Skip to content 
The evaluation of Postfix logs is the key to effective monitoring and diagnosis of email systems. If you analyze systematically, you can identify the causes of errors at an early stage, protect the server better against attacks and improve delivery quality in the long term. Even if the log files appear technical and confusing at first glance, their detailed structure offers a wealth of information that I would not want to be without during ongoing operations. Using simple commands or specialized tools, critical events, performance factors and even security-relevant anomalies can be quickly uncovered.
Key points
- Error messages recognize status=deferred or auth failed as warning signals
- Log storage locations and manage their rotation in a targeted manner
- Analysis with tools such as plogsumm and automate qshape
- Security events Detect in good time and initiate countermeasures
- Level of detail increase the logs if necessary, observe data protection
In practice, this means that I regularly check my log files to identify even minor discrepancies before they grow into major problems. With email servers in particular, the good reputation of your own IP addresses and therefore the delivery rates are quickly at stake. A glance at password entry errors often reveals whether a user has incorrect configurations in their email client or whether an attacker is trying to compromise accounts. By specifically monitoring these messages, I not only increase security, but also get clear indications of how reliably my mail system is working.
Evaluate Postfix logs correctly
Postfix stores all SMTP processes in log files in a structured manner - including connection processes, deliveries, delays and security incidents. By default, these end up in /var/log/mail.log or /var/log/maillog. On Unix systems with active logrotate, older files are automatically archived. They end with .1 or .gz and can be visualized with tools like zless or zcat view.
The following log files are common:
| Log file | Content |
|---|---|
| /var/log/mail.log | Standard output of all mail processes |
| /var/log/mail.err | Only errors and problems |
| /var/log/mail.warn | Warnings and suspicious behavior |
Are you looking for connection problems or login errors? Then commands like grep -i "auth failed" /var/log/mail.log to filter relevant entries in a targeted manner. Even a brief sample analysis often provides valuable information about the current status of your mail server. It is also worth keeping in mind how many connections are normally received per minute in order to quickly identify deviations.
Especially with high mail volumes - such as newsletters or larger company structures - it is advisable to set up automated evaluations in order to report anomalies directly. This saves time and allows me to identify surprising peaks in workload more quickly. Sudden increases are often caused by a wave of spam or a faulty application that is sending too many emails.
Typical log entries and their meaning
If you understand the structure and content of log lines, you can quickly classify the cause and context of errors. Status codes such as
- status=sent: The message was successfully delivered
- status=deferred: Delayed delivery, usually a temporary problem for the recipient
- status=bounced: Message finally rejected (e.g. non-existent address)
- status=reject: Dispatch was blocked by policy rules
- auth failed: Incorrect access data or attempted attack
The targeted "sifting" of certain events works efficiently with regular expressions. Example: grep -iE "auth failed|imap-login failed|smtp-login failed" /var/log/mail.log. Such targeted filters can expose patterns such as repeated login attempts by an IP, which usually indicates brute force attacks. In such cases, I check whether these are known IPs and respond with blocking rules or additional captcha solutions if a webmail account is affected.
Another key point is the investigation of domain-specific problems, such as sudden delivery errors to certain target servers. Often found in your logs status=deferred for the same domain, it is worth taking a look at the DNS and firewall settings. Sometimes the cause is beyond your control, such as maintenance work on the target server. With the log files, you are still able to point out problems to the recipient or check your own systems.
Keeping log rotation under control
So that the file mail.log does not overflow, logrotate takes over the automatic archiving at intervals - usually weekly. Parameters such as rotate 4 is used to determine how many generations are retained. Older logs then appear, for example, as mail.log.1.gz.
These archived logs can also be analyzed later. Unpack them with gunzip, read it with zcat or zless. This maintains transparency about developments in the past - for example after downtimes or security incidents. I make sure to log changed configurations during this period - this makes it easier to correlate causes and effects.
The historical analysis becomes particularly interesting when I want to evaluate a longer-term development. Are there periodic fluctuations that can be traced back to a certain time of day, a day of the week or certain campaigns? Corresponding patterns can be easily read from the archived logs and allow forward-looking planning. For example, I can see whether it is worth scheduling additional resources for a newsletter campaign at the weekend or whether my server configuration is already sufficiently powerful.
More details through targeted configuration
If the standard output is not enough for you, you can use the /etc/postfix/main.cf meaningfully increase the level of detail. Two options are particularly relevant:
- debug_peer_level=N: Increases the depth of information
- debug_peer_list=IP/Host: Restricts detailed execution to defined targets only
I use this specifically for recurring problems with certain clients. However, you should check whether sensitive user data is included that may be relevant under data protection law. In some production environments, it is advisable to only activate debug logs for a short time and then reset them again. This avoids unnecessary load on the file system and reduces the risk of inadvertently saving confidential information.
In general, it is important to me that debug settings are not permanently active to their full extent. On the one hand, this protects the user data and, on the other hand, prevents the log files from becoming unnecessarily large, which would make analysis more difficult. A clear separation between the normal operating log file and short-term debug logging has proven itself in practice.
Automatic evaluation via pflogsumm
plogsumm provides daily reports with delivery statistics, error evaluations and traffic analyses. Particularly practical: the combination with a cronjob allows you to continuously monitor the mail server - without manual intervention.
I use the following bash script for this:
#!/bin/bash
gunzip /var/log/mail.log.1.gz
MAIL=/tmp/mailstats
echo "Report from $(date "+%d.%m.%Y")" > $MAIL
echo "Mailserver activity of the last 24h" >> $MAIL
/usr/sbin/pflogsumm --problems_first /var/log/mail.log.1 >> $MAIL
cat $MAIL | mail -s "Postfix Report" [email protected]
gzip /var/log/mail.log.1
Once entered in the Crontab (crontab -e), it provides daily evaluations - reliably and comprehensibly stored. If you want to refine the reports even further, pflogsumm offers various options, such as sorting by recipient domain or sender. This makes segmentation easier, especially in environments with several thousand emails per day. I can then easily view the results and delve deeper into individual log files if necessary.
Advanced analysis techniques with grep and regex
Regular expressions can be used to formulate very specific queries. I use them to filter, among other things:
- All login errors for a specific domain:
grep -iE "auth failed|imap-login failed|smtp-login failed" /var/log/mail.log | grep "example.com" - Delays in delivery:
grep "status=deferred" /var/log/mail.log - Check queue status live:
postqueue -p
This information helps with the final diagnosis and provides clues for configuration adjustments or network analysis. I also like to monitor the total volume per day for larger mail servers. To do this, I combine grep or awk with simple counting functions to quickly find out whether the number of e-mails sent or received deviates from the usual values.
If I have a recurring message, a short snippet with grep -A or grep -B help to expand the context. For example, you can see what happened directly before or after an error message. This often saves long scrolling and makes it easier to find the cause.
Comparison of products for log evaluation
In addition to grep and pflogsumm, I also occasionally use specialized solutions. These are helpful when larger volumes, graphical interfaces or real-time displays are required.
| Tool | Function |
|---|---|
| plogsumm | Compact daily report from log files |
| qshape | Analysis of the Postfix queues |
| maillogger | Exports to CSV or JSON for further processing |
| Graylog/Kibana | Graphic processing for high volumes |
Especially maillogger provides structured data for Excel or databases, ideal for monthly reporting. For professional evaluations, the connection with graphical tools is often attractive, as they offer real-time dashboards, filter functions and alerts. This allows me to identify problems and trends without having to constantly go through the log files by hand. A scalable log analysis platform is indispensable for keeping track of rapidly growing volumes of data - for example through intensive newsletter marketing or international mailing campaigns.
Recognize error patterns and find causes
Through repeated analysis, I notice typical causes of misconduct:
- Deliveries get stuck → many
status=deferred - SPAM dispatch → high traffic peaks due to compromised accounts
- Authentication failures → brute force or incorrect client configuration
- Mailbox full → Messages end up in Nirvana
If I react early, I prevent subsequent problems. I also use monitoring solutions that display these errors graphically and alert me. Ideally, I combine Postfix log analyses with server monitoring tools (e.g. Nagios or Icinga) to monitor CPU and memory consumption at the same time. This allows me to identify possible correlations between high server loads and mail problems. For example, a security incident in which a mailbox has been successfully hacked can suddenly lead to enormous volumes of mail being sent, which puts a strain on the CPU and network.
Sometimes the logs can also be used to identify targeted attacks on specific mailing lists or mailboxes. It has already happened to me that unauthorized persons have tried to misuse a mailing list as a spam sling. It was only through the Postfix logs that I realized that an unusually large number of requests were being sent to precisely this list. Using automated filters, I was then able to contain the problem in a short time and block the affected account.
Another known error pattern is the increase in bounces for certain recipient domains. This may be due to outdated address lists or restrictions on the target server, which rejects mails if SPF or DKIM are not configured correctly. As Postfix leaves the exact error codes in the logs, I can clearly determine whether there is a 550 error (mailbox unavailable) or 554 (transaction failed), for example, and then take the appropriate measures. For example, I can adjust the sender addresses, correct DNS entries or clean up my newsletter database.
Secure logging - data protection observed
Even if log data is technically necessary, it is often considered personal data. I therefore pay attention to the retention period (e.g. max. 4 weeks), do not log any sensitive content and restrict access to administrative accounts. When detailed output is activated, I check particularly carefully whether passwords, session IDs or usernames appear. These can be anonymized with log sanitizers or sed scripts.
Compliance plays a particularly important role in the corporate environment. The data protection department can provide clear guidelines on how long and in what form log files may be stored. It is worth establishing a coordinated process at an early stage so that I can prove at any time during audits or inspections that the data has only been stored to the extent necessary. Those who ensure that logs are stored centrally and securely and that access is logged are on the safe side.
Advanced monitoring strategies
In addition to looking at the log files, system-wide monitoring that keeps an eye on both the Postfix processes and the underlying services is also worthwhile. For example, I can set up alerts if the mail queue exceeds a defined size or if the number of failed logins rises sharply. The integration of external blacklists in the Postfix configuration also helps to take timely action against spam senders. If an increasing number of rejected connections (status=reject) are visible in the logs, I automatically block the corresponding IP addresses or monitor them more closely.
The integration of metrics on mail runtimes is just as useful. After all, if emails hang in the queue significantly longer than usual, this may indicate network problems or poor recipient routing. This is how I create an overall picture from performance data and log entries. It's worth investing a certain amount of time in automation here, as this allows me to report continuously and not just react to complaints.
Those who work in larger organizations benefit from collaboration with other IT departments. For example, information from firewalls or other network devices can provide valuable context about the origin of certain attacks. Postfix logs can be correlated with logs from web servers or databases to better understand complex incidents. SMTP attacks are often only one aspect of a broader attack that targets different services.
Review and recommendations from the field
Structured control over Postfix logs allows me to proactively identify problems, ward off attacks and ensure trouble-free mail operations. The combination of daily analysis, targeted filters and specialized tools saves time and reduces the risk of downtime. For professional environments with high mail volumes in particular, I recommend hosting that offers closely integrated monitoring, logging and security. The infrastructure of webhosting.com offers exactly that: high reliability, reporting features and automated support for mail problems.
With a little practice, the supposedly dry log analysis becomes a powerful diagnostic tool for everyday IT consulting and system maintenance. I choose an approach that suits the respective scenario: from manual grep-filters, pflogsumm reports and debug logs through to the combination with comprehensive monitoring software. If you continuously read postfix logs, you will save yourself a lot of time and trouble later on and can keep your own infrastructure at a secure and high-performance level.
