Skip to content 
Object Storage complements classic web space in a targeted manner: I store static assets, backups and large media files in buckets, thus reducing the load on the web server, lowering costs and speeding up delivery. Instead of folder structures, I use a flat namespace with objects including metadata, which enables horizontal scaling, versioning and a direct CDN connection and makes the Webspace free for dynamic tasks.
Key points
- ScalabilityGrow horizontally at exabyte level, without folder limits.
- CostsPay-as-you-go, favorable TB prices and lifecycle rules.
- S3 compatibilitySimple API integration, broad tool support.
- CDN delivery: Static assets directly, low server load.
- SecurityEncryption, replication, versioning and policies.
Why Object Storage reduces the load on web space
I separate tasks clearly: The web space processes PHP, databases and sessions, while Object Storage reliably provides static files. This decoupling reduces I/O bottlenecks because I serve images, videos, PDFs and backups via HTTP and edge caches. The web server processes fewer requests and responds faster to dynamic page requests. The site remains accessible during traffic peaks because the asset hosting scales and does not block any folder trees. Suitable for getting started Object Storage Hosting, so that I can connect buckets cleanly to my CMS and standardize the media output.
Functionality: Objects, buckets and APIs
I save files as objects, i.e. user data plus Metadata such as content type, cache control, tags or individual key values. Each object has a unique ID and is located in a flat namespace, which enables parallel access and fast listing. Instead of NFS or SMB, I use HTTP-based REST APIs, plus signed URLs and presigned uploads for controlled access. Versioning stores previous states so that rollbacks and audits remain traceable. Replication across multiple zones increases availability, while I use lifecycle rules to automatically move or delete old versions.
Naming conventions and key design
A flat namespace does not mean that I do without structure. I design my object keys so that I can list and cache efficiently. Prefixes according to project, environment and date have proven their worth, such as projectA/prod/2026/02/ followed by logically grouped file names. This way I keep listings focused and distribute the load across many prefixes. I avoid leading special characters, spaces and overlong keys; hyphens and slashes, on the other hand, are readable and compatible. For unchangeable assets, I append hashes or build IDs (app.a1b2c3.js) and set very long cache TTLs. For user-related uploads, I use UUIDs in nested prefixes (users/ab/cd/uuid.ext) so that no „hot prefixes“ are created. Uniform capitalization and clear rules for file extensions facilitate subsequent migrations and automation.
Consistency, concurrency and ETags
Object Storage is optimized for massive parallelism, but I take the consistency models into account: New objects are usually immediately readable, overwrites and deletes can be possibly consistent for a short time. To avoid race conditions, I use ETags and conditional operations (If-Match/If-None-Match): This way, I only write if content has not changed and cache valid responses on the client side. Unique object paths per version instead of „in-place“ overwriting help with parallel uploads. Versioning provides additional protection: even if two deployments collide, the history remains intact and I can roll back in a targeted manner. For large files, I rely on multipart uploads and parallel transfer of the parts; this shortens the upload time and allows resume in the event of connection interruptions.
Comparison: Object, file, block - at a glance
I choose the storage model according to the task: For media and backups I use Object, for shared drives File, for databases Block. The following table summarizes the differences and helps when planning a hybrid hosting architecture. This is how I combine low latency for transactional workloads with maximum scalability for static assets. Clear responsibilities avoid migration problems later on. Standardized naming conventions and tags also make searching and automation easier.
| Feature | Object Storage | Block storage | File Storage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data structure | Objects with Metadata | Fixed blocks without metadata | Hierarchical folders |
| Access | HTTP/REST, SDKs, signed URLs | Directly through the operating system | NFS/SMB |
| Scalability | Horizontal to exabyte | Limited | Limited (petabyte range) |
| Latency | Higher than block | Low | Medium |
| Deployments | Backups, media, logs, data lake | VMs, databases, transactions | Teamshares, application files |
| Cost orientation | Inexpensive per TB | High | Medium |
| Strength in hosting | Static Assets, CDN | Transactional workloads | Shared files |
Performance and delivery: CDN, cache, images
I minimize latency by placing objects over a CDN with edge nodes and set meaningful cache control headers. Long TTLs for unchangeable assets and cache busting via file names ensure predictable behavior. For images, I create variants per resolution and device, which I store in object storage to reduce the load on the origin. Range requests help with videos so that players fast-forward and load in segments. Monitoring with metrics such as hit rate, TTFB and egress shows where I need to optimize.
Image formats, on-the-fly transformation and cache validation
I use modern formats such as WebP or AVIF in parallel to PNG/JPEG and save them as separate objects. This reduces bandwidth and improves the loading time on mobile devices. I decide whether to transform images on-the-fly or render them in advance depending on the load profile: Edge transformation is worthwhile for a few variants; for large catalogs, I save pre-rendered sizes in the bucket so that I achieve consistent cache hits. I choose immutable file names for CSS/JS and fonts; changes are made as a new file instead of overwriting. This saves me a lot of cache invalidations and protects the Origin from „stampedes“. For API-supported downloads I use Content disposition clean, so that browsers act as expected.
Security, rights and GDPR
I rely on at-rest and in-transit encryption, restrictive bucket policies and finely granulated IAM-roles. Private buckets remain standard, while I publicly release only the paths that the CDN needs. Signed URLs limit validity and scope so that downloads remain controlled. Version history protects against accidental overwriting and facilitates restores. For GDPR, I choose data center regions close to the target group and have order processing contracts ready.
Disaster recovery, replication and immutability
I actively plan for failures: cross-zone or cross-region replication keeps copies of my data spatially separated and reduces the RPO. For critical backups, I use immutability via retention policies or object lock so that neither accidental deletions nor ransomware destroy older versions. I document RTO and RPO for each data record class and test restores regularly, including random samples from archive animals. I monitor replication metrics, backlogs and delays in order to take early countermeasures in the event of network disruptions. For releases, I store „golden“ artifacts immutably and version deployment manifests so that I can rebuild systems deterministically.
Controlling costs: storage classes and lifecycle
I reduce costs by keeping frequently used files in the hot-tier and downloading older versions via Lifecycle to the cold tier. A simple example calculation helps with planning: 1 TB corresponds to 1024 GB; assuming €0.01/GB per month, I'm looking at around €10.24 per month for storage. In addition, there are requests and outgoing traffic, which I reduce significantly with caching. I optimize object sizes so that upload parts are transferred efficiently and a few requests are sufficient. Reports per bucket show me which folder paths and file types cause the most traffic.
Avoid cost traps: Requests, small objects and egress
In addition to TB prices, request costs and egress are the main factors influencing the bill. Many very small files cause a disproportionately high number of GETs and HEADs. I therefore bundle assets sensibly (e.g. spritesheets only if caching does not suffer as a result) and use HTTP/2/3 advantages without exaggerating artificial summarization. For APIs and downloads, I use aggressive edge caches to maximize hit rates. Pre-signed uploads in larger parts reduce error rates and repetitions. I plan lifecycle transitions taking into account minimum retention times in the cold tier so that no retrieval fees come as a surprise. I correlate access logs and cost reports to identify and optimize „hot“ paths.
Compatibility: S3 API and tools
I choose S3-compatible services so that SDKs, CLI tools and Plugins work without customization. I do uploads with rclone or Cyberduck, automations with GitHub Actions or CI pipelines. For applications, I use official SDKs, presigned URLs and multipart uploads. I document policies and KMS keys centrally so that deployments remain reproducible. An overview of S3-compatible providers to combine region, performance and price structure appropriately.
Automation and infrastructure as code
I describe buckets, policies, KMS keys, replication and lifecycle rules as code. This allows me to version infrastructure changes, integrate them into review processes and roll them out in a reproducible way. I keep secrets such as access keys out of the code and use short-lived, rotating login credentials. For deployments, I define pipelines that build, check and sign artifacts and place them in the bucket with the correct metadata (content type, cache control, integrity hashes). I separate staging and production environments using separate buckets and dedicated roles so that least privilege is strictly adhered to.
Typical use cases in web hosting
I outsource media libraries, store backups incrementally and archive Logfiles for analysis purposes. E-commerce benefits from high-resolution product images and variants per region, which CDN nodes provide quickly. For CI/CD, I store build artifacts on a version basis and automatically delete old versions. Data lakes collect raw data for later reporting or machine learning experiments. I even operate complete static pages via static site hosting directly from a bucket.
Migration from existing web space
For the migration, I first inventory all static resources and assign them to logical paths. Then I migrate content in parallel, test access with private hostnames and signed URLs and only then activate public endpoints. In apps and CMS, I map upload destinations to the bucket, while historical URLs point to the new structure via rewrites or 301 redirects. For long-running sessions, I plan a transition phase in which both old and new paths work. Finally, I clean up webspace assets so that no outdated copies are delivered. Important: I document the new key structure so that teams work consistently.
Step by step: Start and integrate
I start with a bucket name, activate Versioning and define tags for cost centers. I then set IAM roles for reading, writing and lists, use public rights sparingly and test presigned uploads. In the CMS, I link media uploads to the bucket, set cache control headers and activate a CDN with origin shield. Lifecycle rules move old versions to the archive after 30 days and delete them after 180 days. Monitoring and cost alerts inform me of anomalies at an early stage.
Monitoring, logs and observability
I activate access logs per bucket and write them to a separate, protected bucket. From this, I obtain metrics on 2xx/3xx/4xx/5xx rates, latencies, top paths and user agents. Error codes in combination with referrers show integration problems early on. For replication I monitor delays and failed attempts, for lifecycle the number of transitions and cleanup runs. I define alarm limits for unusual egress peaks, an increase in 5xx errors or falling CDN hit rates. In deployments, I measure TTFB and time-to-interactive from a user perspective and correlate results with object sizes and numbers. This allows me to see whether I should invest in compression, image variants or caching.
Common mistakes and best practices
- Public buckets without necessity: I work privately by default and only expose exactly required paths via CDN or signed access.
- Missing metadata: Incorrect Content type-Headers slow down browsers; I set them correctly when uploading and check them randomly.
- Overwriting instead of versioning: Immutable deployments are more robust and simplify caching.
- Too many small files: I optimize bundles carefully and use HTTP/2/3 without destroying the cache hit rate.
- No lifecycle maintenance: Old versions and artifacts cost money in the long term; rules keep buckets lean.
- Poor key structure: Unclear prefixes make authorizations, cost analysis and tidying up difficult.
- Lack of tests for restores: Backups are only as good as the regularly practiced restore process.
Conclusion
I combine web space and object storage to combine dynamic logic and static Assets cleanly separated. The result is faster loading times, lower server load and predictable costs. S3 APIs, CDN edge and lifecycle management give me tools for growth without rebuilding. I keep security and compliance under control with encryption, roles and region selection. This approach reliably supports websites beyond traffic peaks and data growth.
