{"id":19185,"date":"2026-04-19T11:52:03","date_gmt":"2026-04-19T09:52:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/dns-query-minimization-performance-resolver-cache-opti\/"},"modified":"2026-04-19T11:52:03","modified_gmt":"2026-04-19T09:52:03","slug":"dns-query-minimization-performance-resolver-cache-opti","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/dns-query-minimization-performance-resolver-cache-opti\/","title":{"rendered":"DNS Query Minimization: Performance effects and optimization"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>DNS Query Minimization<\/strong> reduces the data trace during name resolution, but can generate more queries and latency. I explain specifically how the RFC 9156 technology works, which performance effects are measurable and how I compensate for them with targeted optimizations.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Key points<\/h2>\n<p>The following key statements help me to strike the right balance between privacy and speed.<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Protection<\/strong> due to fewer disclosed labels per step<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Increased traffic<\/strong> from 15-26% with cold caches<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Error rate<\/strong> up to +5% without optimization<\/li>\n  <li><strong>PSL+1<\/strong> Reduces superfluous queries<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Caching<\/strong> and RFC 8198 reduce overhead<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/dnsoptimierung-rechenzentrum-1847.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>How DNS Query Minimization works<\/h2>\n\n<p>I send with <strong>QMIN<\/strong> not the full name immediately, but only the next label that leads to the delegation. Instead of sending \u201cwww.bigbank.example\u201d to the root, I first ask \u201cexample\u201d, then \u201cbigbank.example\u201d in the relevant place, and only at the end does the complete question go to the responsible host. This step-by-step resolution restricts the view to <strong>queried<\/strong> Information for root and TLD servers. RFC 9156 specifies the behavior compared to the older RFC 7816 and addresses special cases such as wildcards, CNAME cascades and NXDOMAIN. The implementations in BIND and Unbound adhere to these guidelines, which makes the privacy gain measurable.<\/p>\n\n<p>I benefit from less exposed <strong>Labels<\/strong> per query, but lose time if more levels become necessary. The design reduces data leaks, especially towards uninvolved infrastructure levels. Cloudflare confirms this strict implementation for 1.1.1.1, which reliably prevents leaks. In practice, the approach is particularly effective with deeply nested subdomains, because many delegation points occur there. I therefore consider early on what the zone structure looks like in day-to-day business and where minimization offers real added value.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Measurable performance effects in resolvers<\/h2>\n\n<p>More steps often mean more <strong>Traffic<\/strong>Measurements indicate increases of between 15 and 26 percent, depending on zone depth and cache status. In tests, traffic increased by around 17-19 percent with Unbound and 15-26 percent with BIND. With IPv6, the number of requests can reach up to 18, which significantly increases the latency per lookup. I also see up to 5 percent additional error cases and around 26 percent more queries if I don't fill caches. This adds up to noticeably longer page load times during peak times.<\/p>\n\n<p>I keep these <strong>Metrics<\/strong> because they explain perceived sluggishness in the front end. Cold caches drive up the effects, warm caches smooth them out. Negative responses (NXDOMAIN) can be cached better by minimizing them, which slows down subsequent incorrect queries. In successful cases, however, the overhead dominates if I don't take countermeasures. That's why I specifically plan to reduce the load on the resolver side.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/dns_query_meeting_4627.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Caching strategies and cold starts<\/h2>\n\n<p>I fill the <strong>Cache<\/strong> proactively before I make changes live and rely on sufficiently large storage windows. This means that recurring queries are less likely to hit the chain of delegations unprepared. Aggressive negative caching according to RFC 8198 saves further rounds because the resolver can deduce valid non-existence from NSEC\/NSEC3 information. Cold starts remain critical, for example after restarts or for new zones. As an introduction to the details, I refer you to this compact <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/dns-resolver-performance-caching-strategies-cacheboost\/\">Cache strategies<\/a>, which I use in practice.<\/p>\n\n<p>I choose sensible <strong>TTL<\/strong>-values: long enough for less load, short enough for moving services. Shortly before moves, I lower TTLs so that new records spread faster. After the change, I raise them again to keep the number of external queries low. This is noticeable in the frontend, as DNS often accounts for 10-25 percent of the perceived delay. This is how I use caching as a lever against QMIN overhead.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Serve stale, prefetch and drain buffer<\/h2>\n<p>I use \u201c<strong>Serve Stale<\/strong>\u201d (stale answers) and <strong>Prefetch<\/strong>, to cushion peak latencies. If authoritative servers are slow or temporarily unavailable, resolvers with Serve-Stale deliver expired responses for a short time until fresh data is reloaded. This decouples user experience and upstream slowness. Prefetch, on the other hand, reloads popular entries before their TTL expires. Both reduce the frequency with which QMIN has to go through the entire delegation chain again. Clear limits are important: I set short stale TTLs for security-relevant zones and only activate prefetch for frequent hits so that work and benefit are balanced.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Resolver Optimization with Public Suffix List<\/h2>\n\n<p>I often stop minimizing at <strong>PSL+1<\/strong>, directly below the public suffix list. Example: For \u201ca.b.example.com\u201d, I already send the full question after \u201cexample.com\u201d. This heuristic reduces duplication of work with minimal loss of privacy, because organizationally separate administration rarely affects deep subdomains. This reduces unnecessary round trips, which lowers latency and error rates. The IETF draft explicitly proposes this approach.<\/p>\n\n<p>I also use sensible <strong>Limits<\/strong> for the maximum depth per lookup. RFC 9156 specifies 10 as the cap, which is not enough for IPv6 in individual cases. In such scenarios, I help with targeted bypassing at known delegation points or use local hints. This reduces SERVFAIL peaks without exposing privacy. In this way, QMIN remains predictable, even in nested setups.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/dns-query-optimization-2375.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>EDNS, ECS, 0x20 and DNS cookies<\/h2>\n<p>I pay attention to how <strong>EDNS<\/strong>-extensions interact with QMIN. <strong>EDNS Client Subnet (ECS)<\/strong> can thwart privacy because parts of the client IP end up in the query. In environments with QMIN, I deliberately reduce or deactivate ECS unless I absolutely need it for geo load balancing. <strong>0x20 randomization<\/strong> (random case in QNAME) remains compatible and increases the resilience against spoofing without disturbing the minimization. <strong>DNS cookies<\/strong> help against reflection\/amplification and fit in well as they work at transport level. I monitor MTU and fragmentation: additional EDNS options can increase the response size, which triggers UDP fragmentation. If necessary, I switch to TCP or DoT\/DoH earlier to avoid losses.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Effects on hosting stacks and WordPress<\/h2>\n\n<p>I measure the DNA time in isolation, because already <strong>Milliseconds<\/strong> influence rankings, conversion and TTFB. With dynamic pages, database latencies and N+1 calls also add up. A fast resolver with a strong cache cushions these risks. Before planned moves, I lower TTLs so that users reach new IPs quickly and there are fewer incorrect queries. For architectural questions, it is worth taking a look at this compact <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/dns-architecture-hosting-resolver-ttl-performance-cacheboost\/\">DNS architecture<\/a>, which I use as a reference.<\/p>\n\n<p>I hold the <strong>Propagation<\/strong> visibly short so that users have a consistent experience. Fast DNS responses take the pressure off congestion at downstream nodes. In content management systems like WordPress, every jump in the chain counts. That's why I ensure clean name resolution before I start HTTP tuning. This prevents the actual web tuning from being slowed down by the DNS.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Forwarder topologies, anycast and CDN proximity<\/h2>\n<p>I make a conscious decision between <strong>Full resolver<\/strong> and <strong>Forwarder<\/strong>. If I forward requests to an upstream, the actual minimization takes place there; locally I see less overhead, but lose control over policies such as PSL+1. In my own data centers I operate full resolvers close to the application servers, often <strong>anycasted<\/strong>, to shorten paths and minimize jitter. For CDN-heavy workloads, I check whether the resolvers are geographically and network topologically close to the CDN egress points. This significantly reduces round trips and relativizes the additional overhead caused by QMIN.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Security aspects: DoT, DoH and DNSSEC<\/h2>\n\n<p>I combine <strong>QMIN<\/strong> with DNS-over-TLS or DNS-over-HTTPS so that nobody reads queries on the move. Minimization restricts metadata, encryption secures the transport. Together, both approaches significantly reduce the attack surface. I also check whether resolvers and authoritative nodes speak the same security profiles. This prevents misunderstandings between nodes.<\/p>\n\n<p>I rely on signed <strong>zones<\/strong> via DNSSEC so that I can detect manipulation at an early stage. The chain of trust strengthens response integrity and limits troubleshooting. This practical guide provides clear instructions <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/dnssec-hosting-security-implementation-trustchain\/\">DNSSEC implementation<\/a>, which I use in projects. QMIN and DNSSEC complement each other because less exposed names plus signatures offer more protection. This is how I protect both content and metadata.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/dnsqueryoptmz4456.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Metrics and monitoring for QMIN<\/h2>\n\n<p>I observe <strong>Key figures<\/strong> continuously to clearly assign effects. This includes the number of queries per lookup, proportion of NXDOMAIN\/NOERROR\/SERVFAIL, average latency and 95th\/99th percentiles. I separate cold and warm caches because the curves there are very different. Verisign and SIDN Labs report more short queries at root\/TLD level, which relieves my measurements on Authoritative and puts more demand on Resolver. QMIN clearly reflects this shift.<\/p>\n\n<table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th><strong>Key figure<\/strong><\/th>\n      <th><strong>Without QMIN<\/strong><\/th>\n      <th><strong>With QMIN<\/strong><\/th>\n      <th><strong>interpretation<\/strong><\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Queries\/Lookup<\/td>\n      <td>1-4<\/td>\n      <td>3-8 (IPv6 to 18)<\/td>\n      <td>More steps increase steps<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Traffic increase<\/td>\n      <td>Base<\/td>\n      <td>+15-26%<\/td>\n      <td>Label-by-label resolution costs<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Error rate<\/td>\n      <td>low<\/td>\n      <td>up to +5%<\/td>\n      <td>Borderline cases and limits apply<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>NXDOMAIN hit rate<\/td>\n      <td>medium<\/td>\n      <td>higher<\/td>\n      <td>Aggressive negative caching works<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>P95 Latency<\/td>\n      <td>constant<\/td>\n      <td>increased with cold cache<\/td>\n      <td>Cache filling is crucial<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n<p>I also check <strong>Logs<\/strong> for atypical series of uniform, short QNAMEs that indicate strict minimization. Combined with active tests against test zones, the impact can be quickly quantified. For front-end perspectives, I use RUM data to visualize DNS portions of the load path. The correlation with deployments quickly reveals misconfigurations. This is how I link metrics with measures, not just with symptom debates.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Benchmarking setup and troubleshooting<\/h2>\n<p>I separate clean <strong>Laboratory measurements<\/strong> of production telemetries. In the lab, I feed in reproducible zone trunks (deep CNAME chains, wildcards, IPv6 PTR trees) and measure queries\/lookup, P50\/P95, retry rates and UDP\u2192TCP fallbacks. In production, I use sampling from DNSTap or query logs to detect hotspots. In the case of outliers, I trace affected QNAMEs and delegation paths and search specifically for inconsistencies (NS\/DS mismatch, outdated glue records, lame delegations). Important: I correlate peaks with deployments or TTL sequences because QMIN makes the natural \u201cpulse\u201d of zones more visible.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Practical guide: Steps to optimization<\/h2>\n\n<p>I activate <strong>QMIN<\/strong> in BIND\/Unbound, set PSL+1, and carefully limit the maximum query depth. I then set the cache size, prefetch and Aggressive NSEC\/NSEC3 (RFC 8198). Before releases, I lower TTLs, preheat caches with synthetic queries and increase TTLs again after the changeover. In networks with many IPv6 records, I test the depth separately and offload recurring authoritative queries to local mirrors. This allows me to keep latency and error rates under control without sacrificing privacy.<\/p>\n\n<p>I document <strong>Fallbacks<\/strong> for special cases, such as split horizons, wildcards and CNAME chains. Where QMIN leads to dead ends, I selectively use full names for defined zones. These exceptions remain small and verifiable. After stabilization, I switch them off again. In this way, the standard path remains clean and reliable.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/dns_query_minimization_4782.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Configuration examples: BIND and Unbound<\/h2>\n<p>I keep configurations concise and verifiable. I set clear switches and conservative limits for BIND and Unbound:<\/p>\n<pre><code># BIND (excerpt)\noptions {\n  qname-minimization yes;\n  qname-minimization-strict yes; \/\/ relax for PSL+1 policy if required\n  minimal-responses yes; \/\/ prefer lean responses\n  max-recursion-depth 10; \/\/ according to RFC 9156, increase if necessary\n  prefetch yes; \/\/ renew popular entries in advance\n  stale-answer-enable yes; \/\/ Serve Stale\n  stale-answer-ttl 300; \/\/ keep it short, security-conscious\n  lame-ttl 600; \/\/ Cache lame delegations shorter\n  \/\/ Adapt cache sizes and TTL policies zone-specifically\n};\n\n# Unbound (excerpt)\nserver:\n  qname-minimization: yes\n  qname-minimization-strict: yes # for PSL+1 heuristics possibly no + Policy\n  aggressive-nsec: yes # RFC 8198\n  prefetch: yes\n  prefetch-key: yes\n  serve-expired: yes # RFC 8767-like behavior\n  serve-expired-ttl: 300\n  cache-max-ttl: 86400\n  cache-min-ttl: 60\n  msg-cache-size: 256m\n  rrset-cache-size: 512m\n  harden-below-nxdomain: yes\n  val-clean-additional: yes # Bailiwick hardening\n<\/code><\/pre>\n<p>The <strong>PSL+1<\/strong>-I implement this heuristic as a local policy: I add resolver logic that stops earlier below public suffixes, or I specifically define known delegation points. This allows me to maintain control without loosening protection across the board.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Edge cases: IPv6, split horizon, wildcards<\/h2>\n\n<p>I pay attention to <strong>IPv6<\/strong> the potentially large number of labels in PTR records, which can easily break the query limits. In split-horizon setups, I check whether internal and external views use identical delegation points. With wildcards, aggressive negative caching helps me to avoid unnecessary rounds. I specifically test wildcard chains because they lead to different paths with QMIN than without. These tests save me time-consuming troubleshooting later on.<\/p>\n\n<p>I look at <strong>delegation<\/strong>-consistency so that NS and DS records match on all authoritative servers. Inconsistencies increase the number of queries with QMIN and increase the error rate. Outdated glue records also cause avoidable extra hops. Such hygiene pays off every day. Clean zones bring noticeable speed, regardless of minimization.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/dns-query-optimierung-3587.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Authoritative servers: Response policy and hygiene<\/h2>\n<p>I leave authoritative as far as possible <strong>minimal<\/strong> (no superfluous additional data) and pay attention to consistent NS\/DS records across all secondaries. For delegating zones I consider <strong>Glue-Records<\/strong> fresh and set TTLs that match the change frequencies. With extensive SVCB\/HTTPS setups, I make sure that alias chains remain short, otherwise additional hops accumulate with QMIN. Where necessary, I mirror external authoritative locally (read-only mirror) to save recurring delegation steps.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Common error patterns and quick remedies<\/h2>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>SERVFAIL tips after Deploy:<\/strong> Mostly missing DS synchronization or new delegations without matching glue. I roll back to the previous zone version and then publish coordinated NS\/DS\/Glue.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>High P95 latency with cold cache:<\/strong> I activate Prefetch\/Serve-Stale, temporarily increase cache sizes and preheat hot zones synthetically.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Many Retries\/UDP\u2192TCP:<\/strong> Check EDNS buffer, test MTU path, switch to TCP\/DoT earlier and throttle oversized responses (ANY, large TXT).<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Unexpectedly deep lookups:<\/strong> Measure CNAME\/SVCB chains, sharpen PSL+1 policy and whitelist known delegation points.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Privacy leak despite QMIN:<\/strong> Deactivate or fine-tune ECS, retain case randomization, encrypt transport.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h2>Short and sweet: My recommendations<\/h2>\n\n<p>I rely on <strong>QMIN<\/strong> plus caching, add PSL+1, and keep limits realistic. I combat cold starts with preheating and suitable TTL cycles. In secure environments, I encrypt transport routes using DoT\/DoH and rely on DNSSEC to ensure integrity. I link monitoring with clear thresholds for queries\/lookup, error rate and P95 latency. This is how I achieve a resilient balance between privacy and speed.<\/p>\n\n<p>I check <strong>Latency<\/strong> regularly with synthetic tests and real user values. I track conspicuous increases up to the delegation level at which they occur. I keep exceptions small and limited in time. After improvements, I roll back to the standard. This disciplined cycle keeps the overhead low and privacy high.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Practical summary<\/h2>\n<p>I do not view QMIN in isolation, but rather as part of a <strong>Overall designs<\/strong> from resolver topology, caching policy, transport encryption and zone hygiene. The technology reliably reduces metadata leaks and distributes the resolution path over several small steps. This results in measurable additional queries - especially with cold caches and long chains. I compensate for this with PSL+1, aggressive NSEC usage, prefetch\/serve stale, clean delegations and short alias chains. With clear key figures, targeted limits and selective exceptions, I achieve stable operation in which privacy and performance are not compromised. <strong>at the same time<\/strong> win. This means that DNS remains a viable basis for fast, secure hosting stacks - even under load and with frequent changes.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DNS Query Minimization protects privacy but affects DNS performance. Learn Resolver Optimization for optimal results.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":19178,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_crdt_document":"","inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[674],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19185","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-web_hosting"],"acf":[],"_wp_attached_file":null,"_wp_attachment_metadata":null,"litespeed-optimize-size":null,"litespeed-optimize-set":null,"_elementor_source_image_hash":null,"_wp_attachment_image_alt":null,"stockpack_author_name":null,"stockpack_author_url":null,"stockpack_provider":null,"stockpack_image_url":null,"stockpack_license":null,"stockpack_license_url":null,"stockpack_modification":null,"color":null,"original_id":null,"original_url":null,"original_link":null,"unsplash_location":null,"unsplash_sponsor":null,"unsplash_exif":null,"unsplash_attachment_metadata":null,"_elementor_is_screenshot":null,"surfer_file_name":null,"surfer_file_original_url":null,"envato_tk_source_kit":null,"envato_tk_source_index":null,"envato_tk_manifest":null,"envato_tk_folder_name":null,"envato_tk_builder":null,"envato_elements_download_event":null,"_menu_item_type":null,"_menu_item_menu_item_parent":null,"_menu_item_object_id":null,"_menu_item_object":null,"_menu_item_target":null,"_menu_item_classes":null,"_menu_item_xfn":null,"_menu_item_url":null,"_trp_menu_languages":null,"rank_math_primary_category":null,"rank_math_title":null,"inline_featured_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":null,"rank_math_schema_blogposting":null,"rank_math_schema_videoobject":null,"_oembed_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_oembed_time_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":null,"_yoast_wpseo_linkdex":null,"_oembed_27e3473bf8bec795fbeb3a9d38489348":null,"_oembed_c3b0f6959478faf92a1f343d8f96b19e":null,"_trp_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_desired_post_slug":null,"_yoast_wpseo_title":null,"tldname":null,"tldpreis":null,"tldrubrik":null,"tldpolicylink":null,"tldsize":null,"tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"tldtransfer":null,"tldwhoisprivacy":null,"tldregistrarchange":null,"tldregistrantchange":null,"tldwhoisupdate":null,"tldnameserverupdate":null,"tlddeletesofort":null,"tlddeleteexpire":null,"tldumlaute":null,"tldrestore":null,"tldsubcategory":null,"tldbildname":null,"tldbildurl":null,"tldclean":null,"tldcategory":null,"tldpolicy":null,"tldbesonderheiten":null,"tld_bedeutung":null,"_oembed_d167040d816d8f94c072940c8009f5f8":null,"_oembed_b0a0fa59ef14f8870da2c63f2027d064":null,"_oembed_4792fa4dfb2a8f09ab950a73b7f313ba":null,"_oembed_33ceb1fe54a8ab775d9410abf699878d":null,"_oembed_fd7014d14d919b45ec004937c0db9335":null,"_oembed_21a029d076783ec3e8042698c351bd7e":null,"_oembed_be5ea8a0c7b18e658f08cc571a909452":null,"_oembed_a9ca7a298b19f9b48ec5914e010294d2":null,"_oembed_f8db6b27d08a2bb1f920e7647808899a":null,"_oembed_168ebde5096e77d8a89326519af9e022":null,"_oembed_cdb76f1b345b42743edfe25481b6f98f":null,"_oembed_87b0613611ae54e86e8864265404b0a1":null,"_oembed_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_oembed_time_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_tldname":null,"_tldclean":null,"_tldpreis":null,"_tldcategory":null,"_tldsubcategory":null,"_tldpolicy":null,"_tldpolicylink":null,"_tldsize":null,"_tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"_tldtransfer":null,"_tldwhoisprivacy":null,"_tldregistrarchange":null,"_tldregistrantchange":null,"_tldwhoisupdate":null,"_tldnameserverupdate":null,"_tlddeletesofort":null,"_tlddeleteexpire":null,"_tldumlaute":null,"_tldrestore":null,"_tldbildname":null,"_tldbildurl":null,"_tld_bedeutung":null,"_tldbesonderheiten":null,"_oembed_ad96e4112edb9f8ffa35731d4098bc6b":null,"_oembed_8357e2b8a2575c74ed5978f262a10126":null,"_oembed_3d5fea5103dd0d22ec5d6a33eff7f863":null,"_eael_widget_elements":null,"_oembed_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_oembed_time_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_aioseo_description":null,"_eb_attr":null,"_eb_data_table":null,"_oembed_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_oembed_time_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_acf_changed":null,"_wpcode_auto_insert":null,"_edit_last":null,"_edit_lock":null,"_oembed_e7b913c6c84084ed9702cb4feb012ddd":null,"_oembed_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_time_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"_oembed_time_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"rank_math_news_sitemap_robots":null,"rank_math_robots":null,"_eael_post_view_count":"87","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ru_ru":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_et":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lv":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fr_fr":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_old_slug":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_da_dk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pl_pl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_es_es":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_hu_hu":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fi":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ja":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lt_lt":null,"_elementor_edit_mode":null,"_elementor_template_type":null,"_elementor_version":null,"_elementor_pro_version":null,"_wp_page_template":null,"_elementor_page_settings":null,"_elementor_data":null,"_elementor_css":null,"_elementor_conditions":null,"_happyaddons_elements_cache":null,"_oembed_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_time_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_time_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_time_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_time_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_oembed_time_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_elementor_screenshot":null,"_oembed_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_oembed_time_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_elementor_controls_usage":null,"_elementor_page_assets":[],"_elementor_screenshot_failed":null,"theplus_transient_widgets":null,"_eael_custom_js":null,"_wp_old_date":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_it_it":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_pt":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_zh_cn":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_nl_nl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_br":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sv_se":null,"rank_math_analytic_object_id":null,"rank_math_internal_links_processed":"1","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ro_ro":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sk_sk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_bg_bg":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sl_si":null,"litespeed_vpi_list":null,"litespeed_vpi_list_mobile":null,"rank_math_seo_score":null,"rank_math_contentai_score":null,"ilj_limitincominglinks":null,"ilj_maxincominglinks":null,"ilj_limitoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_maxoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_limitlinksperparagraph":null,"ilj_linksperparagraph":null,"ilj_blacklistdefinition":null,"ilj_linkdefinition":null,"_eb_reusable_block_ids":null,"rank_math_focus_keyword":"DNS Query Minimization","rank_math_og_content_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_content_score":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskeywords":null,"_yoast_wpseo_keywordsynonyms":null,"_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":null,"rank_math_description":null,"surfer_last_post_update":null,"surfer_last_post_update_direction":null,"surfer_keywords":null,"surfer_location":null,"surfer_draft_id":null,"surfer_permalink_hash":null,"surfer_scrape_ready":null,"_thumbnail_id":"19178","footnotes":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19185","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19185"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19185\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19178"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19185"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19185"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19185"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}