10T08:35:33","modified_gmt":"2026-02-10T07:35:33","slug":"hosting-comparison-criticism-useless-server-analysis-hub","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/hosting-vergleich-kritik-unbrauchbar-serveranalyse-hub\/","title":{"rendered":"Hosting comparison criticism: Why many tests are technically useless"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Hosting comparison review<\/strong> shows how superficial tests produce false winners: one-off measurements without load, outdated key figures and a lack of safety tests distort results. I explain why these tests are of little technical value and how I set up reliable measurements with TTFBs, load profiles and safety checks.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Key points<\/h2>\n<p>I summarize the most important weaknesses and practical countermeasures in a compact way so that you can classify test reports more quickly. Many portals emphasize marketing information but neglect technical details. <strong>core values<\/strong>. With a few clear tests, you can recognize real performance instead of advertising promises. Pay attention to measurement quality, measurement frequency and realistic <strong>Load profiles<\/strong>. Keep a written record of your results so that you can compare tariffs accurately.<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Methodology<\/strong>: One-off checks are deceptive; continuous measurements count.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Performance<\/strong>TTFB and E2E instead of mere uptime quota.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Security<\/strong>Pentest simulation instead of feature lists.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Scaling<\/strong>Load tests with user scenarios, not just ping.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Support<\/strong>Measure response time, standardize cases.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This is how I filter out marketing noise and collect hard values. Each measurement follows a previously defined <strong>Scenario<\/strong>, each result remains reproducible. I compensate for deviations with second runs and check globally. At the end, I compare like an auditor: same basis, same load, clear <strong>Metrics<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/hostingvergleich-kritik-8472.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Why many hosting tests fail technically<\/h2>\n\n<p>Many portals install WordPress, click on a theme, and then evaluate the <strong>Speed<\/strong> using individual screenshots. Such a procedure ignores caching warm-up, network scattering and daily load. One provider works quickly because the test happened to run in a quiet minute. Another slips because backups are running in parallel in the shared cluster. I therefore measure with a time delay, repeatedly and from several <strong>Regions<\/strong>, so that outliers do not determine the judgment.<\/p>\n<p>I also make a strict distinction between \u201ecold\u201c and \u201ewarm\u201c runs: The first retrieval without a cache shows the raw <strong>Origin performance<\/strong>, other retrievals measure cache hit rates and their stability. Both perspectives are important - showing only warm values masks server latency, while showing only cold values ignores real user paths with repeat requests. I choose measurement windows over 24 hours and on at least two days of the week so as not to overlook shift operation, backups and batch jobs.<\/p>\n<p>Another mistake: identical themes, but different <strong>Configurations<\/strong>. I version my test environment (themes, plugins, PHP version, WP cache settings) and freeze it for all providers. Changes to the stack are synchronized and noted in the log. This is the only way to clearly assign regressions and improvements instead of attributing them to the wrong factor.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Missing load and scaling tests<\/h2>\n\n<p>Without a realistic load, any performance evaluation remains incomplete, as shared environments react sensitively to parallel loads. <strong>User<\/strong>. I simulate waves of visitors with increasing requests per second and observe error rates, TTFB jumps and CPU throttling. Many tests evaluate \u201efast\u201c after the first call and ignore how the platform collapses with ten times more accesses. I also check whether limits such as PHP workers, I\/O or RAM throttle early. If you know such limits, you protect yourself from expensive <strong>Failures<\/strong>. A good overview of the pitfalls of portals can be found in the article <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/hosting-comparison-portals-critical-servercheckrand\/\">Comparison portals critical<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I model load profiles as real <strong>User scenarios<\/strong>Open category page, set filter, load product details, add to shopping cart, start checkout. I measure error classes (5xx, 4xx), queue times in the backend, cache bypasses and session locks. As soon as waiting times suddenly increase, I identify the limiting component: too few PHP workers, slow database, file locks in the cache or rate limits for external services. I document the volume (e.g. 20 simultaneous users, 150 RPS) at which stability starts to deteriorate - a hard, comparable <strong>Break-even<\/strong> for every offer.<\/p>\n<p>It is also important to <strong>Resilience<\/strong>How does the system recover after a load peak? I stop the load abruptly and check whether queues flow off, caches remain consistent and whether error rates quickly fall to normal levels. A robust setup shows short recovery times and no data inconsistencies (e.g. orphaned sessions, duplicate orders). These behavior patterns often say more than a peak throughput value.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/hosting_kritik_meeting_4827.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Outdated metrics distort results<\/h2>\n\n<p>A naked uptime quota says almost nothing about <strong>Speed<\/strong> when the first byte contact is lame. I evaluate TTFB separately and aim for values under 300 ms, measured over several locations and time windows. Single shots from Frankfurt are not enough for me, as routing and peering fluctuate. I also check waterfall diagrams to isolate bottlenecks in DNS, TLS handshake or backend. This allows me to recognize whether a great front end is just a weak <strong>Backend<\/strong> concealed.<\/p>\n<p>I also make a clear distinction between <strong>synthetic<\/strong> measurements (controlled clients, defined bandwidths) and <strong>real user data<\/strong> from E2E flows. Synthetic covers regression and trend analyses, E2E shows production proximity and uncovers sporadic latency peaks. Both measurement worlds have their own dashboards and are not mixed. Server timing headers and detailed timings (DNS, TCP, TLS, TTFB, TTI) help to assign the responsibility layer: Network, web server, app, database or third party.<\/p>\n<p>I only use Core Web Vitals as a supplement. They reflect rendering and interaction, but are highly customizable. <strong>front-end heavy<\/strong>. For host comparisons, what primarily counts is the origin latency, stability under load and the ability to deliver dynamic content quickly. A score of 100 does not conceal anything if the first byte contact remains sluggish or the checkout collapses under load.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Security checks that hardly anyone checks<\/h2>\n\n<p>Many tests list free SSL certificates without analyzing the configuration. <strong>check<\/strong>. I test headers such as HSTS, check OCSP stapling and simulate XSS and SQL injection against demos. Error pages often reveal paths, versions or debug notes, which I consider a risk. I also evaluate backup options: Distance, encryption and recovery time. Only these components add up to a complete <strong>Security image<\/strong> instead of whitewashing.<\/p>\n<p>I also look at <strong>Account hardening<\/strong>2FA availability, IP restrictions for the control panel, API keys with scope limits, separate production and staging access. On the server side, I pay attention to SSH\/SFTP options, file permissions (no 777), isolated PHP pools and logging without plain text passwords. A clean default configuration already prevents many trivial attacks.<\/p>\n<p>WAF, rate limits and <strong>Brute force protection<\/strong> are only a plus if they work in a comprehensible way: clear threshold values, customizable rules, meaningful error messages without information leaks. I check whether false alarms are documented and whether support responds to security incidents in a structured manner (ticket classification, forensic data, time to mitigation). I check GDPR aspects via data locations, ADV contract, deletion concepts and retention periods for logs - security is more than just a lock symbol in the browser.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/hosting-vergleich-kritik-fake-4921.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Support assessment: How I measure fair<\/h2>\n\n<p>I never evaluate support based on my emotional state, but with identical <strong>Tickets<\/strong>. Each scenario receives the same text, the same logs and a clear expectation. I stop the response time until the first qualified answer and evaluate the technical depth. General phrases without a solution cost points, reliable steps including reference numbers earn points. If you offer live chat, you need to offer a similar service at peak times. <strong>fast<\/strong> deliver as at night.<\/p>\n<p>I also evaluate <strong>Continuity<\/strong>Are tickets handed over cleanly or do they \u201ereset\u201c at shift changes? Are there summaries, checklists, clear queries? I rate positively when support teams proactively explain causes, name workarounds and suggest retests - not just report \u201eticket closed\u201c. I also record availability via channels (chat, phone, email), SLAs and the availability of escalation paths for critical incidents.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Correct test methodology at a glance<\/h2>\n\n<p>To ensure that results remain reliable, I set up anonymous test accounts, install WordPress without demo ballast and launch automated <strong>Measurement series<\/strong>. GTmetrix, continuous TTFB checks and simple E2E flows cover the day-to-day business. Global calls show whether a CDN is sitting correctly or just hiding latency. After updates, I repeat core runs to find regressions. If you want to deepen measurement quality, take a look at the <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/pagespeed-scores-hosting-comparison-serverboost\/\">PageSpeed scores<\/a> as a supplement to the TTFB; they do not replace load tests, but complete the picture.<\/p>\n<p>I use an identical one for all providers <strong>Baseline<\/strong>Same PHP version, same WP configuration, identical themes and plugins, same caching settings. I document changes with a timestamp, commit hash and brief justification. Measuring points (locations, bandwidth profiles) remain consistent. I record results in a standardized template: test window, median\/95th percentile, error rate, anomalies and notes. I mark outliers visibly and check them with a second run.<\/p>\n<p>I minimize confusion factors by <strong>Decoupling<\/strong>Keep DNS providers constant, identical TTLs, no traffic shaping in the browser, identical headers (Accept-Encoding, Cache-Control), no parallel deployments during the runs. This makes it clear whether differences originate from the hoster or from the test environment.<\/p>\n\n<table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th>Criterion<\/th>\n      <th>Frequent test error<\/th>\n      <th>Correct method<\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td><strong>Performance<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>One-time ping without context<\/td>\n      <td>Weekly GTmetrix runs plus TTFB &lt; 300 ms<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td><strong>Security<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>Feature lists instead of testing<\/td>\n      <td>XSS\/SQLi simulation and header analysis<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td><strong>Support<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>Subjective mail judgments<\/td>\n      <td>Standardized ticket time measurement<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td><strong>Scalability<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>No load profiles<\/td>\n      <td>E2E with user simulation and error rate<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/hostingvergleich_buero_9821.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Recognize price traps and bait offers<\/h2>\n\n<p>Many tariffs shine with entry-level discounts, but conceal expensive <strong>Extensions<\/strong>. I always calculate total costs per year including SSL, backups, domains and any add-ons required. A \u201efree\u201c backup doesn't help if restore fees are incurred. I also cover contract periods; long commitments often hide later price jumps. If you calculate properly, you can compare effectively and protect your <strong>Budget<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The full costs also include <strong>Soft limits<\/strong>Email sending quotas, I\/O throttling, CPU minutes, inodes, API limits. Exceeding these limits leads to throttled performance or additional costs - both must be included in the evaluation. I check whether upgrades are fairly priced and whether downgrades are possible without risking new fees or data loss. Hidden fees (setup, migration, restore per case, additional IPs) are added to a separate cost line and included in the annual assessment.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Technology stack: interpreting NVMe, PHP and CDN correctly<\/h2>\n\n<p>I check whether the provider has genuine <strong>NVMe<\/strong>-SSDs, how many PHP workers are running and whether HTTP\/2 or HTTP\/3 is active. NVMe brings low latencies, but is of little help if I\/O is limited or caching is configured incorrectly. A CDN reduces global latency, but must not conceal the server weakness in Origin. I therefore separate static and dynamic tests and measure both paths separately. This allows me to see where optimization is effective and where hard <strong>Boundaries<\/strong> lie.<\/p>\n<p>I go into depth with <strong>Server tuning<\/strong>OPcache hit rates, JIT effects, Brotli\/Gzip, TLS 1.3, ALPN, IPv6, HTTP keep-alive and connection reuse. On the database side, I check the engine (InnoDB), buffer pool sizes, slow query logs and connection limits. Virtualization (KVM, LXC) and container isolation are relevant when it comes to \u201enoisy neighbors\u201c. A strong marketing label is of little use if the isolation is weak and neighbors eat up the resources.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/hostingkritikdesk4721.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Ranking example without embellishment<\/h2>\n\n<p>I show a sample ranking that provides clear <strong>Criteria<\/strong> and hides marketing screens. The rating is based on TTFB, stability under load, security configuration and support response time. Prices take into account additional costs such as SSL and backups. Technology is rated first, convenience second. This creates a picture that reflects real <strong>Performance<\/strong> rewarded.<\/p>\n\n<table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th>Place<\/th>\n      <th>Provider<\/th>\n      <th>Strengths<\/th>\n      <th>Weaknesses<\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td><strong>1<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>webhoster.de<\/td>\n      <td>NVMe, fast support, GDPR<\/td>\n      <td>None<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td><strong>2<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>1blu<\/td>\n      <td>Good speed values<\/td>\n      <td>Slower reactions<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td><strong>3<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>webgo<\/td>\n      <td>High uptime<\/td>\n      <td>Older interface<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n<h2>How to test yourself - in 60 minutes<\/h2>\n\n<p>Start with a fresh WordPress instance without Pagebuilder and without demo import so that the <strong>Base<\/strong> remains clean. Create three identical subpages and measure TTFB from two regions, three times each, so that outliers do not dominate. Perform a simple load run with increasing requests and observe error rates from five parallel users. Check the security header, TLS version and the restoration of a backup. Afterwards, read your measurement logs crosswise and correct obvious errors. <strong>Error<\/strong> with a second run; why measurements often go wrong is shown in the article on <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/speed-tests-incorrect-results-measurement-errors-server-boost\/\">incorrect speed tests<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>If there is time: Test emails (SPF, DKIM, DMARC configured?), DNS lookup times (authoritative name server, TTL strategy) and the upload of larger files. This will help you recognize throttling that is not mentioned in brochures. Document each step briefly - just a few key points per test run increase the <strong>Traceability<\/strong> enormous.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/hostingvergleich-testkritik-9471.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Practical evaluation: from figures to decisions<\/h2>\n\n<p>I give more weight to TTFB and stability than comfort functions because reliable <strong>Performance<\/strong> protects sales. Uptime below 99.99% lowers the score noticeably, especially if outages become more frequent. Fast support is a lifesaver in an emergency, but should not compensate for weak technology. In the end, I add up the costs in an annual analysis, including add-ons. In this way, I make a choice that saves stress and creates real value. <strong>Transparency<\/strong> supplies.<\/p>\n<p>For the evaluation, I work with clear <strong>Weights<\/strong>e.g. performance 40%, stability under load 25%, security 20%, support 10%, cost clarity 5%. Each criterion has measurable thresholds (TTFB &lt; 300 ms, 95th percentile &lt; 500 ms, 0% 5xx under moderate load, recovery &lt; 60 s after load peak, complete header protection, restore &lt; 15 min). This results in a score that is not based on gut feeling, but on real signals. If the results are close, I decide on <strong>Robustness<\/strong> (percentile, recovery time) instead of peak values.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Transparency, conflicts of interest and ethics<\/h2>\n<p>I document whether a provider provides test access, whether affiliate relationships exist and whether support teams know about the test. <strong>Transparency<\/strong> prevents skewed perceptions. Tests run on my accounts, not on third-party production sites. Load tests are deliberately limited so that no third-party systems are affected. I publish results with methodology, date and version status - this is the only way they can be <strong>replicable<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Recognizing noisy neighbors and insulation quality<\/h2>\n<p>Shared hosting stands and falls with <strong>Insulation<\/strong>. I check hourly TTFB drifts over several days: regular sawtooth patterns indicate backup\/cron windows, irregular peaks indicate neighboring loads. I also measure under my own constant load: If the latency increases without any action on my part, this indicates external influences. Providers with stable isolation deliver tightly clustered percentiles, even at peak times.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Staging, deployments and recoveries<\/h2>\n<p>Good hosting support is evident in the <strong>Life cycle<\/strong> of a site: Create staging, mask data, deploy back to production, restore backup, test rollback. I assess whether these steps are documented, transactionally secure and possible without long downtimes. RPO\/RTO key figures are just as much a part of the assessment as uptime - because data loss is more serious than a short outage.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Specific tips for your next comparison<\/h2>\n\n<p>Before buying, place three hard <strong>Goals<\/strong> fixed: TTFB under 300 ms, 99.99% availability and support responses within five minutes in live chat. Order the smallest package as a test only and cancel immediately if the core values are not met. Repeat measurements on two days, during the day and in the evening. Actively ask for pentest reports or at least header checks. If you apply these steps consistently, you won't need glossy lists and won't get caught up in pretty <strong>Advertising promise<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Add to your checklist:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>DNS<\/strong>Authoritative response times, simple records, meaningful TTLs.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>E-mail<\/strong>SPF\/DKIM\/DMARC available, reputation, limitation of outgoing mails.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Resources<\/strong>PHP worker, I\/O, CPU minutes, inodes - ask for written limits.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>SLA<\/strong>Definitions of failures, credit mechanics, measurement methods of the provider.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Migration<\/strong>Costs, downtime window, who does what, test restore in advance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h2>Conclusion: Real performance instead of brochure values<\/h2>\n<p>Anyone who seriously compares hosting needs <strong>Consistency<\/strong>, not click rates. Repeated, cross-location measurements, clear load scenarios, clean security checks and standardized support tests expose quick fixes. I separate marketing from measured values, keep meticulous records and compensate for outliers with second runs. The result is a comparison that is easy on the budget, avoids failures and gives you the certainty that you have chosen the right platform - based on hard figures, not nice promises.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hosting comparison review: Why many comparisons are technically useless - webhosting test error and hosting review analyzed.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17509,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_crdt_document":"","inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[685],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17516","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-allgemein"],"acf":[],"_wp_attached_file":null,"_wp_attachment_metadata":null,"litespeed-optimize-size":null,"litespeed-optimize-set":null,"_elementor_source_image_hash":null,"_wp_attachment_image_alt":null,"stockpack_author_name":null,"stockpack_author_url":null,"stockpack_provider":null,"stockpack_image_url":null,"stockpack_license":null,"stockpack_license_url":null,"stockpack_modification":null,"color":null,"original_id":null,"original_url":null,"original_link":null,"unsplash_location":null,"unsplash_sponsor":null,"unsplash_exif":null,"unsplash_attachment_metadata":null,"_elementor_is_screenshot":null,"surfer_file_name":null,"surfer_file_original_url":null,"envato_tk_source_kit":null,"envato_tk_source_index":null,"envato_tk_manifest":null,"envato_tk_folder_name":null,"envato_tk_builder":null,"envato_elements_download_event":null,"_menu_item_type":null,"_menu_item_menu_item_parent":null,"_menu_item_object_id":null,"_menu_item_object":null,"_menu_item_target":null,"_menu_item_classes":null,"_menu_item_xfn":null,"_menu_item_url":null,"_trp_menu_languages":null,"rank_math_primary_category":null,"rank_math_title":null,"inline_featured_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":null,"rank_math_schema_blogposting":null,"rank_math_schema_videoobject":null,"_oembed_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_oembed_time_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":null,"_yoast_wpseo_linkdex":null,"_oembed_27e3473bf8bec795fbeb3a9d38489348":null,"_oembed_c3b0f6959478faf92a1f343d8f96b19e":null,"_trp_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_desired_post_slug":null,"_yoast_wpseo_title":null,"tldname":null,"tldpreis":null,"tldrubrik":null,"tldpolicylink":null,"tldsize":null,"tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"tldtransfer":null,"tldwhoisprivacy":null,"tldregistrarchange":null,"tldregistrantchange":null,"tldwhoisupdate":null,"tldnameserverupdate":null,"tlddeletesofort":null,"tlddeleteexpire":null,"tldumlaute":null,"tldrestore":null,"tldsubcategory":null,"tldbildname":null,"tldbildurl":null,"tldclean":null,"tldcategory":null,"tldpolicy":null,"tldbesonderheiten":null,"tld_bedeutung":null,"_oembed_d167040d816d8f94c072940c8009f5f8":null,"_oembed_b0a0fa59ef14f8870da2c63f2027d064":null,"_oembed_4792fa4dfb2a8f09ab950a73b7f313ba":null,"_oembed_33ceb1fe54a8ab775d9410abf699878d":null,"_oembed_fd7014d14d919b45ec004937c0db9335":null,"_oembed_21a029d076783ec3e8042698c351bd7e":null,"_oembed_be5ea8a0c7b18e658f08cc571a909452":null,"_oembed_a9ca7a298b19f9b48ec5914e010294d2":null,"_oembed_f8db6b27d08a2bb1f920e7647808899a":null,"_oembed_168ebde5096e77d8a89326519af9e022":null,"_oembed_cdb76f1b345b42743edfe25481b6f98f":null,"_oembed_87b0613611ae54e86e8864265404b0a1":null,"_oembed_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_oembed_time_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_tldname":null,"_tldclean":null,"_tldpreis":null,"_tldcategory":null,"_tldsubcategory":null,"_tldpolicy":null,"_tldpolicylink":null,"_tldsize":null,"_tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"_tldtransfer":null,"_tldwhoisprivacy":null,"_tldregistrarchange":null,"_tldregistrantchange":null,"_tldwhoisupdate":null,"_tldnameserverupdate":null,"_tlddeletesofort":null,"_tlddeleteexpire":null,"_tldumlaute":null,"_tldrestore":null,"_tldbildname":null,"_tldbildurl":null,"_tld_bedeutung":null,"_tldbesonderheiten":null,"_oembed_ad96e4112edb9f8ffa35731d4098bc6b":null,"_oembed_8357e2b8a2575c74ed5978f262a10126":null,"_oembed_3d5fea5103dd0d22ec5d6a33eff7f863":null,"_eael_widget_elements":null,"_oembed_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_oembed_time_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_aioseo_description":null,"_eb_attr":null,"_eb_data_table":null,"_oembed_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_oembed_time_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_acf_changed":null,"_wpcode_auto_insert":null,"_edit_last":null,"_edit_lock":null,"_oembed_e7b913c6c84084ed9702cb4feb012ddd":null,"_oembed_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_time_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"_oembed_time_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"rank_math_news_sitemap_robots":null,"rank_math_robots":null,"_eael_post_view_count":"974","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ru_ru":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_et":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lv":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fr_fr":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_old_slug":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_da_dk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pl_pl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_es_es":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_hu_hu":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fi":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ja":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lt_lt":null,"_elementor_edit_mode":null,"_elementor_template_type":null,"_elementor_version":null,"_elementor_pro_version":null,"_wp_page_template":null,"_elementor_page_settings":null,"_elementor_data":null,"_elementor_css":null,"_elementor_conditions":null,"_happyaddons_elements_cache":null,"_oembed_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_time_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_time_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_time_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_time_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_oembed_time_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_elementor_screenshot":null,"_oembed_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_oembed_time_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_elementor_controls_usage":null,"_elementor_page_assets":[],"_elementor_screenshot_failed":null,"theplus_transient_widgets":null,"_eael_custom_js":null,"_wp_old_date":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_it_it":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_pt":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_zh_cn":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_nl_nl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_br":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sv_se":null,"rank_math_analytic_object_id":null,"rank_math_internal_links_processed":"1","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ro_ro":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sk_sk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_bg_bg":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sl_si":null,"litespeed_vpi_list":null,"litespeed_vpi_list_mobile":null,"rank_math_seo_score":null,"rank_math_contentai_score":null,"ilj_limitincominglinks":null,"ilj_maxincominglinks":null,"ilj_limitoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_maxoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_limitlinksperparagraph":null,"ilj_linksperparagraph":null,"ilj_blacklistdefinition":null,"ilj_linkdefinition":null,"_eb_reusable_block_ids":null,"rank_math_focus_keyword":"Hosting Vergleich Kritik","rank_math_og_content_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_content_score":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskeywords":null,"_yoast_wpseo_keywordsynonyms":null,"_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":null,"rank_math_description":null,"surfer_last_post_update":null,"surfer_last_post_update_direction":null,"surfer_keywords":null,"surfer_location":null,"surfer_draft_id":null,"surfer_permalink_hash":null,"surfer_scrape_ready":null,"_thumbnail_id":"17509","footnotes":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17516","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17516"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17516\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}