{"id":21215,"date":"2026-08-31T18:19:53","date_gmt":"2026-08-31T16:19:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/tcp-time-wait-optimierung-webserver-performance-netzwerk\/"},"modified":"2026-08-31T18:19:53","modified_gmt":"2026-08-31T16:19:53","slug":"tcp-time-wait-optimization-web-server-performance-network","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/tcp-time-wait-optimierung-webserver-performance-netzwerk\/","title":{"rendered":"TCP TIME_WAIT Optimization on Web Servers: A Practical Guide for Administrators"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I show how I <strong>TCP TIME_WAIT<\/strong> Configure web servers so that high short-term loads do not exhaust ports and new connections start quickly. This practical guide provides clear metrics, safe kernel options, application-level socket optimization, and architectural techniques that preserve TIME_WAIT as a useful safety net while simultaneously increasing throughput.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Key points<\/h2>\n<p>The following key points provide a step-by-step guide to analyzing and optimizing TIME_WAIT on Linux web servers.<\/p>\n<ul>\n  <li><strong>Understand<\/strong>: TIME_WAIT protects data integrity; the goal is control rather than shutdown.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>trade fairs<\/strong>: Accurately track the TIME_WAIT percentage, port utilization, and reconnection rates.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Kernel<\/strong>: Adjust ip_local_port_range, tcp_fin_timeout, and tcp_tw_reuse carefully and in measurable increments.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Sockets<\/strong>: Keep-Alive, HTTP\/2\/3, and connection pools reduce connection churn.<\/li>\n  <li><strong>Architecture<\/strong>: Scaling, additional IP addresses\/ports, and proxies distribute the TIME_WAIT load.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/serverraum-optimierung-1423.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Understanding the TIME_WAIT State<\/h2>\n\n<p>Many admins see thousands of connections in <strong>TIME_WAIT<\/strong> and assume it\u2019s a bug, but the exact opposite is true. This state temporarily holds deleted connections so that late segments don\u2019t interfere with new connections and all bytes reach their recipients. I respect this safety mechanism, as it prevents data mix-ups and confusing RSTs. On heavily trafficked web servers, the number of short-lived sockets naturally increases, which calls for careful evaluation rather than panic. The key factor remains whether port shortages, backlog overflows, or user errors are actually occurring before I initiate any tuning.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Identifying Symptoms on Overloaded Servers<\/h2>\n\n<p>I first check the <strong>Port<\/strong>-Error messages such as \u201eCannot assign requested address\u201c or \u201eAddress already in use\u201c indicate exhaustion. Delayed handshakes, sporadic rejections, and kernel CPU spikes along the network path are further warning signs. If monitoring reveals an unusually high number of TIME_WAIT sockets, I always compare this figure with new connection rates and response times. A high proportion of TIME_WAIT states alone remains tolerable as long as free ephemeral ports and the socket tables provide sufficient headroom. Only when concrete bottlenecks arise do I adjust parameters in a targeted manner rather than acting on suspicion.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Monitoring and Evaluation: Overview of States and Ports<\/h2>\n\n<p>I don't optimize anything without numbers, so I'll start with <strong>ss<\/strong> and Netstat to track state distributions and trends. I also take a look at \/proc\/net\/tcp, because it provides details on local and remote ports and states. From this monitoring, I extract TIME_WAIT counts per host, new connections per second, and error rates per minute. I\u2019m interested in the ratio of TIME_WAIT to total sockets and in the utilization of ephemeral ports to distinguish real pressure from mere appearances. Only when these metrics confirm bottlenecks do I plan specific kernel and application actions.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/tcp_timewait_optimierung_1234.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Kernel Tuning: Safe Adjustments with a Sense of Proportion<\/h2>\n\n<p>I start with <strong>conservative<\/strong> Make changes and roll them out gradually, always accompanied by monitoring and a fallback option. An expanded `ip_local_port_range` increases the selection of source ports, which reduces port collisions. A cautious reduction of `tcp_fin_timeout` shortens certain end states without risking premature terminations. In NAT-free setups, `tcp_tw_reuse` can noticeably reduce port pressure, provided I am familiar with the environment and tests run smoothly. A sufficiently high `tcp_max_tw_buckets` setting prevents aggressive discard, but must be appropriate for the available RAM capacity.<\/p>\n\n<table>\n  <thead>\n    <tr>\n      <th><strong>Parameters<\/strong><\/th>\n      <th><strong>Purpose<\/strong><\/th>\n      <th><strong>Example value<\/strong><\/th>\n      <th><strong>Risk<\/strong><\/th>\n      <th><strong>Measured variable<\/strong><\/th>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/thead>\n  <tbody>\n    <tr>\n      <td>net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range<\/td>\n      <td>Expand the ephemeral port pool<\/td>\n      <td>12000 65535<\/td>\n      <td>More open <strong>Ports<\/strong> consume kernel resources<\/td>\n      <td>Open Ports, Connection Errors<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout<\/td>\n      <td>Reduce the duration of FIN phases<\/td>\n      <td>30\u201345 seconds<\/td>\n      <td>Values that are too low can lead to abortions<\/td>\n      <td>Retransmissions, RST Ratio<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse<\/td>\n      <td>Reusing TIME_WAIT Sockets<\/td>\n      <td>1 (selective)<\/td>\n      <td>Risky in NAT environments<\/td>\n      <td>TIME_WAIT Percentage, Error Rates<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>net.ipv4.tcp_max_tw_buckets<\/td>\n      <td>Maximum number of TIME_WAIT sockets<\/td>\n      <td>High, appropriate value<\/td>\n      <td>Too small causes distortions<\/td>\n      <td>Kernel drops, RSTs<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n    <tr>\n      <td>Deprecated options (e.g., tcp_tw_recycle)<\/td>\n      <td>Old, problematic behavior<\/td>\n      <td>Leave it disabled<\/td>\n      <td>NAT Blockages and Legitimate Connection Errors<\/td>\n      <td>A Series of Errors, Client Complaints<\/td>\n    <\/tr>\n  <\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n<h2>Best Practices for Making Changes to the Network Stack<\/h2>\n\n<p>I change only a few at a time <strong>Parameters<\/strong>, so that I can clearly identify cause and effect. I start by defining clear goals, such as no port exhaustion, acceptable TIME_WAIT counts, and consistent latency values. Every change is first deployed to test systems with realistic load patterns and controlled rollback plans. During the rollout, I correlate network and application metrics, because only their interaction accurately reflects the user experience. Only when the metrics demonstrate consistent performance across multiple load phases do I implement the settings permanently.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/tcp-time-wait-optimization-guide-4829.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Socket Optimization at the Application Level<\/h2>\n\n<p>I often find the greatest relief through <strong>Keep-Alive<\/strong> and connection reuse, because fewer new connections also result in fewer TIME_WAIT states. I enable HTTP Keep-Alive and set appropriate idle times so that a small number of long-lived connections can handle many requests. Where appropriate, I use HTTP\/2 or HTTP\/3 to multiplex multiple requests over a few connections. For backend clients, I work with connection pools that keep connections open and renew them carefully. My reference to <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/http-connection-reuse-keepalive-optimization-serverperf-boost\/\">HTTP Keep-Alive<\/a>, which I consistently use for web services.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Architectural decisions that mitigate TIME_WAIT<\/h2>\n\n<p>I distribute the load horizontally so that <strong>TIME_WAIT<\/strong> are not concentrated on a single host and ports become scarce. More IP addresses or additional listening ports increase the number of possible source\/destination combinations and reduce collisions. Reverse proxies in front of the origin bundle client connections and communicate efficiently with pooled backends internally. It remains crucial to coordinate timeout values so that proxies, load balancers, and backends do not terminate connections prematurely. Users of Apache should <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/optimizing-the-apache-keepalive-timeout-a-performance-focus\/\">Keep-Alive Timeout<\/a> Carefully adapt to traffic patterns and latencies.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Choosing a Hosting Provider and Server with TIME_WAIT in Mind<\/h2>\n\n<p>I prefer providers with up-to-date <strong>Linux<\/strong>-Kernel, because modern TCP features make day-to-day operations easier. Granular control over sysctl parameters saves time during analysis and deployment. Integrated monitoring of network and socket states speeds up the assessment process after changes. For services with many short-lived connections, it\u2019s worth investing in high-performance hardware and a network that can handle peak loads with ease. That\u2019s how I not only implement TIME_WAIT optimizations but also keep them running reliably in production.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Practical Guide: API Servers Under Short-Term Load<\/h2>\n\n<p>I'll start with a measurement lap and record <strong>New Connections<\/strong> per second, the TIME_WAIT percentage, and error rates. Then I widen the ip_local_port_range and carefully lower the tcp_fin_timeout while monitoring retransmissions. In a NAT-free environment, I enable tcp_tw_reuse on a trial basis, document the results, and respond immediately to any anomalies. At the same time, I ensure that Keep-Alive is enabled, HTTP\/2 is running, and the application is using connection pools properly. Finally, I review TIME_WAIT trends across multiple peak periods before finalizing the settings.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/tcp_timewait_optimierung_5238.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Monitoring and Day-to-Day Operations<\/h2>\n\n<p>I document every <strong>Amendment<\/strong> with the initial value, target, and observed effect, so I can quickly verify the results later. Change processes with a clear rollback strategy protect against long-term damage in the event of mistakes. In addition to TIME_WAIT, I track RTT, retransmissions, goodput, and error rates to get a complete picture of the user experience. For long-running backend connections, I maintain <a href=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/tcp-keepalive-settings-hosting-optimization-serverboost\/\">TCP Keepalive<\/a> consistently, so that dead ends disappear and resources remain available. This is how I support optimization efforts on a day-to-day basis, rather than treating them as a one-time effort.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Who is responsible for TIME_WAIT? Active vs. passive closure<\/h2>\n<p>I always check which side actively closes the connection, because the side that actively closes it typically ends up in <strong>TIME_WAIT<\/strong>. With traditional web clients, the client often closes the connection, so the server sees fewer TIME_WAIT states\u2014with backend calls, however, my application itself acts as the client and accumulates TIME_WAIT states. I avoid forced active closing on the server (e.g., SO_LINGER=0) because this can trigger RSTs and result in data loss. Instead, I rely on <em>graceful close<\/em>, set reasonable keep-alive timeouts, and, whenever possible, let the client close the connection first. This not only reduces the TIME_WAIT state on the server but also minimizes errors caused by premature terminations. When I establish many outbound connections (e.g., to databases or upstream servers), effective connection reuse has a more immediate impact than any kernel tuning.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Sizing List and Accept Queues Correctly<\/h2>\n<p>I make sure that incoming connections don't fail before they reach the application. To do this, I adjust <strong>net.core.somaxconn<\/strong> and the backlog values of my web server so that the accept queue doesn't overflow. <strong>net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog<\/strong> I set the size based on the peak of the incoming handshakes; values that are too small result in drops as early as the SYN phase. <strong>tcp_syncookies<\/strong> I keep it enabled to ensure robustness during short-term traffic spikes, but I run load tests to verify that legitimate traffic isn't slowed down. When I use multiple workers, I set <strong>SO_REUSEPORT<\/strong>, to distribute the load evenly across CPU cores and reduce Accept lock contention. These measures do not resolve port scarcity, but they prevent misinterpretations when rejections are mistakenly attributed to TIME_WAIT.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/tcp_timewait_optimierung_3492.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Keeping an Eye on NAT, Load Balancers, and Conntrack<\/h2>\n<p>I make a strict distinction between host and edge issues. Behind an SNAT or Cloud NAT, it is not only the server but also the NAT gateway with its <em>outgoing<\/em> Ephemeral ports become a bottleneck. In such scenarios, I alleviate the pressure by adding more egress IPs, refining port distribution, or reducing reconnection rates across pools. On Linux edge devices, I check <strong>nf_conntrack_max<\/strong> and the TCP timeouts in Conntrack; keeping tracking entries for TIME_WAIT-like states for too long ties up memory and can displace legitimate flows. I lower Conntrack timeouts only cautiously and always in conjunction with application and kernel values, so that I don\u2019t cut off late segments. Important: <strong>tcp_tw_reuse<\/strong> applies only to outgoing connections from the host, not to incoming connections at the listener, and sets <strong>tcp_timestamps=1<\/strong> That said\u2014I therefore test NAT environments particularly thoroughly.<\/p>\n\n<h2>HTTP\/3 and UDP: What's Changing?<\/h2>\n<p>With HTTP\/3, the transport switches to <strong>QUIC\/UDP<\/strong>, which eliminates the need for the classic TCP TIME_WAIT state. I therefore take a different approach: Instead of monitoring TCP states, I monitor UDP socket counts, ephemeral port utilization, and Conntrack entries for UDP. QUIC significantly lowers connection establishment costs and reduces connection churn, but requires consistent idle timeouts between the client, proxy, and origin. In mixed environments (H2\/H3), I ensure that keep-alive policies remain consistent so that the benefits of multiplexing are not negated by idle timers that are set too short.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Resource Limits and Operating System Limitations<\/h2>\n<p>First, I'll lay a solid foundation <strong>File Descriptor Limits<\/strong> (ulimit nofile, fs.file-max, fs.nr_open), because limits that are too tight cause secondary errors that TIME_WAIT merely masks. The TCP memory limits (<strong>net.ipv4.tcp_mem<\/strong>, <strong>tcp_rmem<\/strong>, <strong>tcp_wmem<\/strong>) I configure it so that the stack doesn't experience memory pressure when there are many simultaneous connections. For clearly separated service ports, I consider <strong>ip_local_reserved_ports<\/strong> up to date, so that ephemeral ports do not accidentally conflict with server ports. In load tests, I check whether slab growth (e.g., for TCP control blocks) remains stable\u2014this is the only way I can assess whether a higher `tcp_max_tw_buckets` value is actually viable.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Container and Kubernetes Specifics<\/h2>\n<p>In containers, I take into account that ephemeral port ranges, ulimits, and sysctls per <em>Namespace<\/em> may vary. Service meshes and sidecars often double the number of connections (client\u2194sidecar\u2194proxy\u2194backend) and thus the potential for TIME_WAIT\u2014this is where I gain the most from connection reuse and coordinated idle timers. NodePorts and SNAT on workers place an additional load on the conntrack tables; I monitor these values separately from the pod host. Under load, I distribute egress traffic across multiple nodes or use dedicated egress gateways to avoid port hotspots. It\u2019s important to remember: If I tune the pod, the host network (including NAT\/Conntrack) must be configured accordingly; otherwise, I\u2019m just shifting the problem elsewhere.<\/p>\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\n  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/serverraum-optimierung-4721.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\"\/>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n<h2>Diagnostic Playbook and Useful Guidelines<\/h2>\n<p>To quickly assess the situation, I follow a set sequence: First, <em>ss -s<\/em> and <em>ss -tan state time-wait<\/em> Regarding the order of magnitude, secondly <em>\/proc\/sys\/net\/ipv4\/ip_local_port_range<\/em> Check and estimate available ephemeral ports; third, cross-check error messages and RST rates in the app and kernel logs. Then I measure new connections per second and correlate them with latencies. As a rule of thumb, I tolerate high TIME_WAIT proportions as long as: no port exhaustion occurs, no accept queues overflow, retransmissions remain stable, and response times do not drift. I do not consider an optimization \u201ecomplete\u201c until the same load peaks can be run reproducibly over several days without any anomalies.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Common mistakes and anti-patterns<\/h2>\n\n<p>I avoid blanket shutdowns of <strong>TIME_WAIT<\/strong>, because doing so risks data corruption and sporadic errors. Blindly lowering timeouts penalizes users with connection drops under heavy load. I leave outdated options like `tcp_tw_recycle` untouched because they can interrupt legitimate access. Pure kernel tuning without app and architecture work is of little use if too many short-lived connections are created. Changing everything at once hinders a clear root cause analysis and prolongs the debugging process.<\/p>\n\n<h2>Compact summary for admins<\/h2>\n\n<p>I treat <strong>TIME_WAIT<\/strong> As a safeguard, I measure carefully first and then optimize incrementally. I achieve the greatest impact with connection reuse via Keep-Alive, HTTP\/2\/3, and pools, supplemented by careful sysctl adjustments. Architectural components such as additional IP addresses, proxies, and horizontal scaling effectively distribute the connection load. Ongoing monitoring, thorough documentation, and clear goals ensure consistent latencies and available ports. This keeps the web server responsive even under heavy traffic, while TIME_WAIT operates in a controlled and predictable manner.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Discover how to safely optimize the TCP time_wait state on heavily loaded web servers and prevent port exhaustion through targeted Linux and socket optimization.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":21208,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[676],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-server_vm"],"acf":[],"_wp_attached_file":null,"_wp_attachment_metadata":null,"litespeed-optimize-size":null,"litespeed-optimize-set":null,"_elementor_source_image_hash":null,"_wp_attachment_image_alt":null,"stockpack_author_name":null,"stockpack_author_url":null,"stockpack_provider":null,"stockpack_image_url":null,"stockpack_license":null,"stockpack_license_url":null,"stockpack_modification":null,"color":null,"original_id":null,"original_url":null,"original_link":null,"unsplash_location":null,"unsplash_sponsor":null,"unsplash_exif":null,"unsplash_attachment_metadata":null,"_elementor_is_screenshot":null,"surfer_file_name":null,"surfer_file_original_url":null,"envato_tk_source_kit":null,"envato_tk_source_index":null,"envato_tk_manifest":null,"envato_tk_folder_name":null,"envato_tk_builder":null,"envato_elements_download_event":null,"_menu_item_type":null,"_menu_item_menu_item_parent":null,"_menu_item_object_id":null,"_menu_item_object":null,"_menu_item_target":null,"_menu_item_classes":null,"_menu_item_xfn":null,"_menu_item_url":null,"_trp_menu_languages":null,"rank_math_primary_category":null,"rank_math_title":null,"inline_featured_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":null,"rank_math_schema_blogposting":null,"rank_math_schema_videoobject":null,"_oembed_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_oembed_time_049c719bc4a9f89deaead66a7da9fddc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":null,"_yoast_wpseo_linkdex":null,"_oembed_27e3473bf8bec795fbeb3a9d38489348":null,"_oembed_c3b0f6959478faf92a1f343d8f96b19e":null,"_trp_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_desired_post_slug":null,"_yoast_wpseo_title":null,"tldname":null,"tldpreis":null,"tldrubrik":null,"tldpolicylink":null,"tldsize":null,"tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"tldtransfer":null,"tldwhoisprivacy":null,"tldregistrarchange":null,"tldregistrantchange":null,"tldwhoisupdate":null,"tldnameserverupdate":null,"tlddeletesofort":null,"tlddeleteexpire":null,"tldumlaute":null,"tldrestore":null,"tldsubcategory":null,"tldbildname":null,"tldbildurl":null,"tldclean":null,"tldcategory":null,"tldpolicy":null,"tldbesonderheiten":null,"tld_bedeutung":null,"_oembed_d167040d816d8f94c072940c8009f5f8":null,"_oembed_b0a0fa59ef14f8870da2c63f2027d064":null,"_oembed_4792fa4dfb2a8f09ab950a73b7f313ba":null,"_oembed_33ceb1fe54a8ab775d9410abf699878d":null,"_oembed_fd7014d14d919b45ec004937c0db9335":null,"_oembed_21a029d076783ec3e8042698c351bd7e":null,"_oembed_be5ea8a0c7b18e658f08cc571a909452":null,"_oembed_a9ca7a298b19f9b48ec5914e010294d2":null,"_oembed_f8db6b27d08a2bb1f920e7647808899a":null,"_oembed_168ebde5096e77d8a89326519af9e022":null,"_oembed_cdb76f1b345b42743edfe25481b6f98f":null,"_oembed_87b0613611ae54e86e8864265404b0a1":null,"_oembed_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_oembed_time_27aa0e5cf3f1bb4bc416a4641a5ac273":null,"_tldname":null,"_tldclean":null,"_tldpreis":null,"_tldcategory":null,"_tldsubcategory":null,"_tldpolicy":null,"_tldpolicylink":null,"_tldsize":null,"_tldregistrierungsdauer":null,"_tldtransfer":null,"_tldwhoisprivacy":null,"_tldregistrarchange":null,"_tldregistrantchange":null,"_tldwhoisupdate":null,"_tldnameserverupdate":null,"_tlddeletesofort":null,"_tlddeleteexpire":null,"_tldumlaute":null,"_tldrestore":null,"_tldbildname":null,"_tldbildurl":null,"_tld_bedeutung":null,"_tldbesonderheiten":null,"_oembed_ad96e4112edb9f8ffa35731d4098bc6b":null,"_oembed_8357e2b8a2575c74ed5978f262a10126":null,"_oembed_3d5fea5103dd0d22ec5d6a33eff7f863":null,"_eael_widget_elements":null,"_oembed_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_oembed_time_0d8a206f09633e3d62b95a15a4dd0487":null,"_aioseo_description":null,"_eb_attr":null,"_eb_data_table":null,"_oembed_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_oembed_time_819a879e7da16dd629cfd15a97334c8a":null,"_acf_changed":null,"_wpcode_auto_insert":null,"_edit_last":null,"_edit_lock":null,"_oembed_e7b913c6c84084ed9702cb4feb012ddd":null,"_oembed_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_time_bfde9e10f59a17b85fc8917fa7edf782":null,"_oembed_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"_oembed_time_03514b67990db061d7c4672de26dc514":null,"rank_math_news_sitemap_robots":null,"rank_math_robots":null,"_eael_post_view_count":"182","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ru_ru":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_et":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lv":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fr_fr":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_en_us":null,"_wp_old_slug":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_da_dk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pl_pl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_es_es":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_hu_hu":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_fi":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ja":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_lt_lt":null,"_elementor_edit_mode":null,"_elementor_template_type":null,"_elementor_version":null,"_elementor_pro_version":null,"_wp_page_template":null,"_elementor_page_settings":null,"_elementor_data":null,"_elementor_css":null,"_elementor_conditions":null,"_happyaddons_elements_cache":null,"_oembed_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_time_75446120c39305f0da0ccd147f6de9cb":null,"_oembed_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_time_3efb2c3e76a18143e7207993a2a6939a":null,"_oembed_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_time_59808117857ddf57e478a31d79f76e4d":null,"_oembed_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_time_965c5b49aa8d22ce37dfb3bde0268600":null,"_oembed_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_oembed_time_81002f7ee3604f645db4ebcfd1912acf":null,"_elementor_screenshot":null,"_oembed_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_oembed_time_7ea3429961cf98fa85da9747683af827":null,"_elementor_controls_usage":null,"_elementor_page_assets":[],"_elementor_screenshot_failed":null,"theplus_transient_widgets":null,"_eael_custom_js":null,"_wp_old_date":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_it_it":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_pt":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_zh_cn":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_nl_nl":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_pt_br":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sv_se":null,"rank_math_analytic_object_id":null,"rank_math_internal_links_processed":"1","_trp_automatically_translated_slug_ro_ro":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sk_sk":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_bg_bg":null,"_trp_automatically_translated_slug_sl_si":null,"litespeed_vpi_list":null,"litespeed_vpi_list_mobile":null,"rank_math_seo_score":null,"rank_math_contentai_score":null,"ilj_limitincominglinks":null,"ilj_maxincominglinks":null,"ilj_limitoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_maxoutgoinglinks":null,"ilj_limitlinksperparagraph":null,"ilj_linksperparagraph":null,"ilj_blacklistdefinition":null,"ilj_linkdefinition":null,"_eb_reusable_block_ids":null,"rank_math_focus_keyword":"TCP TIME_WAIT","rank_math_og_content_image":null,"_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":null,"_yoast_wpseo_content_score":null,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskeywords":null,"_yoast_wpseo_keywordsynonyms":null,"_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes":null,"rank_math_description":null,"surfer_last_post_update":null,"surfer_last_post_update_direction":null,"surfer_keywords":null,"surfer_location":null,"surfer_draft_id":null,"surfer_permalink_hash":null,"surfer_scrape_ready":null,"_thumbnail_id":"21208","footnotes":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21215"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21215\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21208"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/webhosting.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}