{"id":19833,"date":"2026-06-09T11:55:53","date_gmt":"2026-06-09T09:55:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/http-persistent-connections-webserver-auslastung-performance-netzwerk\/"},"modified":"2026-06-09T11:55:53","modified_gmt":"2026-06-09T09:55:53","slug":"http-persistent-connections-web-server-load-performance-network","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/http-persistent-connections-webserver-auslastung-performance-netzwerk\/","title":{"rendered":"HTTP Persistent Connections and web server load in modern web hosting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>HTTP Persistent Connections bundle handshakes, save round trips and have a measurable impact on the utilization of web servers. <strong>HTTP Connections<\/strong> consciously controls, lowers <strong>Latency<\/strong> and CPU requirements. In this text, I show in a practical way how permanent connections influence the capacity of hosts, resource consumption and the architecture of modern hosting setups.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Key points<\/h2>\n\n<p>I summarize the most important levers and locate them between performance, load control and security before going into more detail. I use these points as a common thread for configuring, testing and monitoring a high-performance hosting environment. I consistently relate each statement to concrete effects on <strong>Web server<\/strong> and user experience. This results in a clear prioritization for meaningful adjustments. I then delve deeper into implementation and maintenance in day-to-day operations with practical recommendations and robust <strong>Guide values<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Keep-Alive<\/strong> reduces handshakes, lowers latency and saves CPU.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Resource commitment<\/strong> increases if many connections remain open for a long time.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Multiplexing<\/strong> in HTTP\/2\/3 significantly reduces the number of connections per client.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Timeouts<\/strong> and limits balance speed, memory and safety.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Monitoring<\/strong> uncovers bottlenecks and misconfigurations at an early stage.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p>I use these key points to make decisions measurable and avoid side effects. This allows me to maintain a balance between short loading times, fair use of resources and controlled <strong>Utilization<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rechenzentrum-webserver-4823.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>HTTP Persistent Connections: How they work in hosting<\/h2>\n\n<p>A persistent connection keeps the TCP channel open across multiple requests so that browsers can request HTML, CSS, JavaScript and images one after the other via the same line; this saves me having to repeat the process for each asset. <strong>Handshake<\/strong>. In HTTP\/1.1, the connection remains active by default until the client or server closes it via header or timeout. This reduces round trips, reduces queues and noticeably improves the time to first byte after the first document. Algorithms such as TCP Slow Start also benefit because a longer-running connection utilizes its window more efficiently. This reduces the perceived <strong>waiting time<\/strong>, especially for pages with many assets.<\/p>\n\n<p>In practice, I differentiate between short-lived page views and sessions with many interactions, for example in dashboards or single-page applications. This shows that reusing connections not only saves bandwidth, but also avoids context switches in worker processes. If a line remains active, there are fewer kernel operations for socket establishment and removal. This saves CPU cycles, which is noticeable with a high number of users. Persistent connections therefore form the technical lever for faster responses and a more efficient <strong>Use<\/strong> the hardware.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Advantages for loading time and CPU load<\/h2>\n\n<p>I measure the advantages of persistent connections primarily via latency, server CPU and number of new sessions per time unit. Each avoided handshake saves cryptographic negotiation in TLS and reduces context switching, which has a direct impact under load. Connection reuse also reduces the number of competing connections per client, which reduces lock retention and buffer pressure. The page loads more smoothly because subsequent assets flow without additional setup. This results in shorter response times and a smoother <strong>Scaling<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p>I see the effect being particularly pronounced on media-rich pages, stores or headless front-ends with many API calls per session. The more consistently a connection is used, the better the effect of caches at transport level. At the same time, control remains important, as overly generous settings tie up resources. I therefore combine clean front-end asset management with a focused keep-alive strategy. This allows me to achieve short loading times and save <strong>CPU<\/strong>-time.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/konferenz_http_webhosting_4321.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Influence on the web server load<\/h2>\n\n<p>Persistent connections change the load profile: fewer but longer sessions are created, which permanently occupy memory, file descriptors and possibly threads or workers. This results in a balancing act between a low connection flood and higher binding per socket. In addition to CPU and bandwidth, I therefore also monitor the number of open connections, their duration and their activity in monitoring tools. If many lines are held without transferring data, the server reaches its limits even though the CPU is still free. I can counteract this with timeouts, per-IP limits and targeted <strong>Queueing<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p>In practice, structured performance profiling helps me. I start with conservative timeouts, increase them gradually and check whether the effect on latency and TTFB decreases. At the latest when the number of inactive sockets grows disproportionately, I pull back the limit. If you want to delve deeper, you can find a compact guide at <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/keep-alive-web-server-performance-tuning-guide\/\">Keep-Alive Tuning<\/a>. This way, I keep the number of active connections in the green range and ensure a consistent <strong>Utilization<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>HTTP\/1.1, chunked encoding and bandwidth control<\/h2>\n\n<p>In addition to persistent connections, HTTP\/1.1 also introduced chunked transfer encoding, whereby the server sends content in sections. This is well suited to dynamic applications that want to deliver parts of a response early. The client clearly recognizes when a chunk ends and when the response is complete without closing the connection. This allows long calculations to be concealed and the browser can render content quickly. In addition, I deliberately regulate data throughput in order to save server and network buffers. <strong>to utilize<\/strong>, instead of driving over them.<\/p>\n\n<p>Properly dosed, chunking reduces backpressure and makes responses more predictable. The server controls the size of the chunks while keeping the connection open. This means that further requests from the client remain possible without creating new lines. In combination with Keep-Alive, I avoid idle time and build up continuous data streams. This approach saves round trips, keeps response chains short and reduces unnecessary <strong>Tips<\/strong> in the load.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Risks: Resource commitment and DoS potential<\/h2>\n\n<p>Every open connection costs memory and possibly a worker slot, even if no user data is currently flowing. If clients hoard countless inactive sockets, the throughput collapses even though the CPU and bandwidth are not at their limit. This is exactly what attackers use with slow Loris or low-and-slow approaches by keeping many connections open and hardly sending any data. I therefore limit the maximum number of simultaneous connections per IP and set tight but fair timeouts. In this way, I preserve the benefits of persistent lines and reduce the <strong>Risk<\/strong> of exhaustion attacks.<\/p>\n\n<p>In productive setups, I test borderline cases with synthetic load. I check how many connections the system can hold before latencies tip over. I observe when kernel descriptors become scarce and how quickly workers become free again. I then adjust limits so that legitimate users are served quickly, while abuse is slowed down. This keeps the service responsive and protects important <strong>Resources<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/webserver-load-http-connections-8574.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Optimal keep-alive configuration: timeouts, limits, balance<\/h2>\n\n<p>I start with moderate keep-alive timeouts, increase in small steps and measure TTFB, response time under load and number of new sessions per second. At the same time, I limit requests per connection so that individual sockets do not block for too long. A limit per IP also helps to throttle outliers. I keep these three levers in line until further extensions to the connection duration no longer bring any benefit. Then I fix the values and document the <strong>Thresholds<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p>For detailed fine-tuning, I use tried-and-tested procedures and back myself up with load tests. If you want to optimize in a structured way, you can find <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/http-connection-reuse-keepalive-optimization-serverperf-boost\/\">Connection Reuse<\/a> a helpful in-depth look at measurement points and tuning sequences. It remains important not to evaluate effects in isolation: a shorter timeout, for example, can reduce CPU load but increase latencies for subsequent assets. That's why I always evaluate key figures together. In this way, the configuration remains reproducible and reliably contributes to shorter <strong>Response times<\/strong> with.<\/p>\n\n<h2>HTTP\/2 and HTTP\/3: Understanding multiplexing<\/h2>\n\n<p>With HTTP\/2 and HTTP\/3, the optimization shifts: a single, longer-running connection per client transports many streams in parallel. Multiplexing reduces head-of-line blocking at protocol level and eliminates the need for many parallel TCP connections. This significantly reduces overhead and simplifies server control. At the same time, the requirements for buffer and stream management increase because more work takes place per socket. I therefore specifically check how well the server prioritizes streams and how quickly it can handle blockages. <strong>dissolves<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p>The following table summarizes the differences and provides guide values for practical use. Values are deliberately ranges because traffic patterns, CPU and network vary. This orientation helps to find the balance for each setup. If you would like to read the basics and background information on the procedure, start here: <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/http2-multiplexing-vs-http11-performance-background-optimization\/\">HTTP\/2 multiplexing<\/a>. I am thus laying the foundation for the efficient use of modern protocols in the <strong>Hosting<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th>Protocol<\/th>\n      <th>Connections per client (typical)<\/th>\n      <th>Multiplexing<\/th>\n      <th>Head-of-line blocking<\/th>\n      <th>Keep-alive timeout (guide value)<\/th>\n      <th>Effect on load profile<\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td>HTTP\/1.1<\/td>\n      <td>4-8<\/td>\n      <td>No<\/td>\n      <td>Often at HTTP level<\/td>\n      <td>5\u201315 s<\/td>\n      <td>Many connections, mixed duration<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>HTTP\/2<\/td>\n      <td>1-2<\/td>\n      <td>Yes<\/td>\n      <td>Significantly reduced<\/td>\n      <td>15-60 s<\/td>\n      <td>Few, heavily used connections<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>HTTP\/3 (QUIC)<\/td>\n      <td>1<\/td>\n      <td>Yes<\/td>\n      <td>Hardly relevant<\/td>\n      <td>15-60 s<\/td>\n      <td>Very long, high-performance sessions<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/webserver_auslastung_3452.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Web hosting effects and tariff selection<\/h2>\n\n<p>Good handling of persistent connections reduces hardware requirements per visitor and increases throughput per host. For operators, this means that the same hardware can support more simultaneous users without increasing response times. Hosting providers also benefit because they can increase density per server without reducing service quality. For projects with WordPress, stores or dashboards, this pays off in shorter loading times and better SEO signals. That's why I pay attention to protocol support, clean keep-alive profiles and high-performance <strong>Web server<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<p>Transparent information on HTTP\/2, HTTP\/3, caching and reverse proxy setups makes decisions easier. Providing clear limits and metrics makes capacity planning easier. I also check whether log and metrics access is included in order to verify my own optimizations. A provider with modern infrastructure significantly reduces the risk of unexpected bottlenecks. This ensures short distances from the measuring point to the <strong>Measure<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Practice: Settings in Apache, Nginx and LiteSpeed<\/h2>\n\n<p>I set three things in everyday life: Activation of Keep-Alive, reasonable timeouts and resource limits for workers and connections. In Apache, MPM modules, MaxKeepAliveRequests and KeepAliveTimeout influence the behavior. In Nginx, worker_processes, worker_connections and keepalive_timeout interact. LiteSpeed implements similar parameters with its own terminology. It remains crucial to consider limits uniformly at server and app level so that no unwanted <strong>bottleneck<\/strong> arises.<\/p>\n\n<p>I adjust values gradually, test reproducibly and validate with measuring points. I only transfer settings to the standard configuration when key figures appear robust. I have rollback plans ready in case load profiles change or traffic patterns change. In this way, I avoid trial and error in live operation. Documentation saves time later on and reduces the risk of contradictory <strong>Parameters<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/entwickler_desk_http_3457.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Best practices for developers and operators<\/h2>\n\n<p>On the application side, I reduce requests by bundling and minifying assets and implementing versioning cleanly. Browser caching via cache control, ETag and sensible expiry times reduces repeated requests. With HTTP\/2\/3, I prioritize important resources instead of just merging everything. For TLS, I use current protocols and cipher combinations to keep handshakes efficient. Taken together, this supports a lean transport route and saves <strong>CPU<\/strong>-time.<\/p>\n\n<p>I optimize Keep-Alive particularly finely for APIs: many short calls per session benefit greatly from reusing the line. At the same time, I slow down inactivity that lasts too long so that resources are not wasted. I also check header sizes because large cookies and header lists place an unnecessary load on streams. Clean format reduces overhead, improves parsing and strengthens the <strong>Responsiveness<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/hosting-servers-9247.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Reading monitoring and key figures correctly<\/h2>\n\n<p>I monitor four key parameters: active connections, average connection duration, ratio of new to reused sessions and response times under load. If the number of new sessions jumps up, there is usually no connection reuse or the timeout is too short. If inactive sockets grow, the timeout or per-IP limit will be too generous or an attack is underway. I correlate metrics with log data to identify patterns and peak times. From this I derive concrete <strong>Adjustments<\/strong> from.<\/p>\n\n<p>It remains important to repeat measurements in phases, for example at peak times and at night. I introduce changes separately so that effects remain measurable. I check again at the latest when there are shifts in traffic or new features. In this way, I keep configuration and reality congruent. The effect is predictable response times and a calculable <strong>Capacity<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Outlook for HTTP\/3 and QUIC<\/h2>\n\n<p>HTTP\/3 uses QUIC via UDP and saves additional round trips in the handshake, especially in mobile networks. Multiplexing remains, head-of-line on the transport layer is eliminated and connection migration makes connection drops less frequent. This measurably increases resilience to packet loss and radio changes. For servers, this means serving few but very productive connections per client. I am planning generous but controlled <strong>Timeouts<\/strong> and ensure reliable stream management.<\/p>\n\n<p>If you optimize cleanly on HTTP\/2 today, it will be easier to switch to HTTP\/3 later. Tests with real clients and load profiles remain indispensable. I use hard data exchange with monitoring tools to prove successes and fine-tune details. In the long term, the work on connection reuse pays off in shorter loading times and better performance. <strong>User experience<\/strong> from.<\/p>\n\n<h2>TLS 1.3 and session resumption: Push handshakes further<\/h2>\n\n<p>In addition to keep-alive, I reduce handshake overhead via TLS 1.3 and session resumption. Tickets or session IDs allow follow-up connections to be started without complete negotiation; this noticeably reduces CPU costs. In measurements, I pay attention to the rate of resumed handshakes and the number of complete handshakes per second. 0-RTT can save additional round trips, but is only useful for idempotent GETs because replays are possible. I therefore activate 0-RTT selectively and check whether my web server has protection mechanisms and clear path rules for this. Together with connection reuse, this results in short paths from the first byte to the visible content.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Proxy chains and idle timeout alignment<\/h2>\n\n<p>In real setups, there is often a CDN, WAF, load balancer and reverse proxy between the client and app. Each level has its own <strong>Idle timeouts<\/strong> and limits. I match values along the chain: If the CDN timeout is shorter than that of the origin, connections break prematurely, which triggers 499\/502 errors and unnecessary rebuilds. Equally important are keep-alive pools for upstream (e.g. Nginx proxying, Apache balancer): Pools that are too small create connect storms, pools that are too large tie up descriptors. I therefore measure the connection duration, pool hit rate and idle time per hop and smooth out timeouts so that no stage becomes a bottleneck.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Operating system and kernel tuning without confusion<\/h2>\n\n<p>HTTP keep-alive is not the same as TCP keep-alive. The latter sends low-level probes to detect dead peers; this helps with firewalls, but does not replace HTTP timeouts. At OS level, I increase file descriptors (ulimit -n), adjust backlogs (somaxconn, tcp_max_syn_backlog) and keep the port range wide so that outgoing connections (e.g. to upstreams) do not fail due to the ephemeral port limit. I evaluate TIME_WAIT load carefully: Shortened FIN timeouts can help, but I avoid aggressive tweaks that reduce stability or security. The goal is a system that can handle many <strong>Simultaneous connections<\/strong> managed cleanly without running into kernel bottlenecks.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Correctly classify prioritization, header compression and server push<\/h2>\n\n<p>Prioritization plays a major role with HTTP\/2\/3. I test whether the server sets sensible standards and respects browser priorities. In practice, I do well with a clear weighting of critical assets (HTML, CSS via JS and images). At the same time, I pay attention to the costs of HPACK\/QPACK: the dynamic tables save bytes, but cost CPU and memory per connection. I choose a moderate table size and keep headers, especially cookies, lean. I use server push sparingly or not at all: If pushed incorrectly, it blocks bandwidth and counteracts <strong>Multiplexing<\/strong>. Instead, I rely on prioritization and preload hints from the application.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Special cases: WebSockets, SSE and gRPC<\/h2>\n\n<p>WebSockets and server-sent events are <strong>long running<\/strong> Channels. I separate their pools and limits from classic HTTP requests so that a few chats or dashboards do not tie up all the workers. I set idle timeouts higher, but with heartbeat mechanisms so that dead lines are detected. gRPC relies on HTTP\/2 and benefits from persistent connection and flow control; here I monitor window sizes, message limits and the number of streams to avoid latency peaks and backpressure. In all cases, the following applies: long-runners must not clog up the request path - separate listeners or upstream pools keep the rest responsive.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Test playbook and troubleshooting in everyday life<\/h2>\n\n<p>For reproducible results, I follow a fixed procedure: First measure synthetic baseline (cold\/warm), then successively vary timeouts and limits and record TTFB, P95\/99 latencies, new connections per second, TLS handshakes\/second and reuse rate per step. Tools with HTTP\/2\/3 support and a realistic concurrency profile help, as do browser traces from the target group (mobile\/WLAN). If 408\/499 occurs frequently, the idle timeout is usually too short. If 502\/504 accumulate at the proxy, the timeout chain is not correct. If I see high CPU shares in cryptography, resumption or modern ciphers are missing. If RSS memory grows linearly with connections, header tables, buffers or worker slots are too large.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Capacity planning: calculating instead of guessing<\/h2>\n\n<p>I plan connection budgets with simple approximations: Concurrent connections \u2248 requests\/second \u00d7 average request duration \u00d7 security allowance. For HTTP\/2\/3, I also include the average number of streams. For each connection, I calculate memory for the socket, buffer and log data (header tables, TLS contexts). This gives a solid picture of how many <strong>Simultaneous users<\/strong> a host can carry before latencies tip over. With process-based stacks (e.g. PHP-FPM), I keep worker pools in such a way that they serve the expected parallelism without generating thrashing; with event loop servers, I pay attention to NIC and IRQ distribution as well as fair rate limits so that individual clients do not block the event loop.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Fairness, back pressure and safety screws<\/h2>\n\n<p>To prevent persistent connections from becoming a one-way street, I combine them with fair queues: Limits per IP\/client, request burst quotas and clean read\/write timeouts. Tight header and body timeouts, minimum throughput rules and small but clear header limits help against low-and-slow attacks. I dimension write buffers so that slow recipients do not slow down the server; if necessary, I cut connections if there is hardly any progress over a longer period of time. The aim is to utilize the advantages of open lines, without the <strong>Stability<\/strong> to sacrifice.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Operational hygiene: rolling out changes safely<\/h2>\n\n<p>I roll out every change to keep-alive or multiplexing in stages: first staging, then a small percentage of traffic, and finally completely. I document start values, target values and expected effects and check the metrics against the hypothesis after deployment. If reality drifts, I automatically roll back. This discipline keeps configuration and monitoring in sync and ensures that improvements continue instead of just shining in benchmarks.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Summary: What counts for hosting performance<\/h2>\n\n<p>Persistent connections shorten paths, save handshakes and reduce CPU load, while multiplexing greatly reduces the number of connections per client. The art lies in timeouts, limits and fair resource allocation so that connections bring benefits without blocking the server. I combine server-side tuning with asset hygiene and consistent caching to reduce real loading times. Monitoring provides the factual basis for adjustments and keeps configuration and traffic in balance. If you use HTTP\/2\/3 wisely and set up keep-alive in a targeted manner, you will achieve a noticeably faster, more reliable loading time. <strong>Delivery<\/strong> of contents.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Learn how HTTP Persistent Connections affect web server load and why the principle is crucial for hosting optimization with a focus on performance.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":19826,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[834],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19833","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-plesk-webserver-plesk-administration-anleitungen"],"acf":[],"_wp_attached_file":null,"_wp_attachment_metadata":null,"litespeed-optimize-size":null,"litespeed-optimize-set":null,"_elementor_source_image_hash":null,"_wp_attachment_image_alt":null,"stockpack_author_name":null,"stockpack_author_url":null,"stockpack_provider":null,"stockpack_image_url":null,"stockpack_license":null,"stockpack_license_url":null,"stockpack_modification":null,"color":null,"original_id":null,"original_url":null,"original_link":null,"unsplash_location":null,"unsplash_sponsor":null,"unsplash_exif":null,"unsplash_attachment_metadata":null,"_elementor_is_screenshot":null,"surfer_file_name":null,"surfer_file_original_url":null,"envato_tk_source_kit":null,"envato_tk_source_index":null,"envato_tk_manifest":null,"envato_tk_folder_name":null,"envato_tk_builder":null,"envato_elements_download_event":null,"_menu_item_type":null,"_menu_item_menu_item_parent":null,"_menu_item_object_id":null,"_menu_item_object":null,"_menu_item_target":null,"_menu_item_classes":null,"_menu_item_xfn":null,"_menu_item_url":null,"_trp_menu_languages":null,"rank_math_primary_category":null,"rank_math_title":null,"inline_featured_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":null,"rank_math_schema_blogposting":null,"rank_math_schema_videoobject":null,"_oembed_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_oembed_time_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":null,"_yoast_wpseo_linkdex":null,"_oembed_27e3473bf8bec795fbeb3a9d38489348":null,"_oembed_c3b0f6959478faf92a1f343d8f96b19e":null,"_trp_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_desired_post_slug":null,"_yoast_wpseo_title":null,"tldname":null,"tldpreis":null,"tldrubrik":null,"tldpolicylink":null,"tldsize":null,"tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"tldtransfer":null,"tldwhoisprivacy":null,"tldregistrarchange":null,"tldregistrantchange":null,"tldwhoisupdate":null,"tldnameserverupdate":null,"tlddeletesofort":null,"tlddeleteexpire":null,"tldumlaute":null,"tldrestore":null,"tldsubcategory":null,"tldbildname":null,"tldbildurl":null,"tldclean":null,"tldcategory":null,"tldpolicy":null,"tldbesonderheiten":null,"tld_bedeutung":null,"_oembed_d167040d816d8f94c072940c8009f5f8":null,"_oembed_b0a0fa59ef14f8870da2c63f2027d064":null,"_oembed_4792fa4dfb2a8f09ab950a73b7f313ba":null,"_oembed_33ceb1fe54a8ab775d9410abf699878d":null,"_oembed_fd7014d14d919b45ec004937c0db9335":null,"_oembed_21a029d076783ec3e8042698c351bd7e":null,"_oembed_be5ea8a0c7b18e658f08cc571a909452":null,"_oembed_a9ca7a298b19f9b48ec5914e010294d2":null,"_oembed_f8db6b27d08a2bb1f920e7647808899a":null,"_oembed_168ebde5096e77d8a89326519af9e022":null,"_oembed_cdb76f1b345b42743edfe25481b6f98f":null,"_oembed_87b0613611ae54e86e8864265404b0a1":null,"_oembed_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_oembed_time_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_tldname":null,"_tldclean":null,"_tldpreis":null,"_tldcategory":null,"_tldsubcategory":null,"_tldpolicy":null,"_tldpolicylink":null,"_tldsize":null,"_tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"_tldtransfer":null,"_tldwhoisprivacy":null,"_tldregistrarchange":null,"_tldregistrantchange":null,"_tldwhoisupdate":null,"_tldnameserverupdate":null,"_tlddeletesofort":null,"_tlddeleteexpire":null,"_tldumlaute":null,"_tldrestore":null,"_tldbildname":null,"_tldbildurl":null,"_tld_bedeutung":null,"_tldbesonderheiten":null,"_oembed_ad96e4112edb9f8ffa35731d4098bc6b":null,"_oembed_8357e2b8a2575c74ed5978f262a10126":null,"_oembed_3d5fea5103dd0d22ec5d6a33eff7f863":null,"_eael_widget_elements":null,"_oembed_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_oembed_time_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_aioseo_description":null,"_eb_attr":null,"_eb_data_table":null,"_oembed_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_oembed_time_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_acf_changed":null,"_wpcode_auto_insert":null,"_edit_last":null,"_edit_lock":null,"_oembed_e7b913c6c84084ed9702cb4feb012ddd":null,"_oembed_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_time_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"_oembed_time_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"rank_math_news_sitemap_robots":null,"rank_math_robots":null,"_eael_post_view_count":"109","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ru_ru":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_et":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lv":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fr_fr":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_old_slug":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_da_dk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pl_pl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_es_es":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_hu_hu":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fi":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ja":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lt_lt":null,"_elementor_edit_mode":null,"_elementor_template_type":null,"_elementor_version":null,"_elementor_pro_version":null,"_wp_page_template":null,"_elementor_page_settings":null,"_elementor_data":null,"_elementor_css":null,"_elementor_conditions":null,"_happyaddons_elements_cache":null,"_oembed_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_time_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_time_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_time_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_time_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_oembed_time_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_elementor_screenshot":null,"_oembed_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_oembed_time_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_elementor_controls_usage":null,"_elementor_page_assets":[],"_elementor_screenshot_failed":null,"theplus_transient_widgets":null,"_eael_custom_js":null,"_wp_old_date":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_it_it":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_pt":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_zh_cn":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_nl_nl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_br":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sv_se":null,"rank_math_analytic_object_id":null,"rank_math_internal_links_processed":"1","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ro_ro":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sk_sk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_bg_bg":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sl_si":null,"litespeed_vpi_list":null,"litespeed_vpi_list_mobile":null,"rank_math_seo_score":null,"rank_math_contentai_score":null,"ilj_limitincominglinks":null,"ilj_maxincominglinks":null,"ilj_limitoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_maxoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_limitlinksperparagraph":null,"ilj_linksperparagraph":null,"ilj_blacklistdefinition":null,"ilj_linkdefinition":null,"_eb_reusable_block_ids":null,"rank_math_focus_keyword":"HTTP Connections","rank_math_og_content_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_content_score":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskeywords":null,"_yoast_wpseo_keywordsynonyms":null,"_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":null,"rank_math_description":null,"surfer_last_post_update":null,"surfer_last_post_update_direction":null,"surfer_keywords":null,"surfer_location":null,"surfer_draft_id":null,"surfer_permalink_hash":null,"surfer_scrape_ready":null,"_thumbnail_id":"19826","footnotes":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19833","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19833"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19833\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19833"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19833"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19833"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}