{"id":19737,"date":"2026-06-06T11:48:29","date_gmt":"2026-06-06T09:48:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/database-checkpointing-write-amplification-hosting-guide-scaling\/"},"modified":"2026-06-06T11:48:29","modified_gmt":"2026-06-06T09:48:29","slug":"database-checkpointing-write-amplification-hosting-guide-scaling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/database-checkpointing-write-amplification-hosting-guide-scaling\/","title":{"rendered":"Optimize database checkpointing and write amplification in hosting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Database checkpointing<\/strong> determines in hosting how quickly databases start after crashes, how evenly the write load progresses and how much write amplification stresses the SSDs. I will show you how to smooth out specific IO peaks and reduce costs through lower write volumes with sensible checkpoints, smart log settings and an adapted data model.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Key points<\/h2>\n\n<p>The following core aspects help me to specifically control database checkpointing and write amplification in hosting.<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Balance<\/strong> consciously choose between recovery time and write load<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Parameters<\/strong> Fine-tune for log, interval and dirty pages<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Indices<\/strong> reduce and promote batch writes<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Monitoring<\/strong> actively use for checkpoints and IO peaks<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Storage<\/strong> Select according to workloads<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h2>Basics briefly explained<\/h2>\n\n<p>Every database ultimately writes to <strong>Storage<\/strong>, but the way there is via buffers, caches and transaction logs. I know that not every app write ends up on the SSD immediately, because the buffer cache holds changed pages and only synchronizes them later. This decoupling protects <strong>IOPS<\/strong>, but can generate concentrated write waves at the wrong moment. This is precisely where checkpointing comes into play and determines when dirty pages are consistently moved to the data files. At file system level <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/server-file-system-journaling-data-consistency-hosting-redundant\/\">Journaling file systems<\/a> I also work on the backup process, which I take into account in my planning.<\/p>\n\n<h2>How checkpointing works in hosting<\/h2>\n\n<p>A <strong>Checkpoint<\/strong> writes changed pages to the data carrier in a controlled manner and marks a consistent state. During normal activity, log writing dominates, but at the checkpoint the balance tips heavily towards data files for a short time. This phase generates visible <strong>IO peaks<\/strong>, that reverberate on shared and VPS systems in particular. I quickly recognize these waves in metrics and assign them to a recurring plan. If the frequency does not match the workload, performance is wasted due to unnecessary writes and longer response times.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rechenzentrum-datenbank-4283.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Understanding write amplification<\/h2>\n\n<p>Write amplification describes additional <strong>Writes<\/strong>, that go beyond the actual app change. A single line change can affect the data file, transaction log and several indices, which increases the effective write volume. Metadata and journaling are added to the file system, and the SSD controller exacerbates the picture with garbage collection and wear leveling. So a small update quickly grows into a big one <strong>IO<\/strong>, which influences service life and latency. If you want to delve deeper into the phenomenon, you can find background information on the <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/ssd-write-amplification-hosting-storage-optimization-data-traffic\/\">SSD write amplification<\/a> directly in the hosting context.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Checkpoints as amplifiers of write load<\/h2>\n\n<p>Frequent <strong>checkpoints<\/strong> reduce the recovery time, but they bundle many dirty pages into short, powerful writes. This increases physical writes, including the side effects of file system journaling and SSD firmware. If I plan checkpoints too aggressively, latencies and the total number of writes increase, which reduces the recovery time. <strong>Service life<\/strong> of the SSD is reduced. If, on the other hand, I deploy them too infrequently, the transaction log inflates and prolongs the recovery time after a crash. I therefore balance the interval, log size and completion duration so that load peaks are flatter and the system runs smoothly.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/DatenbankOptimierung_Bild_4723.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Relevant adjusting screws per database<\/h2>\n\n<p>I control the behavior via four <strong>Lever<\/strong>Log size, interval, completion target and dirty page quota. Many systems trigger checkpoints when the log reaches a defined fill level, so I avoid segments that are too small. A clearly set time interval avoids random peaks, while the completion target stretches the duration and thus smoothes IO. At the same time, I keep an eye on the dirty page rate because a high rate triggers forced checkpoints. The following table classifies typical adjustment screws and their effect.<\/p>\n\n<table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th><strong>adjusting screw<\/strong><\/th>\n      <th><strong>Effect<\/strong><\/th>\n      <th><strong>Risk<\/strong><\/th>\n      <th><strong>Practical note<\/strong><\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Log size<\/td>\n      <td>Influences when checkpoints start up<\/td>\n      <td>Too small: frequent peaks<\/td>\n      <td>Select medium to large, keep an eye on recovery<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Checkpoint interval<\/td>\n      <td>Defines the basic cycle of the flushes<\/td>\n      <td>Too short: more write amplification<\/td>\n      <td>Adapt to workload and backup window<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Completion target<\/td>\n      <td>Distributes writes over time<\/td>\n      <td>Too long: Flush drags in high-load phases<\/td>\n      <td>Place on quiet phases, measure latencies<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Dirty page quota<\/td>\n      <td>Limits the risk of sudden forced flushes<\/td>\n      <td>Too low: unnecessary activity<\/td>\n      <td>Select so that the buffer works productively<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n<h2>Practical effects in everyday hosting<\/h2>\n\n<p>I often see short <strong>Dropout<\/strong> for websites that exactly match checkpoint phases. Forms then send noticeably slower, orders need that one crucial moment more. If backups are triggered at the same time, latencies increase twice as much because the database and backup process are fighting for the same resources. On shared platforms, a noisy system puts a strain on other customers, which I clearly separate in measurement curves. Only when these patterns become visible do I implement targeted changes to parameters and schedules.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Strategies for reducing write amplification<\/h2>\n\n<p>I start with the <strong>checkpoints<\/strong>Intervals moderate, completion target higher, log segments not too small. This way I distribute writes without unnecessarily prolonging the recovery. Next, I reduce the amount of data that each change affects by removing unnecessary <strong>Indices<\/strong> and align the remaining ones to real queries. Batch operations bundle updates, resulting in less metadata movement. Archiving moves cold data out of the active working set, reducing the number of pages affected per transaction.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/database-optimization-hosting-4721.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Making monitoring visible<\/h2>\n\n<p>Without measured values, I am <strong>IO<\/strong> in the dark, so I continuously monitor IOPS, throughput and IO wait. I use checkpoint statistics: duration, frequency, number of pages written and whether forced flushes occur. The buffer pool hit rate tells me whether the database is reading from disk too often and thus generating additional interference. If I combine external metrics and database views, I can recognize patterns quickly and reliably. Only then do I translate findings into concrete changes and check the result again.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Hosting selection with IO focus<\/h2>\n\n<p>I pay attention to <strong>NVMe<\/strong> or fast SSD systems, because low latencies cushion checkpoint peaks better. Assured IO resources give me planning security, especially for stores and SaaS backends. Configuration freedoms for logs, interval and dirty page quota are worth hard cash for data-intensive applications. For MySQL loads, the storage engine plays a major role, which is why I have to make the difference. <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/mysql-storage-engine-innodb-myisam-web-hosting-serverflux\/\">InnoDB vs. MyISAM<\/a> clearly evaluated. Transparent metrics in the panel help me to identify bottlenecks early on and to time tuning steps precisely.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/datenbank_optimierung_nacht1234.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Tuning the data model and the app<\/h2>\n\n<p>With the data model, I focus on <strong>Writing paths<\/strong> with the highest volume and remove indices with no clear benefit. Every additional index multiplies inserts and updates, so I check usage and cardinality regularly. I rely on batch inserts and bulk updates because they reduce log overhead and metadata work. I keep session data, caches and logs out of the main database and move them to systems that are better suited to them. I also choose sensible transaction limits, because extremely large or very many small transactions are unnecessarily costly.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Concrete storage tuning in hosting<\/h2>\n\n<p>For writing-intensive projects, I separate <strong>Logs<\/strong> and data files to different volumes in order to minimize competition. A clean queue depth and sufficient IOPS reserve ensure that checkpoints do not crowd out other tasks. Write caching can help a lot, but I always consider backup via UPS, controller battery or host guarantees. I arrange backup and maintenance schedules so that they don't clash with checkpoint phases. This keeps IO more consistent and eliminates expensive peaks.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/devdesk_database_opt_4082.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Time-based orchestration of workloads<\/h2>\n\n<p>I am planning <strong>Bulk jobs<\/strong> in quiet time windows so that checkpoints can unfold without competition. I carry out import waves, re-indexing and larger migrations in clear maintenance phases. If the windows are right, latency peaks are reduced because the storage has enough space for even flushes. I also synchronize cron jobs and backup start points to avoid collisions. This simple orchestration often brings fast, measurable effects without changing hardware.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Set realistic recovery goals<\/h2>\n\n<p>Realistic <strong>RTO<\/strong> and RPO decide how closely I clock checkpoints. If I want particularly short recovery times, I increase the frequency and log persistence to a reasonable extent. If I need consistent latencies above all, I stretch checkpoints and choose larger logs. Coordination with the backup strategy and replication remains important so that all the gears fit together. I explicitly document these goals so that later adjustments are based on clear guidelines.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Engine-specific adjusting screws in everyday life<\/h2>\n\n<p>Many basic principles are universal, but details differ depending on the engine. I therefore adapt the levers specifically:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li>PostgreSQL: <em>checkpoint_timeout<\/em> and <em>max_wal_size<\/em> determine how quickly WAL levels trigger checkpoints. With <em>checkpoint_completion_target<\/em> I distribute flushes over a larger proportion of the time. A WAL budget that is too small generates frequent, short peaks; one that is too large increases the recovery path and storage consumption. The <em>bgwriter<\/em> (Background Writer) also smoothes, provided its limits are not set too conservatively.<\/li>\n  <li>MySQL\/InnoDB: I pay attention to <em>innodb_log_file_size<\/em> or total redo size, <em>innodb_io_capacity(_max)<\/em> for the flush tempo and <em>innodb_max_dirty_pages_pct(_lazy)<\/em> to control the dirty rate. <em>innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit<\/em> influences durability vs. latency - I choose milder settings here with care and only with clean current protection.<\/li>\n  <li>SQL Server: Indirect checkpoints (target recovery time) smooth out flushes compared to the classic recovery interval. I set conservative targets for databases with a high proportion of OLTP and check whether TempDB and log volume separately offer enough performance so that checkpoints do not get in the way.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>They all have one thing in common: I define a sensible log size, limit dirty pages and tighten the throttle (flush rates) so that latencies remain stable under normal and peak loads.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Replication, PITR and backups in interaction<\/h2>\n\n<p>Replication paths and backups change the equation. Log-based replication (WAL\/Binlog\/Redo) benefits from larger log segments and even flushes because there is less fragmentation and overruns. Snapshot backups via the storage layer are practical, but create short-term pressure on caches and metadata; I place them in quiet phases and avoid overlaps with large checkpoints. If you use PITR, plan log retention consciously - too short a retention reduces costs, but can counteract recovery goals. If necessary, I throttle checkpoints on replicas to prioritize application reads without increasing the apply lags.<\/p>\n\n<h2>File system and OS tuning with a sense of proportion<\/h2>\n\n<p>Under the database, the operating system also decides. I check I\/O schedulers, mount options and kernel dirty settings:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li>A modern scheduler with low latency (e.g. MQ-based variants) helps to smooth out flush waves.<\/li>\n  <li>Mount options such as <em>noatime<\/em> reduce metadata writes; I select journaling modes in such a way that consistency and performance remain in balance.<\/li>\n  <li>Kernel parameters (<em>dirty_background_ratio<\/em>, <em>dirty_ratio<\/em>) must not interfere with the database's own rules. I avoid global forced flushes by setting them moderately.<\/li>\n  <li>I use Cgroups\/IO-Quotas in containers to isolate noisy neighbors and ensure predictable latencies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I test every change under real load, as overly aggressive system tweaks can quickly have side effects on crash recovery and data durability.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/server-optimierung-8716.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Diagnostic playbook and typical error patterns<\/h2>\n\n<p>When latencies increase, I work in a structured way:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li>Correlate metrics: Checkpoint duration, number of pages written, log fill levels, IOPS, queue depth, CPU waits. Peaks that begin with an increasing dirty rate and end with large flush series indicate intervals that are too narrow or logs that are too small.<\/li>\n  <li>Error images: Frequent forced checkpoints indicate hard dirty limits or overfilled logs. Increasing recovery times after restarts indicate checkpoints that are too rare or log segments that are too large without suitable completion targets.<\/li>\n  <li>Detect index ballast: High redo write rate for actually small app changes shows unnecessary secondary indexes or lines that are too wide.<\/li>\n  <li>Storage interference: If backups, compression or re-indexing place a load on the same volumes, I speak of resource collision - I resolve this in terms of time or by separating them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Only when the cause is clear do I change the parameters. In this way, I avoid shifting symptoms instead of solving them.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Test and rollout strategy for checkpoint tuning<\/h2>\n\n<p>I never change critical adjusting screws blindly. Instead:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li>Canary approach: A replica or staging environment receives the new values first.<\/li>\n  <li>Load profiles: I feed in realistic traffic patterns (peaks, batch windows, background jobs) to see the behavior of the checkpoints over an entire cycle.<\/li>\n  <li>Step-by-step adjustment: Small increments in log size, interval and completion target provide clear before\/after signals.<\/li>\n  <li>Rollback plan: I keep original values ready and document effects so that the team can optimize reproducibly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h2>Container and multi-tenant environments<\/h2>\n\n<p>In container operation and on shared hosts, I pay particular attention to isolation. Cgroup limits for IOPS\/throughput prevent individual services from displacing checkpoints of others. In orchestrations, I plan storage classes and volumes so that logs and data are distributed across suitable profiles (low latency vs. high throughput). Read replicas relieve mixed workloads if their checkpoints do not run at the same time as those of the primary system. In multi-tenant scenarios, I set hard limits for dirty pages per instance so that no client makes excessive use of the write budget.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Targeted operation of workload profiles<\/h2>\n\n<p>OLTP systems react sensitively to latency peaks. Here I stretch checkpoints significantly and keep logs large enough so that sporadic load surges do not immediately trigger a flush. In OLAP\/batch scenarios, I can flush more aggressively if peak times can be planned. Event ingestion benefits from batch writes and a moderate relaxation of the durability parameters if the infrastructure and UPS allow this. I separate mixed workloads - logically via queues and physically via volumes - so that their checkpoints do not overlap.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Pragmatically evaluate costs and SSD durability<\/h2>\n\n<p>I calculate write amplification against the TBW\/DWPD budget of the SSDs. If the daily write rate drops by a few percentage points, the service life is often noticeably extended. I track:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li>App writes vs. physical writes (derived from OS\/controller metrics)<\/li>\n  <li>Share of checkpoint writes in the total write rate<\/li>\n  <li>Capacity growth of logs and data files over time<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Smoothing checkpoints, streamlining indices and establishing batch paths not only saves IOPS, but also real hardware costs - without sacrificing features.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Runbooks and alarms<\/h2>\n\n<p>I set clear limits for when measures take effect:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li>Checkpoint duration regularly exceeds a defined portion of the interval (e.g. 60%)<\/li>\n  <li>Dirty page rate oscillates close to the forced trigger<\/li>\n  <li>IO-Wait or P99 latency increases in temporal proximity to checkpoints<\/li>\n  <li>Log levels repeatedly reach thresholds that trigger unwanted flushes<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I link alarms with runbook steps: equalize load, move backups, temporarily increase parameters until the actual correction (log size, completion target, index cleanup) is implemented.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Briefly summarized<\/h2>\n\n<p>I optimize <strong>database checkpointing<\/strong>, by balancing the interval, completion target, log size and dirty page quota. At the same time, I reduce write amplification with fewer indices, batch writes, outsourced sessions and clear schedules. Monitoring makes checkpoints, IO peaks and buffer behavior visible, allowing me to make targeted adjustments. The choice of hosting with a fast NVMe basis, guaranteed IO resources and sensible parameters closes the gaps. This enables me to achieve shorter response times, rapid recovery and lower costs due to fewer unnecessary writes.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Find out how you can increase the performance of your database and reduce costs with database checkpointing and less write amplification in hosting. Focus: database checkpointing.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":19730,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[781],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19737","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-datenbanken-administration-anleitungen"],"acf":[],"_wp_attached_file":null,"_wp_attachment_metadata":null,"litespeed-optimize-size":null,"litespeed-optimize-set":null,"_elementor_source_image_hash":null,"_wp_attachment_image_alt":null,"stockpack_author_name":null,"stockpack_author_url":null,"stockpack_provider":null,"stockpack_image_url":null,"stockpack_license":null,"stockpack_license_url":null,"stockpack_modification":null,"color":null,"original_id":null,"original_url":null,"original_link":null,"unsplash_location":null,"unsplash_sponsor":null,"unsplash_exif":null,"unsplash_attachment_metadata":null,"_elementor_is_screenshot":null,"surfer_file_name":null,"surfer_file_original_url":null,"envato_tk_source_kit":null,"envato_tk_source_index":null,"envato_tk_manifest":null,"envato_tk_folder_name":null,"envato_tk_builder":null,"envato_elements_download_event":null,"_menu_item_type":null,"_menu_item_menu_item_parent":null,"_menu_item_object_id":null,"_menu_item_object":null,"_menu_item_target":null,"_menu_item_classes":null,"_menu_item_xfn":null,"_menu_item_url":null,"_trp_menu_languages":null,"rank_math_primary_category":null,"rank_math_title":null,"inline_featured_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":null,"rank_math_schema_blogposting":null,"rank_math_schema_videoobject":null,"_oembed_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_oembed_time_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":null,"_yoast_wpseo_linkdex":null,"_oembed_27e3473bf8bec795fbeb3a9d38489348":null,"_oembed_c3b0f6959478faf92a1f343d8f96b19e":null,"_trp_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_desired_post_slug":null,"_yoast_wpseo_title":null,"tldname":null,"tldpreis":null,"tldrubrik":null,"tldpolicylink":null,"tldsize":null,"tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"tldtransfer":null,"tldwhoisprivacy":null,"tldregistrarchange":null,"tldregistrantchange":null,"tldwhoisupdate":null,"tldnameserverupdate":null,"tlddeletesofort":null,"tlddeleteexpire":null,"tldumlaute":null,"tldrestore":null,"tldsubcategory":null,"tldbildname":null,"tldbildurl":null,"tldclean":null,"tldcategory":null,"tldpolicy":null,"tldbesonderheiten":null,"tld_bedeutung":null,"_oembed_d167040d816d8f94c072940c8009f5f8":null,"_oembed_b0a0fa59ef14f8870da2c63f2027d064":null,"_oembed_4792fa4dfb2a8f09ab950a73b7f313ba":null,"_oembed_33ceb1fe54a8ab775d9410abf699878d":null,"_oembed_fd7014d14d919b45ec004937c0db9335":null,"_oembed_21a029d076783ec3e8042698c351bd7e":null,"_oembed_be5ea8a0c7b18e658f08cc571a909452":null,"_oembed_a9ca7a298b19f9b48ec5914e010294d2":null,"_oembed_f8db6b27d08a2bb1f920e7647808899a":null,"_oembed_168ebde5096e77d8a89326519af9e022":null,"_oembed_cdb76f1b345b42743edfe25481b6f98f":null,"_oembed_87b0613611ae54e86e8864265404b0a1":null,"_oembed_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_oembed_time_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_tldname":null,"_tldclean":null,"_tldpreis":null,"_tldcategory":null,"_tldsubcategory":null,"_tldpolicy":null,"_tldpolicylink":null,"_tldsize":null,"_tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"_tldtransfer":null,"_tldwhoisprivacy":null,"_tldregistrarchange":null,"_tldregistrantchange":null,"_tldwhoisupdate":null,"_tldnameserverupdate":null,"_tlddeletesofort":null,"_tlddeleteexpire":null,"_tldumlaute":null,"_tldrestore":null,"_tldbildname":null,"_tldbildurl":null,"_tld_bedeutung":null,"_tldbesonderheiten":null,"_oembed_ad96e4112edb9f8ffa35731d4098bc6b":null,"_oembed_8357e2b8a2575c74ed5978f262a10126":null,"_oembed_3d5fea5103dd0d22ec5d6a33eff7f863":null,"_eael_widget_elements":null,"_oembed_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_oembed_time_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_aioseo_description":null,"_eb_attr":null,"_eb_data_table":null,"_oembed_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_oembed_time_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_acf_changed":null,"_wpcode_auto_insert":null,"_edit_last":null,"_edit_lock":null,"_oembed_e7b913c6c84084ed9702cb4feb012ddd":null,"_oembed_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_time_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"_oembed_time_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"rank_math_news_sitemap_robots":null,"rank_math_robots":null,"_eael_post_view_count":"124","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ru_ru":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_et":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lv":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fr_fr":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_old_slug":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_da_dk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pl_pl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_es_es":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_hu_hu":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fi":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ja":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lt_lt":null,"_elementor_edit_mode":null,"_elementor_template_type":null,"_elementor_version":null,"_elementor_pro_version":null,"_wp_page_template":null,"_elementor_page_settings":null,"_elementor_data":null,"_elementor_css":null,"_elementor_conditions":null,"_happyaddons_elements_cache":null,"_oembed_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_time_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_time_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_time_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_time_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_oembed_time_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_elementor_screenshot":null,"_oembed_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_oembed_time_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_elementor_controls_usage":null,"_elementor_page_assets":[],"_elementor_screenshot_failed":null,"theplus_transient_widgets":null,"_eael_custom_js":null,"_wp_old_date":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_it_it":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_pt":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_zh_cn":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_nl_nl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_br":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sv_se":null,"rank_math_analytic_object_id":null,"rank_math_internal_links_processed":"1","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ro_ro":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sk_sk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_bg_bg":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sl_si":null,"litespeed_vpi_list":null,"litespeed_vpi_list_mobile":null,"rank_math_seo_score":null,"rank_math_contentai_score":null,"ilj_limitincominglinks":null,"ilj_maxincominglinks":null,"ilj_limitoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_maxoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_limitlinksperparagraph":null,"ilj_linksperparagraph":null,"ilj_blacklistdefinition":null,"ilj_linkdefinition":null,"_eb_reusable_block_ids":null,"rank_math_focus_keyword":"database checkpointing","rank_math_og_content_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_content_score":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskeywords":null,"_yoast_wpseo_keywordsynonyms":null,"_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":null,"rank_math_description":null,"surfer_last_post_update":null,"surfer_last_post_update_direction":null,"surfer_keywords":null,"surfer_location":null,"surfer_draft_id":null,"surfer_permalink_hash":null,"surfer_scrape_ready":null,"_thumbnail_id":"19730","footnotes":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19737","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19737"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19737\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19730"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19737"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19737"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19737"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}