{"id":21010,"date":"2026-08-26T08:33:40","date_gmt":"2026-08-26T06:33:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/mysql-explain-analyze-abfragen-interpretieren-query-tuning\/"},"modified":"2026-08-26T08:33:40","modified_gmt":"2026-08-26T06:33:40","slug":"interpreting-mysql-explain-and-analyze-queries-query-tuning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/mysql-explain-analyze-abfragen-interpretieren-query-tuning\/","title":{"rendered":"MySQL EXPLAIN ANALYZE: Interpreting Queries Correctly for Maximum Performance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I use `mysql explain` to analyze how MySQL 8 creates an execution plan <strong>performs<\/strong> and which steps take a measurable amount of time. This way, based on actual execution times, line counts, and loops, I can identify where to adjust my plan and the <strong>Performance<\/strong> to specifically increase the number of my queries.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Key points<\/h2>\n\n<p>To help you get right to the point, I'll briefly summarize the most important learning objectives and list the corresponding <strong>Priorities<\/strong>. Every line in the plan tells a story, and I'll show you what you really <strong>respected<\/strong>. Read through the points, review your queries, and apply what you've learned directly to your tuning steps.<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Actual durations<\/strong>: EXPLAIN ANALYZE executes the query and measures the time for each step.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Estimates vs. Reality<\/strong>: Large deviations indicate incorrect statistics or missing indices.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>TREE format<\/strong>: The plan as a tree makes iterators, filters, and joins visible.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Hotspots<\/strong>: A long \u201etime to last row\u201c and many loops indicate tuning targets.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Index Strategy<\/strong>: Appropriate (including composite) indices significantly reduce costs.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The list gives you a clear <strong>direction<\/strong>, but it's only when you actually read the plan that you can put that knowledge to good use. Right after that, I'll show you how I evaluate each key figure and what the next steps are <strong>Steps<\/strong> I infer from this.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/mysql-analyse-buero-8723.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>EXPLAIN vs. EXPLAIN ANALYZE: What I'm Really Measuring<\/h2>\n\n<p>With the classic EXPLAIN, I see the optimizer's planned path, that is, a <strong>Draft<\/strong> with estimated costs and row counts. This plan reveals the order of the tables, the indexes used, and the join strategy, though without any actual <strong>Measured values<\/strong>. EXPLAIN ANALYZE continues and actually executes the query, measuring the time to the first and last rows as well as the loops. This allows me to immediately see which node in the tree takes the most time and where I should start. That way, I replace assumptions with measured <strong>Data<\/strong> and make informed decisions about optimization.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Syntax and Typical Use Cases<\/h2>\n\n<p>I'll start the analysis with a simple command: <code>EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT ...<\/code>, because it allows me to immediately <strong>Running times<\/strong> per node. The output in TREE format shows iterators such as scans, joins, sorts, and filters with estimated and actual <strong>Lines<\/strong>. I use this especially for recurring queries, multi-table UPDATE\/DELETE statements, and statements with ORDER BY or GROUP BY. Optionally, it helps me <code>FORMAT=JSON<\/code>, if I want to take a deep dive into the cost model, but for day-to-day tuning, the tree is usually sufficient. Anyone who wants to delve deeper into optimizer issues will find good ideas in <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/mysql-optimizer-query-hosting-optimization-serverboost\/\">Optimizer Details<\/a>, which I use in my daily work.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/mysql_meeting_9245.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Here's How I Read the TREE Plan<\/h2>\n\n<p>I view each node as a separate step that produces data or <strong>filters<\/strong>. Scans return rows from tables or indexes, joins combine streams, filters reduce the number of rows, and sorts organize or group the <strong>Results<\/strong>. The fields \u201erows (actual\/estimated),\u201c \u201etime to first row,\u201c \u201etime to last row,\u201c and \u201eloops\u201c are my most important indicators. If the actual number of rows deviates significantly from the estimate, I correct statistics or indexes. If \u201etime to last row\u201c takes an extremely long time, I check for late sorts, large joins, or mismatched <strong>Filter<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Understanding Key Metrics: From Estimate to Reality<\/h2>\n\n<p>I'll summarize the most important metrics in a clear table so you can quickly identify typical signals <strong>recognize<\/strong>. Each line explains what a metric means, what warning signs I'm watching for, and what action is usually <strong>Helps<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th>Key figure<\/th>\n      <th>Meaning<\/th>\n      <th>warning signal<\/th>\n      <th>Tuning Approach<\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td>rows (est\/act)<\/td>\n      <td>Planned vs. Actual <strong>Lines<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>Large discrepancy (e.g., 10 vs. 100,000)<\/td>\n      <td>Update statistics, missing <strong>Indices<\/strong> check<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>time to first row<\/td>\n      <td>Time until the first <strong>Issue<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>Slow, despite the small number of results<\/td>\n      <td>Check the start node, early filters <strong>strengthen<\/strong><\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Time to the last row<\/td>\n      <td>Total duration of the <strong>Nodes<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>Significantly higher than \u201efirst row\u201c<\/td>\n      <td>Sorting, Join Strategy, Streams <strong>reduce<\/strong><\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>loops<\/td>\n      <td>Frequency of the <strong>Repetition<\/strong><\/td>\n      <td>A very large number of iterations<\/td>\n      <td>Rearranging Joins, Subqueries <strong>form<\/strong><\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/mysql-explain-analyze-performance-8159.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Interpreting Operators Correctly: Scans, Joins, Sorts<\/h2>\n\n<p>I pay attention to which <strong>Iterator<\/strong> who actually does the work:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Index range\/unique scan<\/strong>: Ideal for selective WHERE conditions and matching prefixes; \u201etime to first row\u201c is short, while \u201etime to last row\u201c depends on the result set.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Table scan<\/strong>: Warning sign for large tables; in that case, I look for suitable filters, composite indexes, or ways to rewrite the query.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Nested-loop join<\/strong>: Standard strategy; a large number of \u201eloops\u201c indicate an unsuitable driver or a missing index on the inner table.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Hash join<\/strong> (MySQL 8): Good for large, evenly distributed Equi-Joins. \u201eTime to first row\u201c may be higher (during the build phase), but \u201etime to last row\u201c benefits when the sample stream is large.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Sort<\/strong>\/<strong>Group<\/strong>: Clearly visible as separate nodes in TREE. Long execution times often indicate a lack of support from indexes.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Filter<\/strong>: Late filters indicate missed opportunities for index condition pushdown or earlier selection.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If a sort node dominates \u201etime to last row,\u201c I check whether the desired order can be achieved using an index, for example by <strong>Covering<\/strong>-Indexes with the appropriate sort order. If the ORDER BY clause matches the index definition (direction, prefix), the sort step is often skipped entirely.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Measurement Methodology: How I Make Fair Comparisons<\/h2>\n\n<p>I don't just measure it once. Caching effects can skew the results, so:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li>I run EXPLAIN ANALYZE multiple times and evaluate the median and range instead of a single value.<\/li>\n  <li>I distinguish between \u201ecold\u201c and \u201ewarm\u201c cache: Warm measurements show what users experience after the first execution.<\/li>\n  <li>I vary representative parameters so that the plan doesn't just look good for a trivial example.<\/li>\n  <li>I document the schema and data state so that I can review the results later.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For DML statements (UPDATE\/DELETE), I use a transaction: <code>START TRANSACTION; EXPLAIN ANALYZE UPDATE ...; ROLLBACK;<\/code>. This way, I get real measurements without causing permanent changes. Important: EXPLAIN ANALYZE <strong>leads<\/strong> \u2014 so I use it with caution on production systems.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Statistics and Data Distribution: Correcting Estimation Errors<\/h2>\n\n<p>Large gaps between the \u201eestimated\u201c and \u201eactual\u201c rows are often caused by skewed data distributions. In such cases, I take a two-pronged approach:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Update Statistics<\/strong>: I make sure the optimizer has up-to-date information. Fresh statistics improve join and index selection.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Using Histograms<\/strong>: For highly skewed columns, histograms help provide more realistic estimates of selectivity. In EXPLAIN ANALYZE, the difference between the estimate and the actual value then visibly decreases.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If the estimates continue to be off after the refresh, I examine composite indexes in order of the most selective predicates and look at correlations between columns. The goal is to feed as few, well-pre-filtered rows as possible into the expensive operators as early as possible.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Semi-Join Strategies and Subqueries<\/h2>\n\n<p>MySQL 8 often converts IN\/EXISTS predicates into semi-join plans. In the TREE, I see this as a Materialization, FirstMatch, or Loose Index Scan. I pay attention to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Materialization<\/strong>: A subset is created once and reused multiple times\u2014which works well for moderately sized sets.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>FirstMatch<\/strong>: Stop early after the first hit\u2014this saves loops when few hits per outer row are expected.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Loose Index Scan<\/strong>: Very efficient for DISTINCT-like patterns using indexes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Subqueries that run for each row of the outer table cause \u201eloops\u201c to balloon. I rewrite them as JOINs or deliberately materialize them (CTE\/Derived) so that the execution plan performs the expensive work once and then references it efficiently.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/mysql_analyze_4892.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Targeted SQL Optimization: Step by Step<\/h2>\n\n<p>I'll start with the index strategy and optimize common WHERE and JOIN conditions using <strong>Indices<\/strong> . If I need multiple columns for filtering or sorting, I set up composite indexes and arrange the columns based on the most frequent <strong>Predicates<\/strong>. Next, I optimize subqueries that run in loops by rewriting them or converting them into joins. I replace `SELECT *` with specific columns so that less data is moved and the execution plan is optimized. After that, I keep the statistics up to date, because inaccurate estimates lead the optimizer to <strong>Erring paths<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Indexing in Practice: Covering, Order, Experiments<\/h2>\n\n<p>I use three simple controls that are immediately visible in EXPLAIN ANALYZE:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Covering indices<\/strong>: If the index contains all the necessary columns (filter, join, projection), the execution plan avoids table lookups. \u201eTime to last row\u201c is often significantly reduced.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Column Order<\/strong>: I sort by selectivity and usage type (filter before sort). For ORDER BY and GROUP BY, I use the correct direction and the appropriate prefix.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Index Experiments<\/strong>: Using temporary, <em>invisible<\/em> I test indexes to see if the optimizer would choose them without destabilizing existing plans. If the plan improves, I enable the index permanently.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If there are multiple candidate indexes, I compare the execution plans using EXPLAIN ANALYZE and consistently measure \u201etime to last row.\u201c When in doubt, I choose the plan with the most consistent execution time across different parameter values.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Practical Example: Read the Plan, Set the Index, Measure Success<\/h2>\n\n<p>Here's a common query: <code>EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT o.id, o.date, c.name FROM orders o JOIN customers c ON c.id = o.customer_id WHERE o.date &gt;= '2025-01-01' ORDER BY o.date DESC;<\/code> and first check the node for the table <strong>orders<\/strong>. If the plan reports a high number of actual rows and a full table scan, I create an appropriate index, for example on <code>orders(date, customer_id)<\/code>. Then I compare the \u201etime to last row\u201c before and after the change, because this number clearly shows the overall effect <strong>shows<\/strong>. If the ORDER BY clause matches the index order, I avoid having to sort the data and significantly reduce the total execution time. That way, I can demonstrate progress using measured values rather than vague <strong>Impressions<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Analyzing DML Statements Safely<\/h2>\n\n<p>For UPDATE\/DELETE operations that modify the data set, I take a structured approach:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li>I wrap the measurement in a transaction and roll it back if I just want to measure it.<\/li>\n  <li>I'm checking to see if triggers\/constraints are causing additional costs\u2014EXPLAIN ANALYZE shows increased execution times in the affected nodes.<\/li>\n  <li>I pay attention to the ratio of \u201eaffected rows\u201c to \u201erows actual\u201c\u2014a poor ratio indicates that filtering is happening too late or that indexes are missing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For multi-table UPDATEs, join order and index coverage are critical. Long \u201etime to last row\u201c at sort\/join nodes indicate potential for index improvements or a rewrite into two targeted statements with temporary storage.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/mysql_explain_analyze_8374.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>The Impact of Hosting on Query Performance<\/h2>\n\n<p>I don't view the database in isolation, because memory, I\/O, and the CPU all influence every <strong>Runtime<\/strong>. Fast SSDs reduce read wait times, sufficient RAM increases the buffer pool, and a robust CPU stack speeds up sorting, aggregations, and <strong>Joins<\/strong>. In production environments, I prefer hosting setups that can handle data-intensive workloads well. I also find helpful background information on optimizer topics in <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/an-inside-look-at-the-mariadb-query-optimizer-sql-tuning-insights\/\">Internal Optimizer<\/a>, which I use as a complementary perspective. When I combine a well-thought-out plan with a strong environment, I achieve tangible gains in <strong>Response times<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Resources and Operators in Context<\/h2>\n\n<p>When reading the plan, I pay close attention to memory-intensive nodes. Large sorts or hash joins require memory; if they are too large, they fall back to temporary tables. In the TREE, I can recognize this by late, slow nodes and a noticeable difference between \u201etime to first row\u201c and \u201etime to last row.\u201c I respond by:<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li>Reduce the input volume (use filters earlier, use better join drivers).<\/li>\n  <li>Improved index support for the desired order to avoid sorting issues.<\/li>\n  <li>Check whether the join type (Nested Loop vs. Hash) is appropriate for the amount of data.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Especially when running reports, I run EXPLAIN ANALYZE on representative data, not on mini-snapshots. Only then do the metrics reflect real-world workloads.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/mysql-analyse-0912.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Best Practices for Everyday Life<\/h2>\n\n<p>First, I analyze the queries that stand out in the logs or that users regularly report as slow <strong>report<\/strong>. Then I run EXPLAIN ANALYZE, document the key metrics, and compare the estimates with the actual results. Based on this, I make targeted changes to indexes and queries and record the before-and-after results to track progress <strong>make<\/strong>. I schedule these analyses early in the development process, rather than waiting for production issues to arise. Through repeated reviews, I identify patterns more quickly and make more confident decisions about <strong>Tuning<\/strong>-measures.<\/p>\n\n<h2>A Practical Checklist for Faster Planning<\/h2>\n\n<ul>\n  <li>Estimated and actual votes <strong>rows<\/strong> Do they roughly match? If not: Check the statistics\/histograms.<\/li>\n  <li>Does a node dominate \u201etime to last row\u201c? First candidate for tuning (index, join selection, avoiding sorts).<\/li>\n  <li>Are \u201eloops\u201c very high? Optimize the join driver\/index on the inner table or use a semi-join.<\/li>\n  <li>Are there any late sorts\/groups? Align the index order and direction with the ORDER BY\/GROUP BY clauses.<\/li>\n  <li>Does the query really need all those columns? Work toward creating a covering index and streamline the SELECT list.<\/li>\n  <li>A subquery per row? Rewrite as a JOIN or materialize it.<\/li>\n  <li>Stable across parameters? Measure using multiple, realistic values.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<h2>Common misinterpretations and how I avoid them<\/h2>\n\n<p>I don't blindly rely on estimates <strong>Costs<\/strong>, if the actual number of rows differs significantly. Likewise, I don't jump to conclusions based on \u201etime to first row\u201c if \u201etime to last row\u201c accounts for the bulk of the processing time <strong>carries<\/strong>. A fast start isn't much use if sorting or joins end up dominating the execution. I also thoroughly check loops, because they often hide an inefficient join or a subquery that runs for each row. Only when the execution plan, performance metrics, and data distribution all align do I make changes <strong>Things<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Special Cases: CTEs, Derived Tables, Partitions<\/h2>\n\n<p>Common Table Expressions (CTEs) and derived tables can be materialized or merged. In TREE, I recognize materialization as a separate construction step. This is beneficial when the subquery is used multiple times or is expensive to compute. If CTEs are used only once and are selective, a merge is often more efficient because it eliminates the need for additional storage operations. I monitor whether \u201etime to first row\u201c increases significantly\u2014if so, the materialization may be excessive.<\/p>\n<p>Partitioned tables are helpful with large data sets when the predicate clearly delimits the partitions. I check the execution plan to see if pruning is taking effect (only a few partitions are scanned). If it isn\u2019t, the cost is distributed across all partitions\u2014an indication that you should adjust the partitioning keys to match the most common filters or reformulate the query to enable pruning.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Briefly summarized<\/h2>\n\n<p>With EXPLAIN ANALYZE, I make MySQL execution plans quantifiable and identify hotspots, which I then use to <strong>Indices<\/strong>, query rewriting, and current statistics. I focus on discrepancies between estimated and actual row counts, the times to the first and last rows, and the <strong>Loops<\/strong>. From this, I derive a few effective steps and recheck each result using EXPLAIN ANALYZE. Over time, I begin to recognize patterns immediately and implement appropriate measures more quickly. This is how I improve the <strong>Performance<\/strong> reliable and keep queries stable over the long term.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Learn how to use MySQL EXPLAIN ANALYZE to understand execution plans and optimize your SQL queries using the keyword \"mysql explain analyze.\".<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":21003,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[781],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21010","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-datenbanken-administration-anleitungen"],"acf":[],"_wp_attached_file":null,"_wp_attachment_metadata":null,"litespeed-optimize-size":null,"litespeed-optimize-set":null,"_elementor_source_image_hash":null,"_wp_attachment_image_alt":null,"stockpack_author_name":null,"stockpack_author_url":null,"stockpack_provider":null,"stockpack_image_url":null,"stockpack_license":null,"stockpack_license_url":null,"stockpack_modification":null,"color":null,"original_id":null,"original_url":null,"original_link":null,"unsplash_location":null,"unsplash_sponsor":null,"unsplash_exif":null,"unsplash_attachment_metadata":null,"_elementor_is_screenshot":null,"surfer_file_name":null,"surfer_file_original_url":null,"envato_tk_source_kit":null,"envato_tk_source_index":null,"envato_tk_manifest":null,"envato_tk_folder_name":null,"envato_tk_builder":null,"envato_elements_download_event":null,"_menu_item_type":null,"_menu_item_menu_item_parent":null,"_menu_item_object_id":null,"_menu_item_object":null,"_menu_item_target":null,"_menu_item_classes":null,"_menu_item_xfn":null,"_menu_item_url":null,"_trp_menu_languages":null,"rank_math_primary_category":null,"rank_math_title":null,"inline_featured_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":null,"rank_math_schema_blogposting":null,"rank_math_schema_videoobject":null,"_oembed_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_oembed_time_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":null,"_yoast_wpseo_linkdex":null,"_oembed_27e3473bf8bec795fbeb3a9d38489348":null,"_oembed_c3b0f6959478faf92a1f343d8f96b19e":null,"_trp_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_desired_post_slug":null,"_yoast_wpseo_title":null,"tldname":null,"tldpreis":null,"tldrubrik":null,"tldpolicylink":null,"tldsize":null,"tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"tldtransfer":null,"tldwhoisprivacy":null,"tldregistrarchange":null,"tldregistrantchange":null,"tldwhoisupdate":null,"tldnameserverupdate":null,"tlddeletesofort":null,"tlddeleteexpire":null,"tldumlaute":null,"tldrestore":null,"tldsubcategory":null,"tldbildname":null,"tldbildurl":null,"tldclean":null,"tldcategory":null,"tldpolicy":null,"tldbesonderheiten":null,"tld_bedeutung":null,"_oembed_d167040d816d8f94c072940c8009f5f8":null,"_oembed_b0a0fa59ef14f8870da2c63f2027d064":null,"_oembed_4792fa4dfb2a8f09ab950a73b7f313ba":null,"_oembed_33ceb1fe54a8ab775d9410abf699878d":null,"_oembed_fd7014d14d919b45ec004937c0db9335":null,"_oembed_21a029d076783ec3e8042698c351bd7e":null,"_oembed_be5ea8a0c7b18e658f08cc571a909452":null,"_oembed_a9ca7a298b19f9b48ec5914e010294d2":null,"_oembed_f8db6b27d08a2bb1f920e7647808899a":null,"_oembed_168ebde5096e77d8a89326519af9e022":null,"_oembed_cdb76f1b345b42743edfe25481b6f98f":null,"_oembed_87b0613611ae54e86e8864265404b0a1":null,"_oembed_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_oembed_time_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_tldname":null,"_tldclean":null,"_tldpreis":null,"_tldcategory":null,"_tldsubcategory":null,"_tldpolicy":null,"_tldpolicylink":null,"_tldsize":null,"_tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"_tldtransfer":null,"_tldwhoisprivacy":null,"_tldregistrarchange":null,"_tldregistrantchange":null,"_tldwhoisupdate":null,"_tldnameserverupdate":null,"_tlddeletesofort":null,"_tlddeleteexpire":null,"_tldumlaute":null,"_tldrestore":null,"_tldbildname":null,"_tldbildurl":null,"_tld_bedeutung":null,"_tldbesonderheiten":null,"_oembed_ad96e4112edb9f8ffa35731d4098bc6b":null,"_oembed_8357e2b8a2575c74ed5978f262a10126":null,"_oembed_3d5fea5103dd0d22ec5d6a33eff7f863":null,"_eael_widget_elements":null,"_oembed_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_oembed_time_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_aioseo_description":null,"_eb_attr":null,"_eb_data_table":null,"_oembed_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_oembed_time_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_acf_changed":null,"_wpcode_auto_insert":null,"_edit_last":null,"_edit_lock":null,"_oembed_e7b913c6c84084ed9702cb4feb012ddd":null,"_oembed_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_time_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"_oembed_time_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"rank_math_news_sitemap_robots":null,"rank_math_robots":null,"_eael_post_view_count":"123","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ru_ru":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_et":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lv":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fr_fr":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_old_slug":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_da_dk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pl_pl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_es_es":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_hu_hu":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fi":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ja":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lt_lt":null,"_elementor_edit_mode":null,"_elementor_template_type":null,"_elementor_version":null,"_elementor_pro_version":null,"_wp_page_template":null,"_elementor_page_settings":null,"_elementor_data":null,"_elementor_css":null,"_elementor_conditions":null,"_happyaddons_elements_cache":null,"_oembed_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_time_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_time_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_time_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_time_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_oembed_time_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_elementor_screenshot":null,"_oembed_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_oembed_time_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_elementor_controls_usage":null,"_elementor_page_assets":[],"_elementor_screenshot_failed":null,"theplus_transient_widgets":null,"_eael_custom_js":null,"_wp_old_date":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_it_it":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_pt":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_zh_cn":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_nl_nl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_br":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sv_se":null,"rank_math_analytic_object_id":null,"rank_math_internal_links_processed":"1","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ro_ro":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sk_sk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_bg_bg":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sl_si":null,"litespeed_vpi_list":null,"litespeed_vpi_list_mobile":null,"rank_math_seo_score":null,"rank_math_contentai_score":null,"ilj_limitincominglinks":null,"ilj_maxincominglinks":null,"ilj_limitoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_maxoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_limitlinksperparagraph":null,"ilj_linksperparagraph":null,"ilj_blacklistdefinition":null,"ilj_linkdefinition":null,"_eb_reusable_block_ids":null,"rank_math_focus_keyword":"mysql explain","rank_math_og_content_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_content_score":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskeywords":null,"_yoast_wpseo_keywordsynonyms":null,"_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":null,"rank_math_description":null,"surfer_last_post_update":null,"surfer_last_post_update_direction":null,"surfer_keywords":null,"surfer_location":null,"surfer_draft_id":null,"surfer_permalink_hash":null,"surfer_scrape_ready":null,"_thumbnail_id":"21003","footnotes":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21010","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21010"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21010\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21003"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21010"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21010"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21010"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}