{"id":18705,"date":"2026-04-04T11:49:02","date_gmt":"2026-04-04T09:49:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/multi-tenant-architektur-saas-hosting-cloud-integration-mandanten\/"},"modified":"2026-04-04T11:49:02","modified_gmt":"2026-04-04T09:49:02","slug":"multi-tenant-architecture-saas-hosting-cloud-integration-clients","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/multi-tenant-architektur-saas-hosting-cloud-integration-mandanten\/","title":{"rendered":"Multi-tenant architecture: the basis of modern SaaS hosting solutions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The multi-tenant architecture forms the basis with which I provide SaaS applications in a multi-tenant, cost-efficient and secure manner on a common platform. I clearly explain how tenant isolation, scaling and operational processes interact so that <strong>SaaS<\/strong>-teams deliver quickly and companies grow in a controlled manner.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Key points<\/h2>\n\n<p>I focus on the economic impact, technical implementation and practicable decisions for product teams and IT managers. The following key points will give you a straightforward overview of what really matters. I keep the language clear and the concepts tangible so you can make decisions with impact. The list summarizes the essence, while the following sections provide the details. So you can get started quickly with well-founded <strong>Insights<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Cost sharing<\/strong>Shared resources drastically reduce unit costs per customer.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Insulation<\/strong>Strict separation of data per tenant with clear boundaries.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Scaling<\/strong>Horizontal expansion without new app instances per customer.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Automation<\/strong>Central updates, CI\/CD and monitoring for all tenants.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Freedom of choice<\/strong>Multi- or single-tenant depending on governance and control requirements.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p>I focus on measures that reduce costs, contain risks and accelerate releases. The following chapters show how you can realize these benefits with <strong>System<\/strong> planning and implementation.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/moderner-serverraum-0283.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>What multi-tenancy means in practice<\/h2>\n\n<p>With multi-tenancy, many customers share a software instance, database cluster and hardware, while each organization acts as its own <strong>Client<\/strong> remains logically separate. This model is similar to an apartment building: shared utilities, separate apartments. I separate data via tenant IDs, policies and end-to-end authentication so that access is clearly demarcated. Access is usually via the cloud, with secure connections and consistent interfaces. In this way, one instance provides many separate <strong>Workspaces<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p>If you want to delve deeper, first clarify the basic <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/web-hosting-jargon-bare-metal-hypervisor-multi-tenant-guide\/\">Hosting terms<\/a> and understands how virtualization, containers and database layout interact. When planning, I take into account the data domains, the number of users and the expected load. From this, I derive the appropriate isolation level for the database and compute. I define the tenant boundary technically via IDs, namespaces, policies and service accounts. This allows me to keep the separation consistent across all <strong>Levels<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Tenant life cycle and onboarding<\/h2>\n\n<p>I think of clients holistically from the first contact to decommissioning. Onboarding starts with provisioning (tenant ID, default roles, limits), sets up domains\/subdomains, branding and SSO (SAML\/OIDC) and defines data residency preferences. I store start configurations as code and seed sample data so that teams are immediately productive. A clear invitation and role workflow (owner, admin, editor, viewer) minimizes support. I automatically convert trials into paid plans: billing activated, limits adjusted, audit log continued. I treat changes to the client - renaming, domain change, plan change, user imports - as separate, traceable processes with rollback. Offboarding deletes or anonymizes data after defined retention periods; I provide self-service exports. This keeps the life cycle consistent, verifiable and efficient.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Economic effects and billing<\/h2>\n\n<p>Multi-tenancy distributes infrastructure, licenses and operating costs across many customers, which greatly reduces the unit costs per tenant. I calculate OPEX instead of high CAPEX, reduce overprovisioning and use utilization curves more intelligently. Providers pass on these advantages via monthly or annual prices, often based on the number of users, function packages or data volumes in <strong>Euro<\/strong>. An example calculation makes it tangible: If 1,000 customers share a high-availability cluster for \u20ac18,000 per month, the pure infrastructure costs are \u20ac18 per customer, plus service and support. This model enables growth without the constant purchase of isolated <strong>Server<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p>I don't only see savings with a large number of customers, but already from a medium number of users. Joint upgrades, monitoring and backups save further costs. At the same time, I keep options open if individual customers want additional isolation. Later on, you can add dedicated databases or isolated nodes for sensitive tenants and measure costs transparently. This keeps the bill predictable and the <strong>Scaling<\/strong> predictable.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/MultiTenantArchitektur5443.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Multi-tenant vs. single-tenant in comparison<\/h2>\n\n<p>I compare both architectures in terms of costs, control, security, scaling and time-to-market. Single-tenant offers maximum independence, but drives up costs and operating expenses. Multi-tenant accelerates rollouts and reduces the price per customer. For structured decisions, I refer you to a short <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/single-tenant-vs-multi-tenant-hosting-comparison-cloud-optimized\/\">Comparison of hosting models<\/a>. The following table summarizes the most important <strong>Differences<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th>Criterion<\/th>\n      <th>Multi-tenant<\/th>\n      <th>Single-tenant<\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Costs<\/td>\n      <td>Divided, low unit costs<\/td>\n      <td>Dedicated, higher fixed costs<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Control<\/td>\n      <td>Standardized configuration<\/td>\n      <td>Maximum customizability<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Scaling<\/td>\n      <td>Elastic, horizontal load distribution<\/td>\n      <td>Scaled separately per customer<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Updates<\/td>\n      <td>Central, synchronized for all<\/td>\n      <td>Separate for each instance<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Security responsibility<\/td>\n      <td>Centrally managed<\/td>\n      <td>With the customer team<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n<p>I rely on multi-tenant when costs, speed and operation are prioritized. I consider single-tenant when regulatory requirements demand dedicated systems. Hybrid variants combine both approaches: shared app layers, dedicated databases for sensitive <strong>Tenants<\/strong>. This leaves room for governance and budget. The decisive factor is a clear decision-making framework with resilient <strong>Criteria<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Isolation and safety in practice<\/h2>\n\n<p>I separate clients technically by means of controls: Authentication, authorization, service and database policies. In relational models, I use row-level security with Tenant ID. In document-oriented stores, I embed the Tenant ID in collections and queries. I use at-rest and in-transit encryption throughout. In this way I maintain strict <strong>Insulation<\/strong> from the front end to data management.<\/p>\n\n<p>I log sensitive actions on a client-specific basis and secure audit trails. I assign rights via roles and finely granulated authorizations per feature. I set just-in-time approvals and short validity periods for admin access. I focus security tests and penetration tests on client boundaries to rule out cross-access. This discipline reduces risks and creates resilient <strong>Trust<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/multi-tenant-architektur-saas-6347.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Performance Isolation and Noisy Neighbor<\/h2>\n\n<p>I make sure that individual clients do not impair the performance of others. To do this, I set quotas and rate limits per tenant, define fair scheduler rules for asynchronous jobs and limit simultaneous requests. In Kubernetes, I separate resources with requests\/limits, ResourceQuotas and PriorityClasses. On the database side, I work with connection pools per tenant, query governance (time-outs, statement limits) and hot partition analyses. A cell-based design (several identical cells with their own data storage and compute) reduces blast radius and improves predictability. I identify \u201cnoisy\u201d tenants via heat maps and, if necessary, consider dedicated resources or reallocation to a new cell - automatically and without downtime. In this way, I keep latencies stable and the user experience consistent.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Data models, silo, pool and bridge<\/h2>\n\n<p>I choose between three common patterns: silo (separate database per tenant), pool (shared database with tenant ID) and bridge (hybrid form). Silo facilitates legal separations, but increases costs and maintenance. Pool maximizes resource sharing, but requires strict policies. Bridge combines both and is suitable for differentiated <strong>Clients<\/strong>. Sharding distributes load horizontally and increases throughput as the number of users grows.<\/p>\n\n<p>For the start, I often opt for pool with row-level security because it offers fast iteration and clear costs. Later, I add silo elements for tenants with special requirements. This keeps the platform economical and expandable at the same time. A migration path is important: from shared to dedicated data storage without downtime. I plan these steps early on and document all <strong>Boundaries<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Kubernetes, containers and automation<\/h2>\n\n<p>Containers bundle app, dependencies and runtime into reproducible units. Kubernetes orchestrates these units via namespaces, deployments and services. Multitenancy can be structured cleanly via namespaces, network policies and secrets. Horizontal Pod Autoscaler reacts to load peaks, while PodDisruptionBudgets ensure availability. This is how I achieve predictable <strong>Operating procedures<\/strong> with high efficiency.<\/p>\n\n<p>I use declarative configuration and Git workflows as the operating standard. CI\/CD pipelines build, test and distribute artifacts in stages. Canary or Blue\/Green reduce failure risks for new releases. Monitoring via metrics, logs and traces creates visibility per tenant. These building blocks make multi-tenancy manageable and keep <strong>Downtime<\/strong> low.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/moderne_saas_architektur_4921.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Updates, releases and CI\/CD<\/h2>\n\n<p>A key advantage of multi-tenant lies in standardized rollouts. I update a code base and deliver functions to all customers at the same time. I correct errors in one place and minimize divergences. Feature flags control visibility per tenant without having to maintain separate branches for each customer. This reduces effort and increases <strong>Quality<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p>I measure success by turnaround time, recovery time and change rate. Automated tests run at API, integration and end-to-end level. I keep rollbacks simple, for example via images and migration scripts with backward compatibility. I define maintenance windows clearly and announce them early on. The result: short cycles, low risks, satisfied customers. <strong>Teams<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Multi-client capable configuration and expandability<\/h2>\n\n<p>I separate product functions from configuration. Tenants activate features, set limits and control integrations. A central config backend with caching ensures fast evaluation at runtime. I plan extensions as add-ons with clear dependencies. This keeps the core app lean, while tenants provide differentiated <strong>Packages<\/strong> use.<\/p>\n\n<p>If you integrate external services, I isolate access data for each tenant. Webhooks, event bus and idempotency protect against double processing. Quotas prevent misuse and ensure fair load distribution. I offer asynchronous reporting and export so that interactive work remains fluid. This allows you to maintain speed, security and <strong>Clarity<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/SaaS_Architektur_Desk4321.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Data residency and compliance<\/h2>\n\n<p>I take legal requirements into account right from the start. Data classification separates personal, confidential and publicly accessible information. I offer data residency per tenant (e.g. EU\/non-EU) and record this decision in the client configuration. I define retention periods, deletion concepts and export functions as repeatable processes. Role-based access, audit-proof audit logs and traceable configurations facilitate certifications and audits. I implement key management with strict separation per tenant (envelope encryption, rotating keys) so that even internal admins only have access via controlled paths. I treat changes to policies like code: versioned, tested, rolled out. This allows me to meet compliance requirements without losing product speed.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Backup, restore and disaster recovery<\/h2>\n\n<p>I plan backups with clients in mind. In addition to complete snapshots, I rely on logically separate backups per tenant to enable targeted restores - for example in the event of accidental deletions. I formulate RPO\/RTO clearly and test them regularly in restore exercises. For highly regulated tenants, I activate additional copies and extended retention. Replication via zones\/regions and automated failover processes limit outages; I include asynchronous components (queues, batch jobs) in restart scenarios. I encrypt backups separately, keep access to a minimum and document retrievals in an audit-proof manner. So recovery is not theory, but practiced practice.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Scaling, monitoring and cost control<\/h2>\n\n<p>I start scaling measurably: I set SLOs, define bottlenecks and eliminate hotspots. Caches reduce latency, queues smooth the load and asynchronous jobs protect front-end response times. I optimize costs with right-sizing, reserved capacity and storage criteria per data type. A heatmap dashboard shows me clients with high loads and outliers. This allows me to manage growth and keep the <strong>Margin<\/strong> stable.<\/p>\n\n<p>I link cost centers with tenants to enable fair billing. I create measurement points early on instead of making expensive upgrades later. Alerts are based on user experience, not just technology metrics. Capacity planning takes place on a rolling basis, linked to the product roadmap and sales. This keeps the platform performant and <strong>plannable<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Test strategy and quality assurance<\/h2>\n\n<p>I test Tenant Isolation specifically. Unit and integration tests check that every query necessarily uses a tenant ID and that RLS\/policies work correctly. Negative tests ensure that data from other tenants is never visible. For end-to-end scenarios, I use synthetic tenants with realistic data volumes to verify performance and limits. I accompany data migrations with expand\/migrate\/contract patterns and backwards compatibility of the APIs. Contract tests with integrations per plan\/feature prevent surprises after releases. I keep test data deterministic and versioned so that builds remain reproducible. In this way, quality grows in parallel with functionality.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Operational processes and support<\/h2>\n\n<p>I equip support teams with secure tools: Client changes are made via authorized impersonation with approval, time-limited and fully logged. \u201cBreak-glass\u201d accesses are just-in-time, subject to approval and linked to tickets. Runbooks describe standard cases (password reset, domain change, restore, plan upgrade) step by step; metrics evaluate their effectiveness. Status pages and in-app communication provide tenant-specific information about maintenance or incidents. I design differentiated SLAs for each plan - including escalation paths and response times. This keeps operations transparent, secure and customer-oriented.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/hosting-architektur-9861.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Common misconceptions and best practices<\/h2>\n\n<p>A common misconception: multi-tenant weakens safety. In reality, security depends on clean isolation, testing and operational culture. If you want to dispel myths, take a look at client-specific hardening measures, such as <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/shared-hosting-security-tenant-isolation-serverguard\/\">Tenant insulation<\/a> at infrastructure level. A second misconception: multi-tenant prevents individual requirements. Feature flags, add-ons and dedicated resources prove the opposite in clear terms. <strong>Steps<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p>I recommend a capability-focused approach: standardized core, configurable interfaces, clear release paths. Documentation, onboarding and self-service reduce the support burden and increase satisfaction. I set security-relevant defaults strictly and comprehensibly. I anchor observability as a product feature, not as an afterthought. This keeps the platform secure, fast and <strong>economic<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Migrations and evolvability<\/h2>\n\n<p>I plan evolution without friction. When switching from single to multi-tenant, I first extract the tenant boundary (IDs, policies) in code and database, then I merge or reshard data step by step. For tenant moves between shards\/cells, I use dual writes, replication and verified cutover windows - with clear checks before and after the switch. I roll out schema changes with Expand\/Migrate\/Contract: Add fields, migrate data, rebuild legacy paths. Entitlement changes (features\/plans) run transactionally so that limits and visibility remain consistent. Versioned exports and imports allow targeted extraction of individual tenants if dedicated environments become necessary. In this way, the platform remains adaptable without sacrificing stability.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Decision guidelines by company phase<\/h2>\n\n<p>In the early phase, reach counts with a tight budget: I start multi-tenant with shared databases and clear security rules. That way, I learn quickly and keep costs low. As the customer base grows, I look into dedicated databases for sensitive tenants. In regulated scenarios, I add additional isolation levels through to dedicated databases. <strong>Node<\/strong>. The guideline remains: start small, measure, expand in a targeted manner.<\/p>\n\n<p>Sales and technology decide together: Which segments require extra insulation, which benefit most from cost sharing? Contract design and SLAs reflect these options. This clarity creates trust and avoids having to rebuild later on. I document decisions in a comprehensible manner and keep the migration path up to date. This keeps the roadmap flexible and <strong>resilient<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Final classification<\/h2>\n\n<p>Multi-tenant architecture delivers speed, cost efficiency and clear operational processes for modern SaaS offerings. With solid isolation, a clean data model and automation, I scale in a controlled manner. Standardized upgrades and feature flags bring new functionality without additional load per customer. Hybrid variants reliably cover special governance requirements. A structured approach is a winner <strong>Scaling<\/strong> without loss of control.<\/p>\n\n<p>I rely on a simple principle: a common platform, clear boundaries, measurable goals. This means that every team - from product to operations - benefits from repeatable processes. Customers experience consistent quality, short release cycles and transparent prices. This is precisely the strength of modern, multi-tenant SaaS solutions. Start today, secure tomorrow <strong>Head start<\/strong>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Learn all about multi-tenant architecture and modern SaaS hosting solutions. Understand the differences to single-tenant systems, benefit from cost efficiency and optimal client isolation.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":18698,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_crdt_document":"","inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[681],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18705","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cloud_computing"],"acf":[],"_wp_attached_file":null,"_wp_attachment_metadata":null,"litespeed-optimize-size":null,"litespeed-optimize-set":null,"_elementor_source_image_hash":null,"_wp_attachment_image_alt":null,"stockpack_author_name":null,"stockpack_author_url":null,"stockpack_provider":null,"stockpack_image_url":null,"stockpack_license":null,"stockpack_license_url":null,"stockpack_modification":null,"color":null,"original_id":null,"original_url":null,"original_link":null,"unsplash_location":null,"unsplash_sponsor":null,"unsplash_exif":null,"unsplash_attachment_metadata":null,"_elementor_is_screenshot":null,"surfer_file_name":null,"surfer_file_original_url":null,"envato_tk_source_kit":null,"envato_tk_source_index":null,"envato_tk_manifest":null,"envato_tk_folder_name":null,"envato_tk_builder":null,"envato_elements_download_event":null,"_menu_item_type":null,"_menu_item_menu_item_parent":null,"_menu_item_object_id":null,"_menu_item_object":null,"_menu_item_target":null,"_menu_item_classes":null,"_menu_item_xfn":null,"_menu_item_url":null,"_trp_menu_languages":null,"rank_math_primary_category":null,"rank_math_title":null,"inline_featured_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":null,"rank_math_schema_blogposting":null,"rank_math_schema_videoobject":null,"_oembed_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_oembed_time_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":null,"_yoast_wpseo_linkdex":null,"_oembed_27e3473bf8bec795fbeb3a9d38489348":null,"_oembed_c3b0f6959478faf92a1f343d8f96b19e":null,"_trp_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_desired_post_slug":null,"_yoast_wpseo_title":null,"tldname":null,"tldpreis":null,"tldrubrik":null,"tldpolicylink":null,"tldsize":null,"tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"tldtransfer":null,"tldwhoisprivacy":null,"tldregistrarchange":null,"tldregistrantchange":null,"tldwhoisupdate":null,"tldnameserverupdate":null,"tlddeletesofort":null,"tlddeleteexpire":null,"tldumlaute":null,"tldrestore":null,"tldsubcategory":null,"tldbildname":null,"tldbildurl":null,"tldclean":null,"tldcategory":null,"tldpolicy":null,"tldbesonderheiten":null,"tld_bedeutung":null,"_oembed_d167040d816d8f94c072940c8009f5f8":null,"_oembed_b0a0fa59ef14f8870da2c63f2027d064":null,"_oembed_4792fa4dfb2a8f09ab950a73b7f313ba":null,"_oembed_33ceb1fe54a8ab775d9410abf699878d":null,"_oembed_fd7014d14d919b45ec004937c0db9335":null,"_oembed_21a029d076783ec3e8042698c351bd7e":null,"_oembed_be5ea8a0c7b18e658f08cc571a909452":null,"_oembed_a9ca7a298b19f9b48ec5914e010294d2":null,"_oembed_f8db6b27d08a2bb1f920e7647808899a":null,"_oembed_168ebde5096e77d8a89326519af9e022":null,"_oembed_cdb76f1b345b42743edfe25481b6f98f":null,"_oembed_87b0613611ae54e86e8864265404b0a1":null,"_oembed_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_oembed_time_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_tldname":null,"_tldclean":null,"_tldpreis":null,"_tldcategory":null,"_tldsubcategory":null,"_tldpolicy":null,"_tldpolicylink":null,"_tldsize":null,"_tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"_tldtransfer":null,"_tldwhoisprivacy":null,"_tldregistrarchange":null,"_tldregistrantchange":null,"_tldwhoisupdate":null,"_tldnameserverupdate":null,"_tlddeletesofort":null,"_tlddeleteexpire":null,"_tldumlaute":null,"_tldrestore":null,"_tldbildname":null,"_tldbildurl":null,"_tld_bedeutung":null,"_tldbesonderheiten":null,"_oembed_ad96e4112edb9f8ffa35731d4098bc6b":null,"_oembed_8357e2b8a2575c74ed5978f262a10126":null,"_oembed_3d5fea5103dd0d22ec5d6a33eff7f863":null,"_eael_widget_elements":null,"_oembed_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_oembed_time_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_aioseo_description":null,"_eb_attr":null,"_eb_data_table":null,"_oembed_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_oembed_time_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_acf_changed":null,"_wpcode_auto_insert":null,"_edit_last":null,"_edit_lock":null,"_oembed_e7b913c6c84084ed9702cb4feb012ddd":null,"_oembed_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_time_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"_oembed_time_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"rank_math_news_sitemap_robots":null,"rank_math_robots":null,"_eael_post_view_count":"475","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ru_ru":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_et":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lv":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fr_fr":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_old_slug":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_da_dk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pl_pl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_es_es":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_hu_hu":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fi":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ja":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lt_lt":null,"_elementor_edit_mode":null,"_elementor_template_type":null,"_elementor_version":null,"_elementor_pro_version":null,"_wp_page_template":null,"_elementor_page_settings":null,"_elementor_data":null,"_elementor_css":null,"_elementor_conditions":null,"_happyaddons_elements_cache":null,"_oembed_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_time_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_time_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_time_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_time_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_oembed_time_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_elementor_screenshot":null,"_oembed_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_oembed_time_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_elementor_controls_usage":null,"_elementor_page_assets":[],"_elementor_screenshot_failed":null,"theplus_transient_widgets":null,"_eael_custom_js":null,"_wp_old_date":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_it_it":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_pt":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_zh_cn":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_nl_nl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_br":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sv_se":null,"rank_math_analytic_object_id":null,"rank_math_internal_links_processed":"1","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ro_ro":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sk_sk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_bg_bg":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sl_si":null,"litespeed_vpi_list":null,"litespeed_vpi_list_mobile":null,"rank_math_seo_score":null,"rank_math_contentai_score":null,"ilj_limitincominglinks":null,"ilj_maxincominglinks":null,"ilj_limitoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_maxoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_limitlinksperparagraph":null,"ilj_linksperparagraph":null,"ilj_blacklistdefinition":null,"ilj_linkdefinition":null,"_eb_reusable_block_ids":null,"rank_math_focus_keyword":"Multi-Tenant Architektur","rank_math_og_content_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_content_score":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskeywords":null,"_yoast_wpseo_keywordsynonyms":null,"_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":null,"rank_math_description":null,"surfer_last_post_update":null,"surfer_last_post_update_direction":null,"surfer_keywords":null,"surfer_location":null,"surfer_draft_id":null,"surfer_permalink_hash":null,"surfer_scrape_ready":null,"_thumbnail_id":"18698","footnotes":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18705","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18705"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18705\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18698"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18705"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18705"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18705"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}