Skip to content 
All-Inkl vs Strato in 2025 will be decided primarily by speed, convenience and reliable service for WordPress - not by marketing promises. I'll show you clearly which host delivers which strengths, where the limits lie and how you can make the best choice for your project.
Key points
The following key aspects will give you a quick orientation for your decision.
- PerformanceAll-Inkl consistently fast, Strato solid for small projects.
- FunctionsAll-Inkl with strong inclusive services, Strato with basic tools.
- PriceStrato very cheap at the start, All-Inkl fair in the long term.
- SupportAll-Inkl 24/7 German-speaking, Strato limited in time.
- ScalingAll-Inkl resilient to growth, Strato more for low traffic.
WordPress standards 2025: What I expect
For a WordPressproject, I count on short loading times, automatic backups and one-click installation. SSD storage is a must, as is SSL for every domain at no extra cost. I make sure that staging, caching and updates really simplify everyday life. Security is a must: DDoS protection, malware scans and clean isolation between projects provide peace of mind. With growing traffic, performance must not collapse, so I check limits and upgrade paths carefully.
Comparison at a glance: Packages and features
The table summarizes the most visible differences and shows where All-Inkl and Strato in relation to a specialized provider. All-Inkl scores with several inclusive domains, free certificates and daily data backups. Strato attracts customers with a very low entry price, but offers fewer WordPress convenience functions. There is a noticeable gap in the depth of support, which is noticeable in everyday life. Those who prioritize performance and WordPress convenience will quickly recognize the alternatives here. I always understand prices to include later regular prices, not just in the starting year.
| Provider | WordPress optimized | Domains included | SSD memory | SSL certificates | Backups | WordPress Support | Price entry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| webhoster.de | Yes | 5 | Yes | Free of charge | Daily | Specialized | from 2,99 € |
| All-Inkl | Yes | 3-5 | Yes | Free of charge | Daily | Web hosting expertise | from 4,95 € |
| Strato | No (general hosting) | 1-3 | Yes | Free of charge | Automatic | Standard | from 1,00 € |
All-Inkl in use: strengths and limitations
All-Inkl delivers a very well-rounded package for me with several Domains from the basic tariff, free SSL and SSD storage. The one-click installation works cleanly, updates run reliably and daily backups take the pressure out of everyday life. Conveniences such as staging and server-side caching are available, but are not on a par with specialist hosters. Those who maintain several projects or customer websites will benefit from the inclusive services and clear administration. For beginners, it is worth taking a look at this short guide: All-Inkl WordPress Guide.
Strato in everyday life: For whom it suits
Strato is suitable for small Websitesblogs and landing pages that start with a small budget. Starting at €1 for the first year is attractive, after that you should plan on paying the regular prices. The 1-click installation runs quickly, but does not extend WordPress with in-depth convenience functions such as staging. The limits of performance become apparent with heavy traffic or many plugins. If you want to simplify the start, it is best to use the Strato Auto-Installer.
Performance and scaling: measurable differences
In addition to SSD, speed also counts for CachingPHP version, CPU allocation and RAM per process. All-Inkl handles load peaks noticeably better and remains fast with many simultaneous calls. Strato delivers decent times for small projects, but response times can increase during peaks. Anyone using advertising, store functions or page builders will quickly notice the reserves of a hoster. I therefore always check what upgrade paths look like and whether limits are documented transparently.
Technical limits and resources: what I specifically look out for
In practice, performance depends on details: how many simultaneous PHP processes are permitted, which Memory limit is set, and how fast is the I/O performance of the storage layer? All-Inkl is usually more generous here and maintains more stable response times when several users trigger page requests in parallel or a page builder generates a lot of PHP work. Strato limits more conservatively, which is completely sufficient for small sites, but forms the bottleneck for more complex themes, builders and WooCommerce. Another point is the Process isolationCleanly separated accounts prevent neighbors on the same server from slowing down your app. In practice, this pays off in more consistent measured values.
I also recommend using the PHP version and keep them up to date - more modern versions deliver noticeably higher throughput. Both providers make this possible, but All-Inkl often rolls out updates faster. If you use image galleries, slider tools or extensive forms, you will also benefit from server-side compression setup and Brotli/Gzip. If your project relies heavily on dynamic content (search, filters, user accounts), check whether Object caching makes sense. Server-side offerings are limited; a lean plugin setup with a targeted cache plugin remains the pragmatic solution for both.
Developer workflow and tools
A professional workflow saves me time and reduces errors. I make sure that SSHSFTP, WP-CLI and cron tasks are available. All-Inkl provides solid coverage of these basics, including reliable scheduled task handling for WordPress crons. Strato also offers the basics, but with fewer fine-tuning options. For deployment, I prefer a staging instance and clear paths for Rollbacks. All-Inkl makes these steps much easier for me, whereas with Strato I often work with manual workarounds (e.g. copying the wp-content directories and the database). If you work with child themes, Composer or build processes, you should check how much flexibility the tariff allows for temporary peaks and file system operations.
Support and operation: admin panel, help, accessibility
Good support saves me Hourswhen something gets stuck. All-Inkl responds quickly, around the clock, and solves queries in a practical manner. Strato helps until the evening on weekdays, but only to a limited extent at weekends - which is not enough for emergencies. The admin interface at All-Inkl is clearly laid out and allows me to complete tasks quickly. Strato supplements the administration with additional tools for beginners, which can be helpful when getting started.
Migration and relocation: switch without downtime
An orderly process is important when changing host. I first clone the site to the new environment, test functions (login, search, contact forms, checkout) and plan the DNS switch with a low TTL. All-Inkl makes it easy for me to use temporary subdomains and quickly reissue SSL. With Strato, the move also works, but often requires a little more manual work with paths and redirects. It is important to have backups ready so that you can roll back within minutes if necessary. I also make a note of cron jobs, caching rules and CDN integrations so that everything works seamlessly after the switch.
Anyone holding external domains should keep an eye on name server and zone management: A-Records, AAAA, CNAME and the necessary Mail entries (MX, SPF, DKIM, DMARC) must follow suit. A short downtime can usually be avoided if the test instance on the new host is already ready for production and the DNS change is prepared precisely.
E-mail and deliverability
Reliable email is also crucial when it comes to WordPress: password resets, order confirmations, contact requests. I check whether SPF, DKIM and DMARC can be set up and whether bounce handling works properly. Experience has shown that All-Inkl offers a smooth basic configuration here; Strato also provides the basis, but often requires additional fine-tuning for projects with newsletter volumes. For transactional emails from WooCommerce or forms, I prefer to use SMTP with authentication instead of PHP mail - this increases deliverability and saves me the guesswork of lost emails.
Security and backups: what matters in 2025
Safe projects need consistent Updatesdaily backups and reasonable protection mechanisms. Both providers host in Germany and provide SSL at no extra charge. All-Inkl adds malware scans and DDoS protection, which is important to me for productive sites. Strato secures automatically, but lacks certain layers of protection that require sophisticated setups. I also check how easy it is to restore backups and whether restore tests run smoothly.
Data protection and compliance
For business-critical projects, a Order processing contract as well as the hosting location in the EU. Both providers provide the necessary basis here, including clear information paths to the data center and security measures. I also make sure that log data is configured to save data and that admin access can be protected with 2FA. Anyone integrating analytics or marketing tools should also consider whether a Consent mode and cookie-free basic measurement are sufficient - this way you put less strain on performance and remain data protection compliant.
Interpreting the price structure correctly
I evaluate prices over the entire Runtimenot only in the first year. Strato scores points at the start, but after the promotional period the regular monthly costs apply. At first glance, All-Inkl seems more expensive, but it includes several domains, SSL and daily backups - which saves on additional costs. I add additional items such as additional domains, mailspace or restore fees in order to make a fair comparison. Those who plan for the long term often benefit from All-Inkl's complete package.
Cost traps and contract details
I always look at Running timesnotice periods and possible set-up fees. Even low entry-level prices are put into perspective if significantly higher amounts are incurred after twelve months. Downgrades are not always possible within the term, but upgrades usually are - this makes it more sensible to start with a smaller package, provided that the upgrade works quickly. Also note: Fees for Restorations from backups, additional mailboxes, storage extensions and possibly costs for dedicated IPs or special certificates. All-Inkl often remains more transparent here and bundles more services into the package price; with Strato, it is worth taking a closer look at the small print after the promotional phase.
Use cases in detail: WooCommerce, Page Builder, Multisite
WooCommerce generates more database and PHP load than a classic corporate site. I rely on clean Caching for catalog pages, leave shopping cart and checkout paths specifically uncached and make sure there are enough PHP resources. All-Inkl supports these setup requirements better, especially during peak loads (promotions, seasonal peaks). Strato works in a small store scenario, but I reach my limits more quickly with growth. For Page Builder (Elementor, Divi & Co.): The more widgets and effects, the more important CPU time and I/O are - this is where All-Inkl's reserve surcharge pays off. WordPress Multisite I prefer to use providers with stable resource windows, as the load of several sites is more difficult to predict.
Monitoring, uptime and error culture
I do not blindly rely on advertising promises, but use external Monitoring on: Availability, TTFB, response size, cron runs. This allows me to recognize early on if a host is throttling or if a plugin is getting out of hand. In my experience, All-Inkl responds to performance queries faster and with a more solution-oriented approach. At Strato, the response is competent, but rarely deeply technical. The decisive factor remains: How consistent are response times over the week and under load? This is where the wheat is separated from the chaff when campaigns, social traffic or organic growth occur.
Alternative for power users: Why webhoster.de is often ahead
Who Staging, Server cacheIf you want controlled PHP workers and WordPress specialists, you are often better off with a specialized provider. webhoster.de delivers high performance, flexible scaling and experienced support for tricky WordPress themes. This focus pays off for stores, magazines or international projects. Costs are often lower than expected due to optimization time savings and fewer downtimes. A compact overview of functions and providers can be found in this WordPress hosting comparison.
Brief summary 2025: My choice
For the price-conscious with a small website Strato is an easy start - provided that traffic and functional requirements remain manageable. If you run more than one site on a permanent basis, need several domains or are planning growth, you're usually better off with All-Inkl. All-Inkl impressed me with its consistent speed, clean inclusive services and helpful support. On the other hand, I prefer to set up sophisticated WordPress setups with webhoster.de, especially when staging, caching and expert help are crucial. In short: Strato for a cheap start, All-Inkl for sustainable projects, special hosters for maximum control.
