{"id":20444,"date":"2026-08-08T11:48:46","date_gmt":"2026-08-08T09:48:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/linux-live-patching-ohne-downtime-serverwartung\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T11:48:46","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T09:48:46","slug":"linux-live-patching-without-downtime-for-server-maintenance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/linux-live-patching-ohne-downtime-serverwartung\/","title":{"rendered":"Linux Live Patching: The Future of Server Maintenance Without Downtime"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Linux live patching allows for security-critical kernel updates to be applied while the system is running and closes vulnerabilities without stopping services. This is how I reduce <strong>Downtime<\/strong>, keep systems available, and significantly reduce the attack window.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Key points<\/h2>\n\n<p>I rely on <strong>Live<\/strong>-Patching, because availability and security go hand in hand. This approach shortens response times and reduces <strong>Risk<\/strong> in operation. Teams plan maintenance proactively instead of waiting for system restarts. Hosting platforms benefit because services remain available during updates <strong>online<\/strong> remain. At the same time, comprehensive patch management remains essential, since live patching primarily addresses the <strong>Kernel<\/strong> addressed.<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Without restarting<\/strong>: Kernel fixes are applied at runtime, and services remain available.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Faster Coverage<\/strong>: The available time window is shrinking noticeably.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Scheduled Maintenance<\/strong>: Less coordination, less weekend work.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Hosting Benefit<\/strong>: Patch web applications, databases, and APIs without downtime.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Addendum<\/strong>: Live patching is no substitute for a comprehensive update strategy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h2>What Live Patching Does in the Kernel<\/h2>\n\n<p>With live patching, corrections are applied directly to the running <strong>Kernel<\/strong>, without a reboot. Mechanisms such as function swapping or jump tables redirect calls to patched code. I see three key guidelines here: the security of the changes, a clear rollback option, and clean signatures. Vendors such as Red Hat (kpatch), SUSE (KLP\/kGraft), Canonical (Livepatch), Oracle (Ksplice), and TuxCare (KernelCare) follow the same <strong>Basic Principles<\/strong>. They inject verified patches into memory while keeping operations running smoothly.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/serverwartung-ohne-ausfall-7291.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Benefits for Operations and Safety<\/h2>\n\n<p>I minimize <strong>Downtime<\/strong>, because I roll out critical fixes immediately. This keeps the attack surface small and prevents tickets from piling up. Maintenance windows shrink, and teams regain predictable working hours. Services such as web servers, API gateways, and message brokers remain available during patching <strong>reachable<\/strong>. The combination of fewer reboots and faster responses strengthens the resilience of the overall system.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Application scenarios in hosting<\/h2>\n\n<p>Live patching pays off for 24\/7 workloads. I\u2019m thinking of web hosting, e-commerce, databases, virtualization, and critical enterprise applications. In these areas in particular, reboots cost patience, time, and revenue. Anyone who wants to evaluate how different methods and providers compare will find this compact overview of <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/live-kernel-patching-kernelcare-ksplice-kpatch-kgraft-secure\/\">A Comparison of Live Kernel Patching Methods<\/a> useful guidance. For managed stacks, live patching offers tangible benefits because changes can be made without downtime <strong>be incorporated<\/strong> and SLAs remain reliable.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/linux_live_patching_8432.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Tools and Distributions<\/h2>\n\n<p>I choose the tool based on distribution, support model, and automation. Red Hat offers <strong>kpatch<\/strong>, SUSE uses KLP\/kGraft, while Ubuntu relies on Canonical Livepatch. Oracle provides Ksplice, and TuxCare\u2019s KernelCare is widely used across various distributions. Key questions include: How are patches signed, how does rollback work, and how does the solution integrate with CI\/CD? The following table provides a concise <strong>Overview<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n<table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th>Solution<\/th>\n      <th>Distributions<\/th>\n      <th>Automation<\/th>\n      <th>Special feature<\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td>kpatch<\/td>\n      <td>RHEL, CentOS Stream, and compatible derivatives<\/td>\n      <td>Repo\/Daemon-controlled<\/td>\n      <td>Aligned with Red Hat's Lifecycle and Support<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>KLP\/kGraft<\/td>\n      <td>SUSE Linux Enterprise<\/td>\n      <td>Update Channels<\/td>\n      <td>Integrated into SLES tooling<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Canonical Livepatch<\/td>\n      <td>Ubuntu LTS<\/td>\n      <td>Token-based service<\/td>\n      <td>Integration with Ubuntu Processes<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Ksplice<\/td>\n      <td>Oracle Linux, compatible kernels<\/td>\n      <td>Agent\/Repo<\/td>\n      <td>Historically, an early provider<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>KernelCare<\/td>\n      <td>Several enterprise distributions<\/td>\n      <td>Agent, centrally controllable<\/td>\n      <td>Wide Distro Coverage<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n<p>I check in advance which kernel versions are supported and how patches can be tested. I also consider compatibility with security modules, observability agents, and <strong>Storage<\/strong>-drivers. A reproducible test run using staging servers reduces risks during deployment. In addition, I believe documentation and change logs should be maintained consistently <strong>current<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Business Administration and SLA<\/h2>\n\n<p>Fewer reboots mean less night and weekend work. I can schedule maintenance during quiet time slots and avoid conflicting changes. This reduces the coordination effort and stress in the event of an incident. This overview provides a good framework for <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/kernelcare-vs-reboot-live-patching-cost-effectiveness\/\">Cost-Effectiveness of Reboots<\/a>. When it comes to SLAs, what matters in the end is that services remain available <strong>available<\/strong>, and security fixes are deployed promptly to all nodes.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Security Processes and Compliance<\/h2>\n\n<p>I integrate live patching with threat intelligence, ticketing, and change management. CVE ratings determine the order of priority, followed by testing and phased rollouts. Audit logs document the time, package version, and person responsible. This makes it easier to provide evidence to <strong>Revision<\/strong> and customers. The key point is this: Live patching complements more rigorous measures such as hardening, rights management, and clean <strong>Network<\/strong>-segments.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Limits and Risks<\/h2>\n\n<p>Not every fix can be applied in real time. Major ABI or structural changes still require a reboot. I therefore plan regular reboots at longer intervals to clear out legacy issues. Before the production rollout, I ensure regression tests are completed and a quick <strong>Rollback<\/strong> . I also keep the number of kernel versions manageable so that it's easier to <strong>analyze<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/linux_patching_tech_3847.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Step-by-Step Implementation Strategy<\/h2>\n\n<p>I\u2019ll start by taking stock of kernel versions, distro releases, and support lifecycles. Next, I\u2019ll set up staging environments that run under conditions similar to production and simulate typical workloads. I\u2019ll define clear criteria for approval, including test cases for <strong>I\/O<\/strong>, network workloads, and critical modules. I then roll out patches in waves, starting with less sensitive hosts and gradually increasing coverage. Finally, I collect metrics, adjust policies, and hold a regular <strong>Retro<\/strong> depends on the quality of the updates.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Monitoring and Rollback<\/h2>\n\n<p>A central dashboard shows me patch status, kernel builds, and open CVEs per host. I link events to alerts so that issues are detected early. For rollbacks, I rely on documented procedures, consistent package sources, and host tags. Where possible, I use snapshots to quickly restore systems from faulty states. <strong>leave<\/strong>. Clear lines of communication keep teams closely connected when the need arises <strong>voted<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/serverwartung_linux_patch_8375.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>A Look Ahead to the Future<\/h2>\n\n<p>I expect more automation, more granular telemetry, and tighter integration with orchestration. eBPF-based checks could perform validations before and after patching <strong>Simplify<\/strong>. In addition, live patching is gradually shifting beyond the kernel\u2014toward firmware and libraries, for example. For Ubuntu environments, this remains <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/kernel-live-patching-on-ubuntu-canonical-livepatch-security-server\/\">Canonical Livepatch<\/a> A practical introduction to everyday life. Overall, the field is maturing, and administrative workflows are benefiting from less friction while maintaining high <strong>Security<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Kubernetes and Container Orchestration<\/h2>\n\n<p>In container environments, live patching pays off twice: I minimize the need to reboot entire <strong>Worker<\/strong>-Ties and keeps pods stable. This involves the judicious use of cordon\/drain strategies: I <em>cordone<\/em> only if I want to flush the nodes anyway; for pure live patches without a reboot, telemetry and a controlled rollout are often sufficient. PodDisruptionBudgets and <strong>taints<\/strong> prevent overload in clusters, while I process them one by one per <strong>Error domain<\/strong> (AZ, rack, host group). I ensure the availability of StatefulSets with strict availability requirements using readiness and liveness checks, and I start with secondary replicas. I treat Ingress and API Gateway nodes like frontends: small batches, <strong>Canary<\/strong>-Hosts, then width.<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n  <li>Node updates in waves: small subsets, SLO monitoring, then expansion.<\/li>\n  <li>Respect PDBs and leave schedulers enough capacity for migrations.<\/li>\n  <li>Check DaemonSets (logging\/monitoring) for compatibility before I begin large-scale rollouts.<\/li>\n  <li>Managed Kubernetes: I clarify in advance how the provider applies kernel patches and which <strong>Controls<\/strong> I have on the client side.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/linux-live-patching-future-5748.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Performance and Stability Considerations<\/h2>\n\n<p>Live patches work by redirecting calls to patched functions. This typically results in only minimal overhead, but it depends on the frequency and criticality of the affected code paths. I therefore consider <strong>Latency<\/strong>-Isolate sensitive workloads (e.g., trading, VoIP) and measure them using stable baselines. Microbenchmarks reveal trends, but production-like load profiles are the deciding factor. It is important to have a clean <strong>Observability<\/strong> related to system calls, scheduler behavior, I\/O wait times, and network latencies.<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n  <li>Before\/After Metrics: CPU wait, context switches, IRQ load, tail latencies.<\/li>\n  <li>Heat maps and <strong>percentiles<\/strong> rather than just averages, in order to identify outliers.<\/li>\n  <li>Stable kernel parameters (sysctl) to ensure that no drift distorts the measurements.<\/li>\n  <li>Clear regression thresholds: If patches exceed defined tolerances, I stop the batch.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p>For real-time variants (<strong>PREEMPT_RT<\/strong>) I take into account specific patch availability and test strict SLOs. Also NUMA layouts, <strong>CPU pinning<\/strong> and IRQ affinities may interact with patched hotpaths. I therefore ensure that test runs are reproducible and document any deviations.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Drivers, eBPF, and Specialized Workloads<\/h2>\n\n<p>In practice, problems rarely arise with core patches; they are more common with third-party modules and specialized stacks. DKMS-based <strong>Kernel Modules<\/strong> (e.g., storage HBAs, GPU\/SmartNIC drivers) I test particularly thoroughly. For eBPF\/XDP programs, IDS\/IPS filters, or high-speed network paths (DPDK), I require testing with realistic packet flows. File systems with exotic features, multipath setups, or proprietary RAID stacks also get their own test cases.<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n  <li>Matching the module and <strong>ABI<\/strong>-Statuses with patch levels; identify inconsistencies early.<\/li>\n  <li>Check eBPF programs for compatibility and performance, including fixmaps and verifier results.<\/li>\n  <li>Validate storage paths using FIO\/workload replays before I open the window.<\/li>\n  <li>Establish an emergency plan: <strong>Kdump<\/strong>\/Crash dumps, backed-up boot entries, remote access (ILO\/IPMI) for quick recovery.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/linux-serverwartung-1289.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Supply Chain, Signatures, and Traceability<\/h2>\n\n<p>I consider live patching to be part of the <strong>Supply Chain Security<\/strong>. This includes signed artifacts, reproducible builds, and strict provenance controls. I manage key material centrally, rotate it according to policy, and log every verification. Patch sets are assigned unique IDs so that I can reference them accurately in ticketing, the CMDB, and inventory. For audits, I maintain <strong>Certifications<\/strong>, checksums, responsible parties, and release dates\u2014which makes it easier for me to meet requirements in regulated environments (e.g., ISO 27001, SOC 2, or BSI standards).<\/p>\n\n<p>Rollback remains a core component: I don't just document the process <em>forward<\/em>, but also the planned route <em>back<\/em>. These include compatible package sources, fixed <strong>Version Pins<\/strong> and a clear statement on when a planned reboot is unavoidable instead of a rollback (e.g., in the case of structural kernel changes).<\/p>\n\n<h2>Costs, Licenses, and Capacity Planning<\/h2>\n\n<p>From a business perspective, I expect three key factors: fewer minutes of downtime, fewer <strong>Overtime<\/strong> and less coordination effort. Licensing models vary\u2014per host, per socket, or as a flat rate in a subscription package. I compare these costs to the opportunity costs of traditional maintenance windows. In hybrid or multi-cloud environments, I also take capacity reserves into account: If I <strong>Blue\/Green<\/strong>-Since I run segments in parallel for security reasons, I factor their resource requirements into the TCO. Live patching saves costs here because I can often avoid having to maintain duplicate capacity.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Measurable Successes and SLO Management<\/h2>\n\n<p>To track progress, I measure it continuously. I link patch rollouts to <strong>Service Level<\/strong>-Set goals and evaluate their impact on stability and performance. This leads to data-driven improvements rather than relying on gut feelings.<\/p>\n\n<ul>\n  <li>Patch Lag: Median time from CVE publication to patch rollout per host group.<\/li>\n  <li>Reboot Frequency: Number of scheduled\/unscheduled reboots per quarter; the goal is a <strong>Reduction<\/strong>.<\/li>\n  <li>Change Failure Rate: Percentage of patches that result in a rollback or an incident.<\/li>\n  <li>Availability minutes gained: Maintenance windows saved multiplied by the number of affected services.<\/li>\n  <li>Performance metrics: tail latencies, error rates, resource spikes before and after the patch.<\/li>\n  <li>Audit Completeness: Coverage of supporting documentation (signatures, approvals, <strong>Logs<\/strong>).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h2>Practical Checklist and Runbooks<\/h2>\n\n<ul>\n  <li>Inventory and <strong>Support<\/strong>-Check the status of: kernel versions, modules, drivers, and policies.<\/li>\n  <li>Staging with production-like load; reproducible tests for I\/O, network, memory, and eBPF.<\/li>\n  <li>Canary Strategy: 1\u20135 % hosts first, closely monitored by metrics and logs.<\/li>\n  <li>Rollout by zone\/rack\/cluster group; clear <strong>Stop Criteria<\/strong>.<\/li>\n  <li>Rollback Playbook: Version Pins, Package Sources, Boot Entries, Remote Console, <strong>Snapshots<\/strong>.<\/li>\n  <li>Observability: Dashboards, alert thresholds, synthetic checks, end-to-end transactions.<\/li>\n  <li>Security Process: CVE prioritization, approval gates, dual-control principle, documentation.<\/li>\n  <li>Team Communication: Change Notifications, ChatOps, Escalation Paths, Post-Change Review.<\/li>\n  <li>Regular <strong>Reboots<\/strong> plan to apply non-production-ready changes in batches.<\/li>\n  <li>Continuous improvement: Analyze key metrics, refine policies, and update training programs.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h2>My brief summary<\/h2>\n\n<p>Linux live patching reduces downtime, speeds up responses to vulnerabilities, and significantly lightens the load on teams. I combine it with proper patch and update management, testing, and monitoring. Not every fix can be applied live to the <strong>Kernel<\/strong>, which is why I plan periodic reboots carefully. Those who operate 24\/7 services benefit from fewer interruptions and better SLA compliance. This keeps operations secure, predictable, and reliable for customers <strong>reachable<\/strong>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Linux Live Patching enables kernel updates without interrupting service. It provides greater security, less downtime, and improved availability for servers.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":20437,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[922],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-technologie"],"acf":[],"_wp_attached_file":null,"_wp_attachment_metadata":null,"litespeed-optimize-size":null,"litespeed-optimize-set":null,"_elementor_source_image_hash":null,"_wp_attachment_image_alt":null,"stockpack_author_name":null,"stockpack_author_url":null,"stockpack_provider":null,"stockpack_image_url":null,"stockpack_license":null,"stockpack_license_url":null,"stockpack_modification":null,"color":null,"original_id":null,"original_url":null,"original_link":null,"unsplash_location":null,"unsplash_sponsor":null,"unsplash_exif":null,"unsplash_attachment_metadata":null,"_elementor_is_screenshot":null,"surfer_file_name":null,"surfer_file_original_url":null,"envato_tk_source_kit":null,"envato_tk_source_index":null,"envato_tk_manifest":null,"envato_tk_folder_name":null,"envato_tk_builder":null,"envato_elements_download_event":null,"_menu_item_type":null,"_menu_item_menu_item_parent":null,"_menu_item_object_id":null,"_menu_item_object":null,"_menu_item_target":null,"_menu_item_classes":null,"_menu_item_xfn":null,"_menu_item_url":null,"_trp_menu_languages":null,"rank_math_primary_category":null,"rank_math_title":null,"inline_featured_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":null,"rank_math_schema_blogposting":null,"rank_math_schema_videoobject":null,"_oembed_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_oembed_time_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":null,"_yoast_wpseo_linkdex":null,"_oembed_27e3473bf8bec795fbeb3a9d38489348":null,"_oembed_c3b0f6959478faf92a1f343d8f96b19e":null,"_trp_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_desired_post_slug":null,"_yoast_wpseo_title":null,"tldname":null,"tldpreis":null,"tldrubrik":null,"tldpolicylink":null,"tldsize":null,"tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"tldtransfer":null,"tldwhoisprivacy":null,"tldregistrarchange":null,"tldregistrantchange":null,"tldwhoisupdate":null,"tldnameserverupdate":null,"tlddeletesofort":null,"tlddeleteexpire":null,"tldumlaute":null,"tldrestore":null,"tldsubcategory":null,"tldbildname":null,"tldbildurl":null,"tldclean":null,"tldcategory":null,"tldpolicy":null,"tldbesonderheiten":null,"tld_bedeutung":null,"_oembed_d167040d816d8f94c072940c8009f5f8":null,"_oembed_b0a0fa59ef14f8870da2c63f2027d064":null,"_oembed_4792fa4dfb2a8f09ab950a73b7f313ba":null,"_oembed_33ceb1fe54a8ab775d9410abf699878d":null,"_oembed_fd7014d14d919b45ec004937c0db9335":null,"_oembed_21a029d076783ec3e8042698c351bd7e":null,"_oembed_be5ea8a0c7b18e658f08cc571a909452":null,"_oembed_a9ca7a298b19f9b48ec5914e010294d2":null,"_oembed_f8db6b27d08a2bb1f920e7647808899a":null,"_oembed_168ebde5096e77d8a89326519af9e022":null,"_oembed_cdb76f1b345b42743edfe25481b6f98f":null,"_oembed_87b0613611ae54e86e8864265404b0a1":null,"_oembed_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_oembed_time_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_tldname":null,"_tldclean":null,"_tldpreis":null,"_tldcategory":null,"_tldsubcategory":null,"_tldpolicy":null,"_tldpolicylink":null,"_tldsize":null,"_tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"_tldtransfer":null,"_tldwhoisprivacy":null,"_tldregistrarchange":null,"_tldregistrantchange":null,"_tldwhoisupdate":null,"_tldnameserverupdate":null,"_tlddeletesofort":null,"_tlddeleteexpire":null,"_tldumlaute":null,"_tldrestore":null,"_tldbildname":null,"_tldbildurl":null,"_tld_bedeutung":null,"_tldbesonderheiten":null,"_oembed_ad96e4112edb9f8ffa35731d4098bc6b":null,"_oembed_8357e2b8a2575c74ed5978f262a10126":null,"_oembed_3d5fea5103dd0d22ec5d6a33eff7f863":null,"_eael_widget_elements":null,"_oembed_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_oembed_time_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_aioseo_description":null,"_eb_attr":null,"_eb_data_table":null,"_oembed_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_oembed_time_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_acf_changed":null,"_wpcode_auto_insert":null,"_edit_last":null,"_edit_lock":null,"_oembed_e7b913c6c84084ed9702cb4feb012ddd":null,"_oembed_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_time_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"_oembed_time_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"rank_math_news_sitemap_robots":null,"rank_math_robots":null,"_eael_post_view_count":"182","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ru_ru":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_et":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lv":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fr_fr":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_old_slug":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_da_dk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pl_pl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_es_es":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_hu_hu":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fi":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ja":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lt_lt":null,"_elementor_edit_mode":null,"_elementor_template_type":null,"_elementor_version":null,"_elementor_pro_version":null,"_wp_page_template":null,"_elementor_page_settings":null,"_elementor_data":null,"_elementor_css":null,"_elementor_conditions":null,"_happyaddons_elements_cache":null,"_oembed_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_time_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_time_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_time_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_time_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_oembed_time_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_elementor_screenshot":null,"_oembed_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_oembed_time_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_elementor_controls_usage":null,"_elementor_page_assets":[],"_elementor_screenshot_failed":null,"theplus_transient_widgets":null,"_eael_custom_js":null,"_wp_old_date":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_it_it":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_pt":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_zh_cn":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_nl_nl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_br":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sv_se":null,"rank_math_analytic_object_id":null,"rank_math_internal_links_processed":"1","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ro_ro":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sk_sk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_bg_bg":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sl_si":null,"litespeed_vpi_list":null,"litespeed_vpi_list_mobile":null,"rank_math_seo_score":null,"rank_math_contentai_score":null,"ilj_limitincominglinks":null,"ilj_maxincominglinks":null,"ilj_limitoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_maxoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_limitlinksperparagraph":null,"ilj_linksperparagraph":null,"ilj_blacklistdefinition":null,"ilj_linkdefinition":null,"_eb_reusable_block_ids":null,"rank_math_focus_keyword":"Linux Live Patching","rank_math_og_content_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_content_score":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskeywords":null,"_yoast_wpseo_keywordsynonyms":null,"_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":null,"rank_math_description":null,"surfer_last_post_update":null,"surfer_last_post_update_direction":null,"surfer_keywords":null,"surfer_location":null,"surfer_draft_id":null,"surfer_permalink_hash":null,"surfer_scrape_ready":null,"_thumbnail_id":"20437","footnotes":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20444"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20444\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20437"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}