{"id":20076,"date":"2026-07-27T18:35:51","date_gmt":"2026-07-27T16:35:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/copy-fail-vulnerability-shared-hosting-kernel-exploit-sicherheit\/"},"modified":"2026-07-27T18:35:51","modified_gmt":"2026-07-27T16:35:51","slug":"copy-fail-vulnerability-shared-hosting-kernel-exploit-security","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/copy-fail-vulnerability-shared-hosting-kernel-exploit-sicherheit\/","title":{"rendered":"Copy-Fail Vulnerability \u2013 Risks for Shared Hosting Platforms"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Vulnerability <strong>Copy Failed<\/strong> (CVE-2026-31431) poses an immediate threat to shared hosting servers because a local user can gain root privileges in seconds. For multi-tenant environments, this brings the <strong>Insulation<\/strong> between accounts as soon as a single account is compromised.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Key points<\/h2>\n\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Local Escalation<\/strong>: An unprivileged user forces a controlled write to the page cache.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Shared Kernel<\/strong>: One host, many customers\u2014one exploit, full control.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Setuid Target<\/strong>: Tampered binaries can quickly grant root privileges.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Mandatory Patch<\/strong>: Kernel fix requiring a reboot; temporary protection via blacklisting\/Seccomp.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Hosting Risks<\/strong>: Container escape, data leakage, website manipulation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h2>Why \"Copy Fail\" Affects Shared Hosting in Particular<\/h2>\n\n<p>On traditional shared-hosting servers, many customers share the same <strong>Kernel<\/strong>, which means that a local privilege escalation has an immediate impact on the platform. A stolen login, a weak password, or a planted webshell is all it takes to launch the exploit on the host and <strong>Clients<\/strong> to proceed. Isolation mechanisms such as chroot or simple containers lose their effectiveness as soon as the attacker gains access to the kernel space. This is exactly what Copy Fail enables by forcing controlled write access to the page cache of readable files. Anyone relying on strong <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/shared-hosting-security-tenant-isolation-serverguard\/\">Tenant insulation<\/a> While this does slow the spread, the risk remains significant without a patched kernel.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Technical Background and Exploit Mechanics<\/h2>\n\n<p>The gap lies in the <strong>algif_aead<\/strong>-module of the AF_ALG interface, which makes cryptographic operations available via sockets. A logic error in conjunction with splice() allows a targeted four-byte write operation to the <strong>Page Cache<\/strong> any readable files, including setuid binaries. Attackers manipulate a small portion of a cached binary file, execute it, and then gain a root shell. In tests, a compact proof-of-concept consisting of approximately 732 bytes of Python code was sufficient to trigger full privilege escalation. The vulnerability is local in nature, but its impact is global, affecting the entire host.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hosting-risiken-4517.png\" alt=\"Risks of Copy Fail for Shared Hosting Platforms\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Affected Distributions and Fix Status<\/h2>\n\n<p>Copy Fail affects many <strong>Distributions<\/strong>, which have implemented kernel optimizations in the algif_aead path since 2017. These include popular server platforms such as Ubuntu LTS, Debian, RHEL derivatives, SUSE\/openSUSE, Amazon Linux, AlmaLinux, and Fedora. The key fix is the kernel commit <strong>a664bf3d603d<\/strong>, which rejects the faulty optimization. Administrators must install the appropriate kernel packages, then reboot the system and verify the active version. Without a reboot, the old kernel remains active, leaving the host vulnerable.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Specific Risks for Hosting Providers<\/h2>\n\n<p>After a successful escalation with <strong>Copy Failed<\/strong> The host is exposed, including databases, configurations, and backups. An attacker can swap out files in customer accounts, establish persistent access, and set up stealthy code injections. In container environments with a shared kernel, a container escape can quickly lead to host access with <strong>Root<\/strong>-Privileges. Systems with many interactive users, CI\/CD runners, or scripts that regularly execute third-party code are particularly at risk. Every additional execution source increases the likelihood that someone will gain local access to the kernel.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/copy-fail-vulnerability-0283.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Distinction: Shared Kernel vs. Hardened Architectures<\/h2>\n\n<p>Better insulation reduces the platform effect and replaces the <strong>Patch<\/strong> But that's not the case. MicroVM runtimes like Firecracker or Cloud Hypervisor isolate workloads using hardware virtualization, which means that local kernel escalations in the guest have less impact on the host. gVisor-style sandboxing makes system calls more difficult, while strict Seccomp profiles <strong>AF_ALG<\/strong>-Completely block access. Such measures reduce the attack surface, especially for untrusted workloads. Regardless, an unpatched host remains the weakest link.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Immediate Actions: What I'm Doing Today<\/h2>\n\n<p>First, I'll prioritize conducting a comprehensive inventory of all <strong>Kernel<\/strong>-status and roles of the affected servers. After that, I promptly install the kernel patches with the commit a664bf3d603d, reboot the system, and verify the active version using System Tools. If an update cannot be implemented temporarily in individual cases, I block the algif_aead module via \/etc\/modprobe.d and use initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init at boot. In addition, I harden Seccomp profiles so that untrusted processes cannot create AF_ALG sockets. These interim steps reduce the exploitability and replace the <strong>Update<\/strong> But no.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/shared-hosting-risk-copy-fail-2946.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Incident Monitoring and Response<\/h2>\n\n<p>I activate <strong>Audit<\/strong>-Mechanisms such as auditd to detect AF_ALG usage and suspicious setuid binary accesses. Centralized logs help me identify recurring patterns and isolate compromised accounts more quickly. When I suspect a compromise, I secure memory dumps, check process lists, compare hashes of system binaries, and validate package integrity. I then implement emergency measures: resetting access, rotating keys, setting temporary locks, and conducting in-depth forensic analyses. A clear <strong>Playbook<\/strong>-This structure shortens the response time and minimizes collateral damage.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Multi-Tenancy, Compliance, and Customer Communication<\/h2>\n\n<p>Multi-tenant environments require clear <strong>SLA<\/strong>-Policies, transparent notifications about patches, and defined maintenance windows. I document kernel updates in a traceable manner, confirm reboots, and maintain records for audits. Following an escalation, I systematically check which customer data may have been exposed and promptly notify those affected. Internal processes govern when incident reports are required and how I comply with regulatory deadlines. In this way, I build trust and reduce the <strong>Risk<\/strong> legal consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/copy_fail_risiko_shared_hosting_8392.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>From the Customer's Perspective: What Website Operators Should Do Now<\/h2>\n\n<p>End users also bear responsibility because compromised <strong>Accounts<\/strong> are often the gateway for local attacks. I rely on strong passwords and MFA, and I delete unused SSH or shell accounts. I consistently keep my CMS, plugins, and themes up to date to reduce initial points of entry. Regular integrity checks and backups shorten recovery time in the event that a breach does occur. The fewer unnecessary access points there are, the smaller the <strong>Attack surface<\/strong> for Copy Fail.<\/p>\n\n<h2>The Role of Distributed Linux Setups and Specialized Distributions<\/h2>\n\n<p>Many providers use customized <strong>Kernels<\/strong> or distributions like CloudLinux, which limit resources and permissions per account. Such measures reduce the impact on other systems if a single tenant is compromised; nevertheless, an unpatched kernel bug remains a vulnerability. In virtualized environments using KVM\/Xen, the key factor is whether a shared kernel is used; if workloads share the same kernel, the escalation of a local exploit remains a realistic possibility. I also take into account caching and IPC aspects, which can open additional leakage paths. Useful background information on <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/https-web-hosting-shared-memory-risks-hosting-cache-data-isolation\/\">Shared memory risks<\/a> help address these side effects in a more targeted manner.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/CopyFailVulnDesk1234.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Comparison: Models, Risks, and Countermeasures<\/h2>\n\n<p>To give you an idea, I'll summarize the most important <strong>Differences<\/strong> Compare hosting models and classify risks as well as recommended responses. This overview helps assess the extent to which Copy Fail affects the respective architecture. The key factors remain whether workloads share the same kernel and how strictly system calls are limited. The greater the separation, the lower the platform-wide impact of a local escalation. Nevertheless, the following applies: Without prompt <strong>Kernel Patch<\/strong> Every model remains vulnerable.<\/p>\n\n<table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th>Hosting model<\/th>\n      <th>Kernel Partitioning<\/th>\n      <th>Risk Due to Copy Failure<\/th>\n      <th>Key Measure<\/th>\n      <th>Additional Protection<\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Classic shared hosting<\/td>\n      <td>Yes (shared kernel)<\/td>\n      <td>High: Account-to-Host Escalation<\/td>\n      <td>Patch + Reboot (a664bf3d603d)<\/td>\n      <td>Seccomp block for AF_ALG; Monitoring<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Containers on a Shared Host<\/td>\n      <td>Yes (host kernel)<\/td>\n      <td>High: Container Escape to the Host<\/td>\n      <td>Patch + Reboot<\/td>\n      <td>gVisor\/MicroVM; restrictive policies<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>VMs with a hypervisor<\/td>\n      <td>No (separate guest kernel)<\/td>\n      <td>Measure: Guest compromised, host isolated<\/td>\n      <td>Patch in Guest + Host<\/td>\n      <td>Strict Segregation, Auditing, Backup Discipline<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>MicroVM Runtimes<\/td>\n      <td>No (strong separation)<\/td>\n      <td>Lower: reduced platform effect<\/td>\n      <td>Patch per MicroVM + Host<\/td>\n      <td>Strict Seccomp profiles, disable AF_ALG<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n<h2>Lessons from \"Copy Fail\" for Hosting Security<\/h2>\n\n<p>I see \"Copy Fail\" as a clear wake-up call for <strong>Processes<\/strong> related to patch management, architecture, and operations. Kernel-level components such as the page cache and cryptographic interfaces require strict change management. A robust cycle of monitoring, rapid rollout, reboot, and validation is now mandatory. Lessons learned from related page cache vulnerabilities such as <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/dirty-frag-linux-kernel-security-vulnerability-hosting-server-security-measures\/\">Dirty Question<\/a> show that such error sequences are signs of structural risks. Anyone who offers or uses shared hosting should <strong>Strategy<\/strong> Focus on stronger isolation, reliable updates, and minimizing the attack surface.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Practical Verification of Risk and Fix<\/h2>\n\n<p>I ensure that assessment and remediation are measurable. This includes:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li>Determine the kernel version and check the patch status (<code>uname -r<\/code>, package manager query, changelogs).<\/li>\n  <li>Inspect active modules: <code>algif_aead<\/code> must not be loaded during transition phases (e.g., via <code>lsmod<\/code> or <code>cat \/proc\/modules<\/code>).<\/li>\n  <li>View configuration status: <code>CONFIG_CRYPTO_USER_API_AEAD<\/code> Indicates whether the subsystem is generally available (<code>config-$(uname -r)<\/code>).<\/li>\n  <li>Validate boot parameters: <code>initcall_blacklist=algif_aead_init<\/code> must be effective in the live system (kernel command line and <code>dmesg<\/code> (check).<\/li>\n  <li>Verify authenticity after the reboot: Perform hash checks on the kernel packages, verify signatures, and compare them with the maintenance documentation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I deliberately distinguish between risk confirmation and exploit reproduction: The latter is unnecessary and potentially dangerous in production environments. It is sufficient to verify the presence of the vulnerable code paths and the absence of mitigations or kernel fixes.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Prerequisites, Limitations, and Common Errors<\/h2>\n\n<p>Copy Fail requires local code execution access, an available AF_ALG subsystem, and a vulnerable target file in the page cache. In practice, the following factors limit or complicate the exploit:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Hardening Against System Calls<\/strong>: Strict Seccomp profiles, sandboxed runtimes, or minimal images without AF_ALG reduce the likelihood of successful execution.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>File System Integrity<\/strong>: Mechanisms such as IMA\/EVM, fs-verity, read-only, noexec, and nosuid mounts, or immutable system partitions, reduce the time window available for executing tampered binaries.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Cache Behavior<\/strong>: The attack works within the page cache. Persistence is not guaranteed and depends on subsequent system behavior. However, once root privileges are obtained, they allow for permanent backdoors.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Role of Setuid Targets<\/strong>: Not all environments have executable setuid binaries in relevant paths or allow them to be launched in the tenant context.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Common misconceptions in incidents include the belief that the absence of file system changes on disk means the all-clear, or that container isolation provides sufficient protection. Shared kernels disprove both of these assumptions.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Operational Strategy: Patch Rollout Without Downtime<\/h2>\n\n<p>I plan updates so that security and availability go hand in hand:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Step-by-Step Model<\/strong>: Canary hosts first, followed by a batch rollout. Before the mass reboot, functional checks and synthetic monitoring validate the platform.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Maintenance window<\/strong>: Communicate with customers early, clearly, and through multiple channels. Offload workloads, reduce session stickiness, and preheat caches.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Automation<\/strong>: Orchestrated reboots, evaluate health checks, and automatically roll back in case of discrepancies.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Live patching, where available<\/strong>: Useful as a temporary solution, but not a substitute for reboots when kernel structures have been fundamentally corrected.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Documentation<\/strong>: Consistently record ticket references, affected assets, dates and times, and audit trail documents.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For clusters with a shared kernel, I prioritize edge and bastion nodes, followed by the host layers below the container\/VM orchestration. I patch and reboot CI\/CD runners and build workers\u2014which handle a lot of third-party code\u2014particularly early on.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Compatibility Issues with Temporary Mitigation Measures<\/h2>\n\n<p>The blacklisting of <strong>algif_aead<\/strong> Or, a Seccomp block for AF_ALG may affect a few specialized workloads, such as tools that intentionally use the AF_ALG interface. I therefore proceed as follows:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>take inventory<\/strong>: Which services use AF_ALG sockets? Configuration files, startup parameters, and telemetry can help identify them.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Check fallbacks<\/strong>: User-space crypto libraries should continue to run without kernel offload. Keep an eye on performance changes.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Specific Exception<\/strong>: Where absolutely necessary, create strictly defined whitelists and additionally enforce process and namespace isolation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I communicate performance or functional deviations openly and on a temporary basis. After the final kernel update, I remove the exceptions to keep the configuration lean.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Monitoring Playbook and Anomaly Detection<\/h2>\n\n<p>Monitoring is not only reactive but also effective as a preventive measure. I establish indicators that point to suspicious patterns:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>AF_ALG Activity<\/strong>: Unexpected socket creation from unprivileged contexts.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Executing a Setuid Binary<\/strong>: Frequent or atypical calls, especially those occurring at short intervals or originating from unusual paths.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Kernel Logs<\/strong>: Attempts to load blocked modules, Seccomp denials, audit events.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>File Integrity<\/strong>: Deviations from the reference hashes of critical binaries, even though page cache manipulations do not always persist.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Account Anomalies<\/strong>: New SSH keys, password changes, cron jobs, and suspicious systemd units following an escalation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I aggregate metrics and events centrally, provide them with context (client, host, process tree), and store playbooks for initial responses. This allows me to measurably reduce MTTD and MTTR.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hosting-sicherheitsrisiken-4812.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Incident Response: Recovery and Preservation of Evidence<\/h2>\n\n<p>After a suspected case of exploitation, I first restore the status quo ante:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Forensics<\/strong>: Memory and hard drive images of selected systems, process and network snapshots, timeline creation.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Containment<\/strong>: Isolate compromised accounts and affected nodes, terminate sessions, and rotate secrets and keys.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Rebuilding<\/strong>: Clean Golden Images, reproducible provisioning, minimal trust anchors. Use immutable system partitions whenever possible.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Validation<\/strong>: Integrity checks, compliance checklists, peer reviews for approvals.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I then thoroughly document which data might be affected and handle notifications in accordance with regulatory requirements. Lessons learned are incorporated into hardening, monitoring, and processes.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Governance and Auditability<\/h2>\n\n<p>I incorporate lessons learned from copy failures into policies and controls:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Patch Policy<\/strong>: Maximum time until remediation, defined priority levels, approval gates.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Change management<\/strong>: Risk assessments for changes close to the kernel, separate test and production paths.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Record-keeping<\/strong>: Information regarding patches, reboots, verifications, affected systems, and communication.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Continuous improvement<\/strong>: Metrics such as mean time to patch and coverage rates for hardening measures.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h2>Architecture Hardening in Practice<\/h2>\n\n<p>In addition to the patch, I use strict default restrictions and minimal trust zones:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Least Privilege<\/strong> and removal of SUID binaries, where possible. Alternatives using capabilities and strict policy profiles.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Mount options<\/strong> like <em>nosuid<\/em>, <em>nodev<\/em>, <em>noexec<\/em> on user and temporary paths.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Kernel Lockdown<\/strong> and signature-based boot chains to make it more difficult to tamper with the system at the root level.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Shielding of Crypto Interfaces<\/strong> through Seccomp, SELinux\/AppArmor profiles, and container policies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For particularly high-risk workloads, I isolate dedicated nodes or MicroVMs to further mitigate side-channel and cross-tenant effects.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Operational Scenarios and Classification<\/h2>\n\n<p>I assess the risk profile based on client type and level of activity:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Classic Web Hosting<\/strong>: Many interactive users, heterogeneous stacks\u2014top priority for patch + reboot, strict AF_ALG blocking until then.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>CI\/CD and Build Farms<\/strong>: High code turnover rate, a lot of third-party code\u2014early hardening of runners, aggressive Seccomp profiles, quick fixes.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Science\/HPC<\/strong>: Many Shell access points, scripts \u2013 stricter login policies, segmentation by project, close monitoring.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Managed Root<\/strong>: Fewer users, but high-level permissions\u2014rapid remediation, in-depth forensic analysis in the event of anomalies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>One thing they all have in common is this: Without a patched kernel, the residual risk from copy failures remains unacceptable.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/hosting-sicherheitsrisiken-4812.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Briefly summarized<\/h2>\n\n<p>The key message is: <strong>Copy Failed<\/strong> turns an ordinary user into a root admin on a shared host in no time. Server administrators should patch the kernel with the commit mentioned, reboot consistently, and temporarily block AF_ALG access. Administrators should also harden systems using MicroVM\/sandboxing, Seccomp, and clean audit trails to mitigate the impact of local exploits. Customers should secure access, reduce unnecessary logins, and keep applications up to date to prevent local execution from occurring in the first place. This allows them to realistically assess the risk and <strong>Attack surface<\/strong> to reduce it and preserve the integrity of the platform.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The \"Copy Fail\" vulnerability in the Linux kernel poses a critical risk to shared hosting platforms. This article explains the technical details, attack vectors, and protective measures for operators.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":20069,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[794],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sicherheit-computer_und_internet"],"acf":[],"_wp_attached_file":null,"_wp_attachment_metadata":null,"litespeed-optimize-size":null,"litespeed-optimize-set":null,"_elementor_source_image_hash":null,"_wp_attachment_image_alt":null,"stockpack_author_name":null,"stockpack_author_url":null,"stockpack_provider":null,"stockpack_image_url":null,"stockpack_license":null,"stockpack_license_url":null,"stockpack_modification":null,"color":null,"original_id":null,"original_url":null,"original_link":null,"unsplash_location":null,"unsplash_sponsor":null,"unsplash_exif":null,"unsplash_attachment_metadata":null,"_elementor_is_screenshot":null,"surfer_file_name":null,"surfer_file_original_url":null,"envato_tk_source_kit":null,"envato_tk_source_index":null,"envato_tk_manifest":null,"envato_tk_folder_name":null,"envato_tk_builder":null,"envato_elements_download_event":null,"_menu_item_type":null,"_menu_item_menu_item_parent":null,"_menu_item_object_id":null,"_menu_item_object":null,"_menu_item_target":null,"_menu_item_classes":null,"_menu_item_xfn":null,"_menu_item_url":null,"_trp_menu_languages":null,"rank_math_primary_category":null,"rank_math_title":null,"inline_featured_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":null,"rank_math_schema_blogposting":null,"rank_math_schema_videoobject":null,"_oembed_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_oembed_time_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":null,"_yoast_wpseo_linkdex":null,"_oembed_27e3473bf8bec795fbeb3a9d38489348":null,"_oembed_c3b0f6959478faf92a1f343d8f96b19e":null,"_trp_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_desired_post_slug":null,"_yoast_wpseo_title":null,"tldname":null,"tldpreis":null,"tldrubrik":null,"tldpolicylink":null,"tldsize":null,"tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"tldtransfer":null,"tldwhoisprivacy":null,"tldregistrarchange":null,"tldregistrantchange":null,"tldwhoisupdate":null,"tldnameserverupdate":null,"tlddeletesofort":null,"tlddeleteexpire":null,"tldumlaute":null,"tldrestore":null,"tldsubcategory":null,"tldbildname":null,"tldbildurl":null,"tldclean":null,"tldcategory":null,"tldpolicy":null,"tldbesonderheiten":null,"tld_bedeutung":null,"_oembed_d167040d816d8f94c072940c8009f5f8":null,"_oembed_b0a0fa59ef14f8870da2c63f2027d064":null,"_oembed_4792fa4dfb2a8f09ab950a73b7f313ba":null,"_oembed_33ceb1fe54a8ab775d9410abf699878d":null,"_oembed_fd7014d14d919b45ec004937c0db9335":null,"_oembed_21a029d076783ec3e8042698c351bd7e":null,"_oembed_be5ea8a0c7b18e658f08cc571a909452":null,"_oembed_a9ca7a298b19f9b48ec5914e010294d2":null,"_oembed_f8db6b27d08a2bb1f920e7647808899a":null,"_oembed_168ebde5096e77d8a89326519af9e022":null,"_oembed_cdb76f1b345b42743edfe25481b6f98f":null,"_oembed_87b0613611ae54e86e8864265404b0a1":null,"_oembed_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_oembed_time_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_tldname":null,"_tldclean":null,"_tldpreis":null,"_tldcategory":null,"_tldsubcategory":null,"_tldpolicy":null,"_tldpolicylink":null,"_tldsize":null,"_tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"_tldtransfer":null,"_tldwhoisprivacy":null,"_tldregistrarchange":null,"_tldregistrantchange":null,"_tldwhoisupdate":null,"_tldnameserverupdate":null,"_tlddeletesofort":null,"_tlddeleteexpire":null,"_tldumlaute":null,"_tldrestore":null,"_tldbildname":null,"_tldbildurl":null,"_tld_bedeutung":null,"_tldbesonderheiten":null,"_oembed_ad96e4112edb9f8ffa35731d4098bc6b":null,"_oembed_8357e2b8a2575c74ed5978f262a10126":null,"_oembed_3d5fea5103dd0d22ec5d6a33eff7f863":null,"_eael_widget_elements":null,"_oembed_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_oembed_time_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_aioseo_description":null,"_eb_attr":null,"_eb_data_table":null,"_oembed_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_oembed_time_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_acf_changed":null,"_wpcode_auto_insert":null,"_edit_last":null,"_edit_lock":null,"_oembed_e7b913c6c84084ed9702cb4feb012ddd":null,"_oembed_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_time_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"_oembed_time_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"rank_math_news_sitemap_robots":null,"rank_math_robots":null,"_eael_post_view_count":"85","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ru_ru":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_et":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lv":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fr_fr":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_old_slug":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_da_dk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pl_pl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_es_es":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_hu_hu":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fi":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ja":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lt_lt":null,"_elementor_edit_mode":null,"_elementor_template_type":null,"_elementor_version":null,"_elementor_pro_version":null,"_wp_page_template":null,"_elementor_page_settings":null,"_elementor_data":null,"_elementor_css":null,"_elementor_conditions":null,"_happyaddons_elements_cache":null,"_oembed_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_time_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_time_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_time_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_time_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_oembed_time_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_elementor_screenshot":null,"_oembed_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_oembed_time_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_elementor_controls_usage":null,"_elementor_page_assets":[],"_elementor_screenshot_failed":null,"theplus_transient_widgets":null,"_eael_custom_js":null,"_wp_old_date":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_it_it":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_pt":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_zh_cn":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_nl_nl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_br":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sv_se":null,"rank_math_analytic_object_id":null,"rank_math_internal_links_processed":"1","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ro_ro":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sk_sk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_bg_bg":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sl_si":null,"litespeed_vpi_list":null,"litespeed_vpi_list_mobile":null,"rank_math_seo_score":null,"rank_math_contentai_score":null,"ilj_limitincominglinks":null,"ilj_maxincominglinks":null,"ilj_limitoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_maxoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_limitlinksperparagraph":null,"ilj_linksperparagraph":null,"ilj_blacklistdefinition":null,"ilj_linkdefinition":null,"_eb_reusable_block_ids":null,"rank_math_focus_keyword":"Copy Fail","rank_math_og_content_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_content_score":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskeywords":null,"_yoast_wpseo_keywordsynonyms":null,"_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":null,"rank_math_description":null,"surfer_last_post_update":null,"surfer_last_post_update_direction":null,"surfer_keywords":null,"surfer_location":null,"surfer_draft_id":null,"surfer_permalink_hash":null,"surfer_scrape_ready":null,"_thumbnail_id":"20069","footnotes":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20076"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20076\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20069"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}