Skip to content 
Email server security will remain the backbone of secure corporate communication in 2025. Those who fail to implement modern protective measures risk attacks such as phishing, data loss or legal sanctions for violations of the GDPR.
Key points
- Multi-level securityCombination of technology, guidelines and training
- EncryptionSecure transport and content via TLS, S/MIME or OpenPGP
- Identity checkUse SPF, DKIM and DMARC against spoofing
- Regular audits: Detect vulnerabilities early with tests and monitoring
- User awareness: Safety starts with people
Clear processes and responsibilities are required in order to consistently implement the measures mentioned. This is not just about installing suitable software, but also about introducing binding guidelines throughout the organization. I draw up detailed security guidelines that are easy to understand for both administrators and employees. For example, I document how often passwords are changed, when system updates take place and in which cases external service providers are involved.
Another key aspect that I incorporate early on in my process is the topic of "zero trust". The zero-trust approach is based on the assumption that your own network could be compromised. For email servers, this means designing access in such a way that even internal connections do not take place without clear authentication and identity verification. This considerably strengthens the overall architecture and makes lateral movement more difficult for attackers.
Authentication: making access secure
Access to e-mail servers must never be uncontrolled. I consistently rely on Multi-factor authentication for administrators and users. This prevents unauthorized access, even with stolen access data. I also define Password guidelinesto prevent reuse and simple passwords.
Role-based assignment of rights and the use of SMTP AUTH are a useful addition to the security concept. This allows me to control exactly who accesses which services.
Useful settings can be made with these Postfix tips targeted implementation.
I also recommend logging authentication protocols in detail so that, in the event of a suspicious case, you can quickly trace who accessed the system and when. Log files in which login and logout attempts are stored help to ward off attacks and detect them at an early stage. At the same time, an alert system is useful, which informs you of unusual login activities - for example, if access data is entered incorrectly several times or unusual IP ranges are used.
You should also segment the network for server access. This means, for example, that administrative access is only permitted from certain areas or via a VPN. This means that even if an attempt is made to compromise the local network, malicious actors cannot easily reach the email server because they do not have the necessary network shares and certificates.
Implement encryption consistently
Transmitted and stored data must be accessible at all times. secured be. That's why I activate TLS for SMTP, POP3 and IMAP by default. Even simple certificates from Let's Encrypt provide a solid basis for this. For content with particularly high protection requirements, I use end-to-end processes such as OpenPGP.
These measures prevent man-in-the-middle attacks and ensure confidentiality - even with external storage or backup systems.
It is also advisable to encrypt email content on the server itself, for example with S/MIME or OpenPGP. Depending on company guidelines, employees can be instructed to send particularly sensitive correspondence exclusively in encrypted form. Another advantage is that an encrypted email is difficult for attackers to read despite compromised server structures.
Regularly checking certificates is also part of everyday life. Admins often forget to renew them in good time, which can lead to expired TLS certificates. To avoid this, I rely on automation tools that warn me in good time and ideally take over the renewal of a Let's Encrypt certificate directly.
Monitoring the TLS connections provides an insight into the effectiveness of the encryption. I check the cipher suites used, only use modern encryption methods where possible and deactivate insecure protocols such as SSLv3 or TLS 1.0. This consistent approach significantly reduces the attack surface.
Identity verification via SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Spoofing is one of the most common causes of successful phishing. I therefore rely on a complete configuration of SPF, DKIM and DMARC. This combination protects my domains and enables receiving servers to reliably recognize fraudulent senders.
The entries are published via DNS. Regular inspection and adjustment - depending on the environment - is important in order to detect misconfigurations at an early stage.
How to set up DMARC and DKIM correctly is shown step by step in the Installation guide.
These mechanisms can also be supplemented by additional anti-spam solutions that use AI-based heuristics. Such systems learn from real mail traffic and can recognize suspicious emails as soon as they arrive and move them to quarantine. The more precisely these spam filters are trained and configured, the fewer false positives are generated, which reduces administrative effort.
I also recommend using the DMARC reporting function. This provides administrators with regular reports on all emails sent on behalf of a domain and enables them to identify unauthorized senders more quickly. This not only promotes security, but also forms the basis for further fine-tuning your own email setup.
Securing mail servers and using firewalls
I open the Firewall only the necessary ports - such as 25/587 for SMTP and 993 for IMAP. Any other open port would be an invitation to potential attackers. I also use tools such as Fail2Ban to automatically block login attempts.
I use access control lists and thresholds to limit simultaneous connections, which reduces both misuse and resource overload.
I also use an intrusion detection/prevention system (IDS/IPS). This system monitors data traffic in real time and, thanks to defined rules, can stop suspicious traffic before it even reaches internal areas. Certain patterns in packets that could indicate attacks can also be recognized. As soon as the system registers something suspicious, either warnings are issued or the traffic is directly blocked. In combination with a well-configured firewall, this creates multi-layered protection that makes potential attacks more difficult at every stage.
Another aspect is the monitoring of outgoing email connections. Especially in the case of spam waves and compromised accounts, it can happen that your own server becomes a spam distributor and the IP quickly ends up on blacklists. Regular checks of your own IP address ranges in known blacklists help to identify reputation problems at an early stage and take countermeasures.
Server hardening with targeted measures
Powerful filter mechanisms strengthen protection against malware and spam. I activate greylisting and HELO/EHLO validation to reject suspicious traffic at an early stage. DNSBL and RBL lists help to automatically block known spammers.
I always deactivate open relays. I operate mail servers in very limited environments with minimal running services - for example via container or chroot.
I use targeted filtering for attachments to block unwanted file types that may contain malware.
In addition, I only assign minimal permissions at file system level. This means that each service and each user only has exactly the access rights that are required for their work. This reduces the risk that a compromised service can immediately cause extensive damage to the system. Many systems rely on Mandatory Access Control (MAC) such as AppArmor or SELinux to regulate access even more finely.
At the same time, regular security scans are an important part of server hardening. I use tools that specifically search for outdated libraries or insecure configurations. One example would be a test that checks whether unnecessary services - such as FTP or Telnet - are running. I always prevent these, as their security vulnerabilities are often exploited. Firewall settings, packet limits and process rights are also on the checklist so that I can identify any vulnerabilities before an attacker does.
Patching, monitoring and early warning systems
I follow a fixed update schedule for all components - including the operating system, mail server software and dependencies. Security vulnerabilities often arise from outdated software. For monitoring, I automate log analyses and use tools such as GoAccess or Logwatch for evaluation.
Suspicious activities - such as high SMTP usage by individual IPs - are detected at an early stage and countermeasures are initiated.
To maintain an overview, I use a central dashboard that displays the most important key figures in real time. These include, for example, the number of incoming and outgoing emails, server utilization, conspicuous login attempts and spam rates. There are also early warning systems that proactively sound the alarm if defined limits are exceeded. Ideally, I will know immediately if something unusual happens instead of having to wait days or weeks to find out from log files.
Professional monitoring also takes into account a wide range of protocols and metrics, such as CPU load, ram utilization or the connection to external databases. All of these points give me a holistic view of potential bottlenecks. After all, full memory or defective hard disks can also pose security risks if they block important processes. By integrating early warning messages into my email and messenger services, I am also able to react promptly, no matter where I am.
Data backup as the last line of defense
Data loss is always a security problem. That's why I rely on Daily backupswhich are stored decentrally and regularly tested for recoverability. I use incremental backups to reduce transfers and storage requirements.
There is also an emergency plan that clearly describes how systems can be restored in a short space of time. Without such a concept, attackers will remain successful in the long term.
I define clear roles in this emergency plan: Who is responsible for recovery, who communicates externally, and who assesses the damage? For particularly critical email instances, I keep redundant systems in standby mode, which are switched on in the event of a failure or attack and thus continue to run virtually seamlessly. I synchronize these systems at short intervals so that only a few seconds of messages are lost in the event of a failure.
I am also aware that encrypted backups require both password and key protection. I document my keys securely so that they are available in an emergency without unauthorized persons being able to access them. At the same time, I practise the recovery process from time to time to ensure that all steps are routine and that no time is lost due to unclear processes in the event of an emergency.
Raising awareness among users
Phishing attempts rely on human error. That's why I run continuous training courses. Among other things, participants learn how to recognize fake senders, unexpected links and file attachments.
I also work with them to highlight secure password selection and the handling of confidential content. Only informed users behave securely in the long term.
To make the training courses effective, I regularly carry out internal phishing tests. I send out fake emails that imitate common attack patterns. Employees who click on the links are directly confronted with an explanation, which helps them to be more careful in future. Over time, the click rate on such emails drops significantly and the security level increases sustainably.
I also rely on a continuous flow of information. When new threats emerge, I inform the team by e-mail or intranet with short, concise information. It is important that this information is not lost. Instead of sending out entire books, I offer easily digestible snacks based on the current risks. This keeps the topic of security fresh and relevant for everyone.
Proactively comply with data protection regulations
I encrypt data not only during transmission, but also during storage - including backups. Personal content is processed exclusively in accordance with the applicable GDPR provisions.
For me, transparent communication with users is just as much a part of this as a functional mailbox for providing information.
Furthermore, I adhere to the principles of data minimization. In many cases, it is not necessary to keep every e-mail inbox permanently for an indefinite period of time. I therefore create a deletion concept that defines exactly how long certain data is kept. In this way, I avoid unnecessary storage and backup costs as well as possible risks from accumulations of old, unsecured data.
Another point is the documentation of all relevant data flows. If external service providers are integrated into the email infrastructure, there are order processing contracts (AV contracts) and clear regulations on which data they are allowed to process. These written agreements provide me with proof of compliance with the GDPR requirements in this area at all times. I am therefore well equipped for any inspections or audits by the supervisory authorities.
Schedule regular safety tests
I regularly test my systems automatically and manually for vulnerabilities. Tools such as OpenVAS help me with structured analysis, while external penetration tests show me possible points of attack from the perspective of a stranger.
The resulting findings flow directly into the optimization of my security configurations.
In addition to these penetration tests, I also conduct internal security training for the admin team. We train how to use tools such as Nmap, Wireshark or special forensic programs that are useful in the event of a security incident. If everyone knows how to analyze suspicious traffic, forensically secure log files or check servers for compromises, this increases the speed of response enormously.
Another component that is often underestimated is the testing of restart procedures as part of the security tests. After a simulated compromise, it is checked whether the repair and recovery measures work smoothly. In this way, I can ensure that all those responsible are familiar with the process and do not just read through emergency instructions for the first time during a crisis. Exercises like this are time-consuming but invaluable in an emergency.
Email hosting comparison 2025
If you don't want to run your own email server, you can benefit from professional hosting. These providers offer impressive security features, service availability and legally compliant processes:
| Provider | Security | GDPR-compliant | Support | Performance | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| webhoster.de | Very good | Yes | 24/7 | Very good | 1st place |
| Provider B | Good | Yes | 24/7 | Good | 2nd place |
| Provider C | Satisfactory | Restricted | Working days | Good | 3rd place |
A clear lead is shown by webhoster.de. The combination of security features and data protection makes this provider the top choice in Germany in 2025.
However, before deciding on an external hosting offer, it is advisable to take a close look at the technologies used. Do the providers offer multi-factor authentication and state-of-the-art anti-spam filters as standard? Is there a fixed SLA that defines not only availability but also response times in the event of a security incident? Especially in the professional email sector, the reliability of support is crucial. This is the only way to rectify faults immediately before they affect business operations.
In addition, the data sovereignty factor should not be underestimated. If you rely on technologies from abroad, legal issues may arise - for example, when hosting in countries that are not subject to European data protection. You should therefore always check whether the chosen providers communicate their server locations and data protection guidelines transparently. Complete documentation of responsibilities guarantees legal certainty and creates trust.
Optimized transmission reliability with PFS
In addition to TLS, I use Perfect Forward Secrecy to retroactively render intercepted encryption sessions unusable. This prevents the decryption of historical data using compromised keys.
Instructions for quick implementation can be found in the article Activate Perfect Forward Secrecy.
In detail, PFS means that temporary session keys are generated for each new connection. Even if an attacker has recorded earlier data material, it can no longer be read later if a key falls into their hands. I rely on heavily tested cipher suites such as ECDHE, which guarantee secure key negotiation between client and server.
I also ensure that the server configuration lists outdated cipher suites and algorithms so that only modern and secure variants are used. Compatibility is also only set up for mobile clients or older systems that could still use weaker protocols if it is really absolutely necessary. It should be noted that security requirements should always take precedence over compatibility. This is the only way to maintain overall protection in the long term.
