{"id":19425,"date":"2026-05-17T08:36:29","date_gmt":"2026-05-17T06:36:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/server-tcp-window-scaling-durchsatzoptimierung-netzwerktuning\/"},"modified":"2026-05-17T08:36:29","modified_gmt":"2026-05-17T06:36:29","slug":"server-tcp-window-scaling-throughput-optimization-network-tuning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/server-tcp-window-scaling-durchsatzoptimierung-netzwerktuning\/","title":{"rendered":"Server TCP window scaling and throughput optimization in the data center"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Server TCP<\/strong> Window scaling determines the usable throughput per connection in data centers, especially with high bandwidth and double-digit RTT. I show how I calculate the receive window, scale it dynamically and use targeted tuning to eliminate the bottleneck between <strong>Window size<\/strong> and latency.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Key points<\/h2>\n\n<p>I will summarize the most important statements in advance so that the article provides quick orientation. I will concentrate on window size, RTT, bandwidth-delay product and sensible system parameters. Each statement pays direct dividends in terms of reproducible data throughput. I avoid theory without reference and provide applicable steps. This creates a clear path from diagnosis to <strong>Tuning<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Window scaling<\/strong> removes the 64 KB limit and enables large windows.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>RTT<\/strong> and window size determine the maximum throughput (\u2248 Window\/RTT).<\/li>\n  <li><strong>BDP<\/strong> shows the window size required for full link utilization.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Buffer<\/strong> and auto-tuning of the OS stacks drive real performance.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Multi-streams<\/strong> and protocol parameters increase data transfer.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/rechenzentrum-tcp-9204.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Why window size and RTT dictate throughput<\/h2>\n\n<p>I calculate the upper limit per connection with the simple formula Throughput \u2248 <strong>Window<\/strong>\/RTT. A 64 KB window and 50 ms RTT deliver around 10 Mbit\/s, even if the optical fiber allows 1 Gbit\/s. This discrepancy is particularly noticeable over long distances and WAN paths. The greater the latency, the more a small window slows down the transfer. I therefore prioritize a sufficiently large receive window size instead of just buying bandwidth that remains unused. This is how I address the actual adjusting screw in the <strong>TCP stack<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Limits of the classic TCP window<\/h2>\n\n<p>The original 16-bit window limits the value to 65,535 bytes and thus sets a hard limit for <strong>Throughput<\/strong> at high RTT. This is rarely noticeable in a LAN, but over continents the rate drops drastically to single-digit or low double-digit Mbit\/s. An example shows this clearly: 64 KB at 100 ms RTT only results in around 5 Mbit\/s. This is not enough for backups, replication or large file transfers. I solve this limit by consistently using window scaling. <strong>activate<\/strong> and check the negotiation.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Konferenz_TCP_Optimierung_7823.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>How TCP Window Scaling works<\/h2>\n\n<p>With the option <strong>Window Scale<\/strong> I enlarge the logical window via an exponent (0-14), which is negotiated during the SYN handshake. The effective window results from Header-Window \u00d7 2^Scale and can thus grow to sizes up to the gigabyte range. It is crucial that both endpoints accept the option and that no intermediate component filters it. I check the handshake in Wireshark and pay attention to the option in SYN and SYN\/ACK. If it's missing, the connection falls back to 64 KB, which means the <strong>Throughput<\/strong> limited immediately.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Dynamic window sizes in current systems<\/h2>\n\n<p>Modern Linux kernels and Windows servers adapt the <strong>RWIN<\/strong> dynamically and grow to several megabytes under favorable conditions. Under Linux I control the behavior via <code>net.ipv4.tcp_rmem<\/code>, <code>net.ipv4.tcp_wmem<\/code> and <code>net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling<\/code>. Under Windows I check with <code>netsh int tcp show global<\/code>, whether auto-tuning is active. I make sure that sufficient buffers are available on both sides so that growth does not stop at maximum values. This is how I take advantage of the automatic scaling in the <strong>Productive operation<\/strong> from.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Estimate BDP correctly: How big should the window be?<\/h2>\n\n<p>The bandwidth delay product (<strong>BDP<\/strong>) provides me with the target value for the TCP window: bandwidth \u00d7 RTT. I set the receive window to at least this value in order to utilize the line. Without a sufficient buffer, the connection will fall far short of the nominal bandwidth. The following table shows typical combinations of RTT and bandwidth with required window sizes and the limit of a 64 KB window. This allows me to see at a glance how much a small window with <strong>WAN<\/strong>-distance brakes.<\/p>\n\n<table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th>RTT<\/th>\n      <th>Bandwidth<\/th>\n      <th>BDP (MBit)<\/th>\n      <th>Minimum window (MB)<\/th>\n      <th>Throughput with 64 KB<\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td>20 ms<\/td>\n      <td>1 Gbit\/s<\/td>\n      <td>20<\/td>\n      <td>\u2248 2,5<\/td>\n      <td>\u2248 26 Mbit\/s<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>50 ms<\/td>\n      <td>1 Gbit\/s<\/td>\n      <td>50<\/td>\n      <td>\u2248 6,25<\/td>\n      <td>\u2248 10 Mbit\/s<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>100 ms<\/td>\n      <td>1 Gbit\/s<\/td>\n      <td>100<\/td>\n      <td>\u2248 12,5<\/td>\n      <td>\u2248 5 Mbit\/s<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>50 ms<\/td>\n      <td>10 Gbit\/s<\/td>\n      <td>500<\/td>\n      <td>\u2248 62,5<\/td>\n      <td>\u2248 10 Mbit\/s<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/tcp-optimization-datacenter-4321.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Practical tuning: from measuring to fitting<\/h2>\n\n<p>I start with measurements: <code>ping<\/code> and <code>traceroute<\/code> provide the RTT, <code>iperf3<\/code> measures inlet and outlet rates and <code>Wireshark<\/code> shows the negotiated <strong>Scaling<\/strong> in the handshake. If the window in the trace remains at 64 KB, I search for devices that filter or change options. I check firewalls, VPN gateways and load balancers for RFC1323 compliance. If the negotiation is suitable, I check the buffer limits and maximum auto-tuning limits of the OS. In addition, I evaluate the choice of congestion control algorithm, as its reaction to losses and latency reflects the real-world performance. <strong>Throughput<\/strong> strongly influenced; I summarize details in the article <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/tcp-congestion-control-effects-comparison-latency\/\">TCP Congestion Control<\/a> together.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Select receive and send buffers sensibly<\/h2>\n\n<p>I base my buffer sizing on my <strong>BDP<\/strong> and set the maximum values generously, but in a controlled manner. Under Linux I adjust <code>net.ipv4.tcp_rmem<\/code> and <code>net.ipv4.tcp_wmem<\/code> (minimum\/default\/maximum in each case) and keep a margin for long distances. Under Windows, I check auto-tuning levels and document changes in the TCP stack. Important: Larger buffers require RAM, so I evaluate the number and type of my high-load connections. I go into more detail on the background and examples of correct buffer selection in the article <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/server-socket-buffers-hosting-tuning-bufferopti\/\">Socket buffer tuning<\/a>, which makes the relationships between buffers, RWIN and latency tangible.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/nacht_tech_optierung_6789.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Parallelization: targeted use of multiple TCP streams<\/h2>\n\n<p>Even with a large window, I often achieve more in practice if I use several <strong>streams<\/strong> in parallel. Many backup tools, downloaders or sync solutions already do this by default. Parallelization allows me to bypass per-connection limits in middleboxes and smooth out fluctuations in individual flows. I segment transfers according to files or blocks and define sensible concurrency values. This allows me to spread the risk and gain additional percentage points <strong>Bandwidth<\/strong> out.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Fine-tune the protocol and application level<\/h2>\n\n<p>Not all software uses large <strong>Windows<\/strong> efficient because additional confirmations or small block sizes slow down the data transfer. I increase block sizes, activate pipelining and set up parallel requests if the application offers this. Modern SMB versions, up-to-date HTTP stacks and optimized backup engines benefit measurably from this. I also check TLS offloading, MSS clamping and jumbo frames if the entire chain supports them properly. These adjustments complement window scaling and raise the real <strong>Throughput<\/strong> on.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/rechenzentrum_optimierung_4762.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Understanding auto-tuning: Limits, heuristics and sensible defaults<\/h2>\n<p>Auto-tuning is not a sure-fire success. Under Linux, in addition to <code>tcp_rmem<\/code>\/<code>tcp_wmem<\/code> above all <code>net.core.rmem_max<\/code> and <code>net.core.wmem_max<\/code> is the upper limit per socket. Values such as 64-256 MB are recommended for WAN transfers with high <strong>BDP<\/strong>-requirements are common. I activate <code>net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf=1<\/code>, so that the kernel progressively boots the Receive Window, and check <code>net.ipv4.tcp_adv_win_scale<\/code>, which determines how aggressively free buffers are converted into window size. <code>tcp_timestamps<\/code> and <code>SACK<\/code> I keep them active, as they make retransmissions targeted and are indispensable with large windows.<\/p>\n<p>Under Windows I observe the behavior with <code>netsh int tcp show global<\/code> and <code>netsh int tcp show heuristics<\/code>. I usually set the car tuning level to <em>normal<\/em> and deactivate heuristics that unnecessarily throttle window growth for paths recognized as \u201eslow links\u201c. Important in both worlds: Applications that explicitly <code>SO_RCVBUF<\/code>\/<code>SO_SNDBUF<\/code> can effectively slow down auto-tuning. I therefore check server processes (e.g. proxies, transfer daemons) for such overrides and adjust them accordingly.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Trace analysis: What I check in the handshake and data flow<\/h2>\n<p>In Wireshark I validate in SYN\/SYN-ACK next to <strong>Window Scale<\/strong> also <em>SACK Permitted<\/em>, <em>Timestamps<\/em> and the <em>MSS<\/em>. In the data flow, I look at \u201eBytes in flight\u201c, \u201eTCP Window Size value\u201c and \u201eCalculated Window Size\u201c. If the calculated window remains unchanged despite a high <code>rmem<\/code> flat, blocking limits or the application is <em>application-limited<\/em>. I also use the TCP stream graphs (time-sequence, window scaling) to see whether the window grows dynamically and whether retransmissions or out-of-order packets cancel out the effect.<\/p>\n\n<h2>MTU, MSS and jumbo frames: how much they really bring<\/h2>\n<p>Large windows are only effective if the pipeline is filled efficiently. I therefore check the effective MTU along the path. With <code>ip link<\/code> and <code>ethtool<\/code> I recognize local limits, with <code>ping -M do -s<\/code> I test Path-MTU. If PMTUD fails, I activate it under Linux <code>net.ipv4.tcp_mtu_probing=1<\/code> or use sensible MSS clamping on edge devices to avoid fragmentation. Jumbo frames (9000) are worthwhile within a homogeneously configured fabric, reduce CPU load and increase <strong>Goodput<\/strong>. Over heterogeneous or WAN path segments, on the other hand, I prioritize clean PMTUD and consistent MSS values over raw MTU increases.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Losses, ECN and queue management<\/h2>\n<p>With large windows, even small packet loss rates are enough to massively reduce the real throughput. I therefore actively check whether ECN is supported and not cleared along the path, and combine this with AQM (e.g. FQ-CoDel) on edge interfaces. This lowers the <em>Queueing Delay<\/em> and prevents bufferbloat without keeping the window artificially small. On Linux, modern loss detectors such as RACK\/TLP help me to close tails faster. In environments with frequent bursts, I rely on pacing-capable congestion control (e.g. CUBIC with byte queue limits or BBR), but still make sure that the receive window is large enough - even BBR cannot deliver without adequate RWIN.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Server and application view: conscious use of socket options<\/h2>\n<p>Many server processes set buffer sizes hard and thus limit growth. I explicitly check the start and peak values with <code>ss -ti<\/code> (Linux) and observe <em>skmem<\/em>\/<em>rcv_space<\/em>. At the application level, I adjust block and record sizes, deactivate Nagle (<code>TCP_NODELAY<\/code>) only where latency per message is more critical than throughput, and reduce delayed ACK effects by using larger transmission units. For file transfers I use <code>sendfile()<\/code> or zero-copy mechanisms as well as asynchronous I\/O so that the user space does not become a bottleneck.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Scaling to 10\/25\/40\/100G: CPU, offloads and multiqueue<\/h2>\n<p>Large windows demand the host. I make sure that TSO\/GSO and GRO\/LRO are active so that the system handles large segments efficiently. I use RSS\/Multiqueue to distribute flows to multiple cores, adjust IRQ affinity to NUMA topologies and monitor SoftIRQ load. On the device side, I adjust ring buffers and interrupt coalescing so that the host does not run into interrupt storms. All this ensures that window scaling does not fail due to CPU limits and that the rates achieved remain reproducible.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Step-by-step path: From target rate to configuration<\/h2>\n<ul>\n  <li>Define target: desired throughput and measured RTT (e.g. 5 Gbit\/s at 40 ms).<\/li>\n  <li><strong>BDP<\/strong> calculate: 5 Gbit\/s \u00d7 0.04 s = 200 Mbit \u2248 25 MB window.<\/li>\n  <li>Set Linux limits: <code>sysctl -w net.core.rmem_max=268435456<\/code>, <code>net.core.wmem_max=268435456<\/code>, <code>net.ipv4.tcp_rmem=\"4096 87380 268435456\"<\/code>, <code>net.ipv4.tcp_wmem=\"4096 65536 268435456\"<\/code>, <code>net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf=1<\/code>.<\/li>\n  <li>Check Windows: <code>netsh int tcp show global<\/code>; Car tuning <em>normal<\/em>, not throttling heuristics.<\/li>\n  <li>Validate handshake: Wireshark - Window Scale, MSS, SACK\/Timestamps available.<\/li>\n  <li>Secure MTU\/MSS: PMTUD functional or MSS camping along the path.<\/li>\n  <li>Set congestion control and AQM: CUBIC\/BBR matching the profile; ECN\/AQM active on Edge.<\/li>\n  <li>With <code>iperf3<\/code> verify: Single- and Multi-Stream (<code>-P<\/code>), with\/without TLS\/application.<\/li>\n  <li>Check application buffer: no small <code>SO_RCVBUF<\/code>\/<code>SO_SNDBUF<\/code> set, increase block sizes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h2>Typical pitfalls and quick checks<\/h2>\n\n<p>I often come across firewalls or routers that <strong>Options<\/strong> in the TCP header or discard them. Asymmetric paths exacerbate the problem because the outbound and return paths run through different policies. Aggressive TCP normalizing in access routers also destroys correct negotiation. Too tight buffers and timeouts lead to long recovery phases in the event of losses. I test changes in isolated windows, observe retransmissions and make adjustments step by step so that the <strong>Stability<\/strong> is preserved.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Hosting and data center context<\/h2>\n\n<p>In productive setups, many clients share the same <strong>Infrastructure<\/strong>, efficient use per connection counts. I benefit from leaf-spine topologies, short east-west paths and sufficient uplinks. Modern congestion control algorithms, clean queue management and robust QoS rules make the results reproducible. I plan window sizes and buffers with peak loads and parallel sessions in mind. This keeps performance consistent and the effect of <strong>Window scaling<\/strong> arrives at all services.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/servernetzwerkoptimierung-1837.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Monitoring and ongoing optimization<\/h2>\n\n<p>I measure regularly with <code>iperf3<\/code> between locations, track RTT, jitter, retransmissions and <strong>Goodput<\/strong>. Flow data and sFlow\/NetFlow help me to recognize patterns in traffic in good time. In the case of outliers, I check packet losses, as even low rates severely dampen throughput; I summarize how I approach this efficiently in <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/network-packet-loss-website-slowdown-analysis\/\">Analyze packet loss<\/a> together. I run time series dashboards so that trend breaks are immediately visible. This keeps my tuning effective and allows me to react to changes in paths, policies or load profiles before they occur. <strong>Users<\/strong> feel it.<\/p>\n\n<h2>A brief summary from practice<\/h2>\n\n<p>Large windows via <strong>Window scaling<\/strong>, The right buffers and a properly negotiated handshake put the lever in the right place. I calculate the BDP, measure the real RTT and set the maximum values so that auto-tuning can grow. I then check the protocol parameters and use parallelization if necessary. If the throughput falls short of expectations, I look specifically for middleboxes that filter options and optimize congestion control including queue behaviour. This is how I utilize the available <strong>Bandwidth<\/strong> even on long journeys and save me expensive hardware upgrades that don't solve the actual bottleneck.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Learn how Server TCP Window Scaling, Bandwidth-Delay-Product and Network Tuning work together and how you can optimize the throughput of your connections with the focus keyword Server TCP Window Scaling.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":19418,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_crdt_document":"","inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[676],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19425","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-server_vm"],"acf":[],"_wp_attached_file":null,"_wp_attachment_metadata":null,"litespeed-optimize-size":null,"litespeed-optimize-set":null,"_elementor_source_image_hash":null,"_wp_attachment_image_alt":null,"stockpack_author_name":null,"stockpack_author_url":null,"stockpack_provider":null,"stockpack_image_url":null,"stockpack_license":null,"stockpack_license_url":null,"stockpack_modification":null,"color":null,"original_id":null,"original_url":null,"original_link":null,"unsplash_location":null,"unsplash_sponsor":null,"unsplash_exif":null,"unsplash_attachment_metadata":null,"_elementor_is_screenshot":null,"surfer_file_name":null,"surfer_file_original_url":null,"envato_tk_source_kit":null,"envato_tk_source_index":null,"envato_tk_manifest":null,"envato_tk_folder_name":null,"envato_tk_builder":null,"envato_elements_download_event":null,"_menu_item_type":null,"_menu_item_menu_item_parent":null,"_menu_item_object_id":null,"_menu_item_object":null,"_menu_item_target":null,"_menu_item_classes":null,"_menu_item_xfn":null,"_menu_item_url":null,"_trp_menu_languages":null,"rank_math_primary_category":null,"rank_math_title":null,"inline_featured_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":null,"rank_math_schema_blogposting":null,"rank_math_schema_videoobject":null,"_oembed_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_oembed_time_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":null,"_yoast_wpseo_linkdex":null,"_oembed_27e3473bf8bec795fbeb3a9d38489348":null,"_oembed_c3b0f6959478faf92a1f343d8f96b19e":null,"_trp_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_desired_post_slug":null,"_yoast_wpseo_title":null,"tldname":null,"tldpreis":null,"tldrubrik":null,"tldpolicylink":null,"tldsize":null,"tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"tldtransfer":null,"tldwhoisprivacy":null,"tldregistrarchange":null,"tldregistrantchange":null,"tldwhoisupdate":null,"tldnameserverupdate":null,"tlddeletesofort":null,"tlddeleteexpire":null,"tldumlaute":null,"tldrestore":null,"tldsubcategory":null,"tldbildname":null,"tldbildurl":null,"tldclean":null,"tldcategory":null,"tldpolicy":null,"tldbesonderheiten":null,"tld_bedeutung":null,"_oembed_d167040d816d8f94c072940c8009f5f8":null,"_oembed_b0a0fa59ef14f8870da2c63f2027d064":null,"_oembed_4792fa4dfb2a8f09ab950a73b7f313ba":null,"_oembed_33ceb1fe54a8ab775d9410abf699878d":null,"_oembed_fd7014d14d919b45ec004937c0db9335":null,"_oembed_21a029d076783ec3e8042698c351bd7e":null,"_oembed_be5ea8a0c7b18e658f08cc571a909452":null,"_oembed_a9ca7a298b19f9b48ec5914e010294d2":null,"_oembed_f8db6b27d08a2bb1f920e7647808899a":null,"_oembed_168ebde5096e77d8a89326519af9e022":null,"_oembed_cdb76f1b345b42743edfe25481b6f98f":null,"_oembed_87b0613611ae54e86e8864265404b0a1":null,"_oembed_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_oembed_time_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_tldname":null,"_tldclean":null,"_tldpreis":null,"_tldcategory":null,"_tldsubcategory":null,"_tldpolicy":null,"_tldpolicylink":null,"_tldsize":null,"_tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"_tldtransfer":null,"_tldwhoisprivacy":null,"_tldregistrarchange":null,"_tldregistrantchange":null,"_tldwhoisupdate":null,"_tldnameserverupdate":null,"_tlddeletesofort":null,"_tlddeleteexpire":null,"_tldumlaute":null,"_tldrestore":null,"_tldbildname":null,"_tldbildurl":null,"_tld_bedeutung":null,"_tldbesonderheiten":null,"_oembed_ad96e4112edb9f8ffa35731d4098bc6b":null,"_oembed_8357e2b8a2575c74ed5978f262a10126":null,"_oembed_3d5fea5103dd0d22ec5d6a33eff7f863":null,"_eael_widget_elements":null,"_oembed_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_oembed_time_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_aioseo_description":null,"_eb_attr":null,"_eb_data_table":null,"_oembed_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_oembed_time_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_acf_changed":null,"_wpcode_auto_insert":null,"_edit_last":null,"_edit_lock":null,"_oembed_e7b913c6c84084ed9702cb4feb012ddd":null,"_oembed_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_time_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"_oembed_time_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"rank_math_news_sitemap_robots":null,"rank_math_robots":null,"_eael_post_view_count":"96","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ru_ru":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_et":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lv":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fr_fr":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_old_slug":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_da_dk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pl_pl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_es_es":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_hu_hu":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fi":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ja":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lt_lt":null,"_elementor_edit_mode":null,"_elementor_template_type":null,"_elementor_version":null,"_elementor_pro_version":null,"_wp_page_template":null,"_elementor_page_settings":null,"_elementor_data":null,"_elementor_css":null,"_elementor_conditions":null,"_happyaddons_elements_cache":null,"_oembed_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_time_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_time_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_time_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_time_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_oembed_time_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_elementor_screenshot":null,"_oembed_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_oembed_time_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_elementor_controls_usage":null,"_elementor_page_assets":[],"_elementor_screenshot_failed":null,"theplus_transient_widgets":null,"_eael_custom_js":null,"_wp_old_date":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_it_it":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_pt":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_zh_cn":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_nl_nl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_br":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sv_se":null,"rank_math_analytic_object_id":null,"rank_math_internal_links_processed":"1","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ro_ro":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sk_sk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_bg_bg":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sl_si":null,"litespeed_vpi_list":null,"litespeed_vpi_list_mobile":null,"rank_math_seo_score":null,"rank_math_contentai_score":null,"ilj_limitincominglinks":null,"ilj_maxincominglinks":null,"ilj_limitoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_maxoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_limitlinksperparagraph":null,"ilj_linksperparagraph":null,"ilj_blacklistdefinition":null,"ilj_linkdefinition":null,"_eb_reusable_block_ids":null,"rank_math_focus_keyword":"Server TCP","rank_math_og_content_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_content_score":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskeywords":null,"_yoast_wpseo_keywordsynonyms":null,"_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":null,"rank_math_description":null,"surfer_last_post_update":null,"surfer_last_post_update_direction":null,"surfer_keywords":null,"surfer_location":null,"surfer_draft_id":null,"surfer_permalink_hash":null,"surfer_scrape_ready":null,"_thumbnail_id":"19418","footnotes":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19425"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19425\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19418"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}